Syntactic representation is independent of semantics in Mandarin: evidence from syntactic priming

ABSTRACT Theories of language processing generally assume that speakers construct independent representations for syntactic and semantic information, based largely on evidence from English and related languages. But it is not clear whether the assumption of autonomous syntactic representations extends to other languages with different typological characteristics. We therefore conducted two structural priming studies investigating production of dative sentences in Mandarin, a language whose interpretation appears to be more reliant on non-relational (intrinsic) semantics (e.g. animacy features). We examined whether participants’ tendency to repeat syntax was affected by whether the theme and recipient arguments matched or mismatched in animacy across prime and target. Participants repeated syntax to the same extent irrespective of whether prime and target arguments had matched or mismatched animacy. These findings provide evidence that the separation of syntactic and semantic representations occurs in Mandarin and therefore may occur across languages.

[1]  J. Snedeker,et al.  How broad are thematic roles? Evidence from structural priming , 2018, Cognition.

[2]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992, Psychological review.

[3]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue , 2000, Cognition.

[4]  A. Friederici,et al.  Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  Mapping Concepts to Syntax: Evidence from Structural Priming in Mandarin Chinese. , 2012 .

[6]  D. Bates,et al.  Balancing Type I Error and Power in Linear Mixed Models , 2015, 1511.01864.

[7]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Processing A Language without Inflections: A Reaction Time Study of Sentence Interpretation in Chinese , 1993 .

[8]  S. Chen,et al.  Surface cues and pragmatic interpretation of given/new in Mandarin Chinese and English: A comparative study , 2012 .

[9]  J. Zwart The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[10]  Holly P Branigan,et al.  Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[12]  Zhenguang G Cai,et al.  It is there whether you hear it or not: Syntactic representation of missing arguments , 2015, Cognition.

[13]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[16]  K. Bock,et al.  Framing sentences , 1990, Cognition.

[17]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Persistence of emphasis in language production: A cross-linguistic approach , 2009, Cognition.

[18]  Ping Li,et al.  Syntax does not necessarily precede semantics in sentence processing: ERP evidence from Chinese , 2013, Brain and Language.

[19]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Relationship between Sentence Meaning and Word Order: Evidence from Structural Priming in German , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[21]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Sentence integration processes: An ERP study of Chinese sentence comprehension with relative clauses , 2010, Brain and Language.

[22]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Closed-class immanence in sentence production , 1989, Cognition.

[23]  M. Pickering,et al.  An experimental approach to linguistic representation , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Syntactic priming in comprehension: the role of argument order and animacy. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[26]  Randy J. LaPolla,et al.  Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese , 2003 .

[27]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[28]  Julie E Boland,et al.  Semantics does not need a processing license from syntax in reading Chinese. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  M. Garrett Levels of processing in sentence production , 1980 .

[30]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[31]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Meaning, sound and syntax in english number agreement , 1993 .

[32]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  Is young children's passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. , 2012 .

[33]  J. K. Bock Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  Franklin Chang,et al.  Do Lemmas Speak German? A Verb Position Effect in German Structural Priming , 2015, Cogn. Sci..

[35]  Rumjahn Hoosain,et al.  Psycholinguistic Implications for Linguistic Relativity: A Case Study of Chinese , 1991 .

[36]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production , 2008 .

[38]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  Lexical and syntactic representations in closely related languages: Evidence from Cantonese–Mandarin bilinguals , 2011 .

[39]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production , 2000, Cognition.

[40]  M. Pickering,et al.  Structural priming: a critical review. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  Chauncey Cheng-hsi Chu,et al.  A Discourse Grammar of Mandarin Chinese , 1998 .

[42]  Ping Li,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken sentence comprehension in Chinese , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  M. Pickering,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing in Mandarin: Evidence from structural priming , 2016 .

[44]  Perla B. Gámez,et al.  Exploring interactions between semantic and syntactic processes: The role of animacy in syntactic priming. , 2015, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[45]  Zhixing Jin,et al.  The effects of punctuations in Chinese sentence comprehension: An ERP study , 2010, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[46]  A. Friederici The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. , 2011, Physiological reviews.

[47]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Can thematic roles leave traces of their places? , 2003, Cognition.

[48]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar , 1989 .

[49]  Victor S. Ferreira,et al.  The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all , 2003 .

[50]  Peter Green,et al.  SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation , 2016 .

[51]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Neurodynamics of sentence interpretation: ERP evidence from French , 2007, Biological Psychology.