The linkage between state socioeconomic and political environments and issues found in decisions of state courts of last resort is explored. It is found that, in general, state courts of last resort in rural, politically undifferentiated states tend to decide larger proportions of private litigation than courts within more highly industrialized, politically competitive states. These latter courts of last resort tend to focus upon criminal law, civil liberties, and economic regulation cases. Multiple regression analysis shows that the six environmental descriptors and one court system variable-the presence or absence of an intermediate appellate court-explain a substantial portion of the variance in the distribution of issues among the states. The study demonstrates that environmental variables are important predictors to the kinds of decisions rendered by courts, and underscores the need for more systematic, comparative analysis of state judicial systems. A considerable body of research published in the last several years has demonstrated the important effects of socioeconomic and political diversification upon political processes and policy outputs. (Dye, 1966; Sharkansky and Hofferbert, 1972). Yet little research has been conducted on the impact of environmental differences on judicial processes and policy. This is not to suggest, however, than the linkage between environmental conditions and courts has been totally ignored. On the contrary, most models of the judicial processes make some reference to this linkage, and the systems model in particular underscores the effects of the flow of demands and conflict from the environment towards the judicial system. (Sigler, 1968; Goldman and Jahnige, 1970). However, while reference is often made to these relationships, the literature is still devoid of empirical research that systematically examines the impact of environment upon judicial action. To remedy this omission, the present study will offer a comparative examination of the relationship between socioeconomic and political conditions within the fifty American states, on the one hand, and issues decided by state courts of last resort on
[1]
H. Glick,et al.
Formal Judicial Recruitment and State Supreme Court Decisions
,
1974
.
[2]
T. Dye.
Understanding Public Policy
,
1972
.
[3]
D. Jaros,et al.
Dissent on State Supreme Courts: The Differential Significance of Characteristics of Judges
,
1971
.
[4]
D. Jaros,et al.
External Variables, Institutional Structure & Dissent on State Supreme Courts
,
1970,
Polity.
[5]
Richard I. Hofferbert,et al.
Dimensions of State Politics, Economics, and Public Policy
,
1969,
American Political Science Review.
[6]
Richard I. Hofferbert.
Socioeconomic Dimensions of the American States: 1890-1960
,
1968
.