Mining life cycle modelling: a cradle-to-gate approach to environmental management in the minerals industry

Abstract It is common practise in mining Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies to use a predefined set of data to represent mining production systems. Besides this, very little is added to improve data quality, and essential mining process details which affect the ultimate environmental impacts is rarely taken into account. Some significant omissions include exploration and development work, mining method used, production, ore losses, location and the mining/processing method dependent factors that govern the nature of discharges to the environment. The mining system is often represented as a black-box, not lending itself to the interpretation of different processes used in minerals production. The generic data used are often inadequate for a mining LCA, and cannot be used as an accurate account of mining environmental burdens contributing to more complex systems “down-stream”, such as metals, building, chemical or food industries. Therefore, the main objective of the mining LCA model presented in this paper was to develop a tool that is able to represent the mining system in a comprehensive way. To attain this objective, the mining system was studied in more detail, as it is commonly practised during mine feasibility and design stages. It (LICYMIN) was developed as part of an international research project led by Imperial College London. The model integrates the mine production, processing, waste treatment and disposal, rehabilitation and aftercare stages of a mine's life within an LCA framework. The development work was carried out in collaboration with several industrial partners in Europe, including Bakonyi Bauxitbanya Kft. in Hungary. The model structure, database development and examples of field applications from industrial sites are presented.

[1]  Xiao Xiao,et al.  LCA case study for lead and zinc production by an imperial smelting process in china a brief presentation , 2002 .

[2]  Tieyong Zuo,et al.  An accumulative model for the comparative life cycle assessment case study: iron and steel process , 2002 .

[3]  Andrea Schreiber,et al.  Integrated analysis of metallic resource flows , 1998 .

[4]  D. J. Brennan,et al.  Application of life cycle assessment to process selection for pollutant treatment : A case study of sulphur dioxide emissions from Australian metallurgical smelters , 1996 .

[5]  James A. Fava,et al.  A Technical Framework for Life-Cycle Assessment , 1994 .

[6]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2002 .

[7]  L. W. Ayres,et al.  The Life Cycle of Copper, Its Co-Products and Byproducts , 2003 .

[8]  Laan van Westenenk,et al.  Improvement of LCA characterization factors and LCA practice for metals , 2004 .

[9]  B. Field.  Environmental Economics: An Introduction , 1979 .

[10]  Kyoo-Kun Koh,et al.  Decision-making of nuclear energy policy: application of environmental management tool to nuclear fuel cycle , 2002 .

[11]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[12]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[13]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle assessment as a tool for improving process performance: A case study on boron products , 1999 .

[14]  Joachim Krüger,et al.  Sachbilanz einer Ökobilanz der Kupfererzeugung und -verarbeitung. III , 1995 .