Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations.

Three college students in Experiment 1 and 1 student in Experiment 2 learned visual conditional discriminations under contextual control by tones; the visual comparison stimulus that was correct with a given sample stimulus depended on whether a high tone or a low tone was present. Two of the subjects in Experiment 1 then demonstrated the emergence of two sets of contextually controlled three-member classes of equivalent stimuli, and the subject in Experiment 2 showed the emergence of contextually controlled four-member classes; the class membership of each stimulus varied as a function of the tones. Class membership was demonstrated by the subjects' performance of new conditional discriminations that they had never been taught directly. In Experiment 2, the procedures were intended to ensure that the tones exerted second-order conditional control and did not simply form compounds with each of the visual stimuli, but the subject's verbal description of the tasks suggested that this intention might not have been successful. It could not be ascertained, therefore, whether the tones exerted contextual control as independent second-order conditional stimuli or simply as common elements of auditory-visual stimulus compounds.

[1]  M. Sidman,et al.  Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  M Sidman,et al.  A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  T Thompson,et al.  Conditional relations by monkeys: Reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. , 1987, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  E. Weigl,et al.  On the psychology of so-called processes of abstraction. , 1941 .

[5]  M Sidman,et al.  Acquisition of matching to sample via mediated transfer. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  W. V. Dube,et al.  Stimulus class membership established via stimulus-reinforcer relations. , 1987, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  M. Sidman,et al.  Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  R. Stromer,et al.  Control of adolescents' arbitrary matching-to-sample by positive and negative stimulus relations. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  The role of physical identity of the sample and correct comparison stimulus in matching-to-sample paradigms. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  R. Lazar,et al.  Second-order control of sequence-class equivalences in children , 1986, Behavioural Processes.

[11]  G. Karlan,et al.  The development of derived stimulus relations through training in arbitrary-matching sequences. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  E C McDonagh,et al.  Teaching coin equivalences via matching to sample. , 1984, Applied research in mental retardation.

[13]  S. Hayes,et al.  OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR EQUIVALENCE CLASS FORMATION IN LANGUAGE-ABLE AND LANGUAGE-DISABLED CHILDREN , 2005 .

[14]  Murray Sidman,et al.  Matching-to-sample procedures and the development of equivalence relations: The role of naming , 1986 .

[15]  P. Touchette,et al.  Transfer of stimulus control: measuring the moment of transfer. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  R. Lazar Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  Klaus E. Liebold,et al.  Stimulus control of matching and oddity in a pigeon , 1966 .

[18]  L. Sánchez,et al.  The formation of visual stimulus equivalences in children. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  L Fields,et al.  The structure of equivalence classes. , 1987, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.