Improving selection interviews with structure: organisations’ use of “behavioural” interviews

Explains the advantages of behavioural interviewing as a method of employee selection. Reports on a survey of UK organisations’ use of behavioural interviewing in selection. Both interviewers and candidates were positive about the technique. Benefits identified were better quality information gathering leading to improved selection decisions, more consistency and improved skills of interviewers, as well providing candidates with better opportunities to explain their skills. Concerns were raised regarding the training, practice and time required, scoring procedures and possible limitations in respect of certain candidates. Links with wider use of competencies in HRM are examined as well as links with other selection methods. Concludes that behavioural interviewing has significant benefits in improving selection and can also be applied to other interviewing situations such as discipline and grievance. Discusses implications for interviewers, candidates and trainers. Issues for further research are outlined.

[1]  J. Barclay.  Employee selection: a question of structure , 1999 .

[2]  L. D. Milia,et al.  Some Factors Explaining the Reliability of a Structured Interview System at a Work Site , 1997 .

[3]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE IN THE SELECTION INTERVIEW , 1997 .

[4]  M. L. Cooper,et al.  Drinking to regulate positive and negative emotions: a motivational model of alcohol use. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Experience-based and situational interview questions: Studies of validity. , 1995 .

[6]  I. Robertson,et al.  The Psychology of Personnel Selection: A Quality Approach , 1995 .

[7]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  Structured interviewing: A note on incremental validity and alternative question types. , 1994 .

[8]  Steven D. Maurer,et al.  The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. , 1994 .

[9]  A. F. Carr,et al.  Development of Standard Anchors for Scoring Generic Past‐Behaviour Questions in Structured Interviews , 1993 .

[10]  V. Shackleton,et al.  Successful Selection Interviewing , 1993 .

[11]  Richard S. Williams.  Management Selection In Local Government: A Survey of Practice In England and Wales , 1992 .

[12]  Sue Newell,et al.  Management selection: A comparative survey of methods used in top British and French companies , 1991 .

[13]  Michael M. Harris.  RECONSIDERING THE EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW: A REVIEW OF RECENT LITERATURE AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1989 .

[14]  Steven D. Maurer,et al.  EFFECT OF SITUATIONAL INTERVIEWS, CONVENTIONAL STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS, AND TRAINING ON INTERVIEW RATING AGREEMENT: AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS , 1988 .

[15]  T. J. Bergmann,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL RECRUITMENT ACTIVITIES AND APPLICANTs' REACTIONS AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS , 1987 .

[16]  Ivan T. Robertson,et al.  Management selection in Britain: A survey and critique , 1986 .

[17]  Christopher Orpen,et al.  Patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews: A comparative validity study. , 1985 .

[18]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Do people do what they say? Further studies on the situational interview. , 1984 .

[19]  I. Robertson,et al.  Self Assessment, Realistic Job Previews and Occupational Decisions , 1983 .

[20]  Tom Janz,et al.  Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews. , 1982 .

[21]  Neil Anderson.  Eight decades of employment interview research: a retrospective meta-review and prospective commentary , 1992 .

[22]  Steven F. Cronshaw,et al.  The validity of the employment interview: Models for research and practice. , 1989 .

[23]  J. G. Goodale.  Effective employment interviewing. , 1989 .

[24]  S. Rynes.  The Employment Interview as a Recruitment Device , 1988 .

[25]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal Setting: A Motivational Technique That Works! , 1984 .