Stability of commercial metal oxide nanoparticles in water.

The fate of commercial nanoparticles in water is of significant interest to health and regulatory authorities. This research investigated the dispersion and stability of metal oxide nanoparticles in water as well as their removal by potable water treatment processes. Commercial nanoparticles were received as powder aggregates, and in water neither ultrasound nor chemical dispersants could break them up into primary nanoparticles. Lab-synthesized hematite was prepared as a primary nanoparticle (85 nm) suspension; upon drying and 1-month storage, however, hematite formed aggregates that could not be dispersed completely as primary nanoparticles in water. This observation may explain why it is difficult to disperse dry commercial nanoparticles. Except for silica, other nanoparticles rapidly aggregated in tap water due to electric double layer (EDL) compression. The stability of silica in tap water is related to its low Hamaker constant. For all these nanoparticles, at an alum dosage of 60 mg/L, coagulation followed by sedimentation could remove 20-60% of the total nanoparticle mass. Filtration using a 0.45 microm filter was required to remove more than 90% of the nanoparticle mass.

[1]  Ann Thayer.  insights: Synergy: Overused, Underrealized , 2000 .

[2]  E. Grulke,et al.  Breakage of TiO2 agglomerates in electrostatically stabilized aqueous dispersions , 2005 .

[3]  Robert N Grass,et al.  In vitro cytotoxicity of oxide nanoparticles: comparison to asbestos, silica, and the effect of particle solubility. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  K. Donaldson,et al.  Inhalation of poorly soluble particles. II. Influence Of particle surface area on inflammation and clearance. , 2000, Inhalation toxicology.

[5]  K. Gotoh,et al.  Influence of surface properties of particles on their adhesion and removal , 1989 .

[6]  C. Bernhardt.  Preparation of suspensions for particle size analysis. Methodical recommendations, liquids and dispersing agents , 1988 .

[7]  C. V. Oss,et al.  Interfacial Forces in Aqueous Media , 1994 .

[8]  J. Raper,et al.  Structure and kinetics of aggregating colloidal haematite , 1990 .

[9]  J. Lewis.  Colloidal Processing of Ceramics , 2004 .

[10]  L. Koopal,et al.  Preparation and optical properties of homodisperse haematite hydrosols. , 1986 .

[11]  Z. Yaremko,et al.  Redispersion of Highly Disperse Powder of Titanium Dioxide in Aqueous Medium , 2001 .

[12]  P. C. Hiemenz,et al.  Principles of colloid and surface chemistry , 1977 .

[13]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  Measurement of Inherent Material Density of Nanoparticle Agglomerates , 2004 .

[14]  R. Yoon,et al.  Application of Extended DLVO Theory: II. Stability of Silica Suspensions , 1993 .

[15]  Y. Chiang,et al.  Comparisons of Hamaker constants for ceramic systems with intervening vacuum or water : From force laws and physical properties , 1996 .

[16]  P. Searson,et al.  Epitaxial Assembly in Aged Colloids , 2001 .

[17]  R. J. Hunter,et al.  Zeta Potential in Colloid Science , 1981 .

[18]  H. Jeng,et al.  Toxicity of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in Mammalian Cells , 2006, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[19]  D. Sverjensky.  Prediction of surface charge on oxides in salt solutions: Revisions for 1:1 (M+L−) electrolytes , 2005 .

[20]  H. Ohshima,et al.  Colloidal stability of aqueous polymeric dispersions: effect of water insoluble excipients. , 2005, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[21]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[22]  A. P. Black,et al.  EFFECT OF PARTICLE SIZE ON TURBIDITY REMOVAL , 1969 .

[23]  Lawrence E Murr,et al.  Comparative in vitro cytotoxicity assessment of some manufacturednanoparticulate materials characterized by transmissionelectron microscopy , 2005 .