A bottom-up approach for tumour differentiation in whole slide images of lung adenocarcinoma

Analysis of tumour cells is essential for morphological characterisation which is useful for disease prognosis and survival prediction. Visual assessment of tumour cell morphology by expert human observers for prognostic purposes is subjective and potentially a tedious process. In this paper, we propose an automated and objective method for tumour cell analysis in whole slide images (WSI) of lung adenocarcinoma. Tumour cells are first extracted at higher magnification and then morphological, texture and spatial distribution features are computed for each cell. We investigated the biological impact of the nuclear features in the context of tumour grading. Results show that some of these features are correlated with tumour grade. We examine some of these features on the WSI where these features shows different distribution depends on the tumour grade.

[1]  B. Yener,et al.  Cell-Graph Mining for Breast Tissue Modeling and Classification , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Nasir M. Rajpoot,et al.  Locality Sensitive Deep Learning for Detection and Classification of Nuclei in Routine Colon Cancer Histology Images , 2016, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[3]  Chao-Hui Huang,et al.  Nuclear pleomorphism scoring by selective cell nuclei detection , 2009, WACV.

[4]  J. Austin,et al.  The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances Since the 2004 Classification. , 2015, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[5]  D. Gleason,et al.  Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective. , 1992, Human pathology.

[6]  H. Bloom,et al.  Histological Grading and Prognosis in Breast Cancer , 1957, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  Jianhui Chen,et al.  Automated grading of breast cancer histopathology using cascaded ensemble with combination of multi-level image features , 2017, Neurocomputing.

[8]  F. Erdoğan,et al.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma , 2004, International journal of clinical practice.

[9]  John Meyer,et al.  Grading nuclear pleomorphism on histological micrographs , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[10]  A. Huisman,et al.  Automatic Nuclei Segmentation in H&E Stained Breast Cancer Histopathology Images , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Automated gland and nuclei segmentation for grading of prostate and breast cancer histopathology , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[12]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Algorithms for Clustering Data , 1988 .

[13]  Shu Ichihara,et al.  Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[14]  M. L. R. D. Christenson,et al.  International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2012 .

[15]  L. Chirieac,et al.  Prognostic significance of grading in lung adenocarcinoma , 2010, Cancer.

[16]  Ian O Ellis,et al.  Prognostic significance of Nottingham histologic grade in invasive breast carcinoma. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Akiko Miyagi Maeshima,et al.  Interobserver Agreement in the Nuclear Grading of Primary Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[18]  Jianhui Chen,et al.  An automatic breast cancer grading method in histopathological images based on pixel-, object-, and semantic-level features , 2016, 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[19]  Seok Ho Kang,et al.  Characteristics and prognostic value of papillary histologic subtype in nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma in Korea: a multicenter study. , 2014, Urology journal.

[20]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[21]  Fei Dong,et al.  Papillary renal cell carcinoma: correlation of tumor grade and histologic characteristics with clinical outcome. , 2015, Human pathology.

[22]  R. Zaino,et al.  FIGO Staging of Endometrial Adenocarcinoma: A Critical Review and Proposal , 2009, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[23]  B. A. Carter,et al.  Histologic Patterns and Molecular Characteristics of Lung Adenocarcinoma Associated With Clinical Outcome , 2013 .

[24]  R. Kurman,et al.  The utility of the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics histologic grading of endometrial adenocarcinoma using a defined nuclear grading system. A gynecologic oncology group study , 1995, Cancer.

[25]  F. Collin,et al.  Comparative study of the National Cancer Institute and French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group grading systems in a population of 410 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Automated classification of breast cancer morphology in histopathological images , 2013, Diagnostic Pathology.

[27]  Lawrence D. True,et al.  The critical role of the pathologist in determining eligibility for active surveillance as a management option in patients with prostate cancer: consensus statement with recommendations supported by the College of American Pathologists, International Society of Urological Pathology, Association of D , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[28]  Panagiota Spyridonos,et al.  Advanced soft computing diagnosis method for tumour grading , 2006, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[29]  Junior Barrera,et al.  Structural Analysis of Histological Images to Aid Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer , 2012, 2012 25th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images.

[30]  W. Travis,et al.  Pathologic classification of adenocarcinoma of lung , 2013, Journal of surgical oncology.

[31]  Eric Lim,et al.  Prognostic Significance of Predominant Histologic Pattern and Nuclear Grade in Resected Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: Potential Parameters for a Grading System , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[32]  Y. Istefanopulos,et al.  IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  Eric A Singer,et al.  Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma: should it be labeled as cancer? , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.