A comparative study between parabolic trough and solar tower technologies in Solar Rankine Cycle and Integrated Solar Combined Cycle plants

Abstract Simulations were carried out to predict the performance of a Solar Rankine Cycle (SRC) and an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle (ISCC) when combined with two different solar field configurations based on parabolic trough and power tower systems. For the selected cases, yearly plant performance was computed under real operating conditions on a one hour basis. A computing procedure was developed by integrating two commercial softwares with in-house computer code. Thermodynamic performance was featured for every plant configuration both at nominal and part load conditions. A single reheat regenerative Rankine cycle was chosen for the SRC plant whereas a commercial gas turbine, i.e. Siemens SGT-800, with a dual pressure heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) was assumed for the ISCC plant. As far as the heat transfer fluid (HTF) is concerned, molten salt was chosen to transfer heat to the water loop in the SRC. Synthetic oil was considered in the ISCC plant. Plants were assumed to be located in a Southern Spain site. The comparative analysis was mainly focused on the influence of CSP technology on global solar energy conversion efficiency of both SRC and ISCC plants. Special attention was devoted to assess trough collectors (PTCs) against the solar tower (ST) system in terms of intercepted radiation and thermal power sent to the power block. The ISCC coupled with a ST was found to assure the highest annual solar-to-electric efficiency of 21.8%. This is the result of both higher collection efficiency of ST compared to PTCs and higher conversion efficiency of solar energy introduced into the combined cycle, as compared to SRC.

[1]  Mahmood Yaghoubi,et al.  Exergy analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle system , 2010 .

[2]  Qiang Yu,et al.  Modeling and simulation of 1 MW DAHAN solar thermal power tower plant , 2011 .

[3]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Comparison of different solar plants based on parabolic trough technology , 2012 .

[4]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  Trough integration into power plants : a study on the performance and economy of integrated solar combined cycle systems , 2004 .

[5]  Francisco J. Collado,et al.  A review of optimized design layouts for solar power tower plants with campo code , 2013 .

[6]  Zhifeng Wang,et al.  Energy and exergy analysis of solar power tower plants , 2011 .

[7]  Aldo Steinfeld,et al.  Three-Dimensional Optical and Thermal Numerical Model of Solar Tubular Receivers in Parabolic Trough Concentrators , 2012 .

[8]  M. Valdés,et al.  Solar multiple optimization for a solar-only thermal power plant, using oil as heat transfer fluid in the parabolic trough collectors , 2009 .

[9]  S. Jones,et al.  A TRNSYS Model Library for Solar Thermal Electric Components (STEC) - A Reference Manual, Release 1.0 , 1998 .

[10]  Juan Xiao,et al.  Three-dimensional numerical study of heat transfer characteristics in the receiver tube of parabolic trough solar collector , 2010 .

[11]  H. Nezammahalleh,et al.  Conceptual design and techno-economic assessment of integrated solar combined cycle system with DSG technology , 2010 .

[12]  G. Cau,et al.  Performance and cost assessment of Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Systems (ISCCSs) using CO2 as heat transfer fluid , 2012 .

[13]  Germain Augsburger,et al.  Modelling of the receiver transient flux distribution due to cloud passages on a solar tower thermal power plant , 2013 .

[14]  Craig Turchi,et al.  Gas Turbine/Solar Parabolic Trough Hybrid Designs , 2011 .

[15]  Germain Augsburger,et al.  Thermoeconomic optimization of a combined-cycle solar tower power plant , 2012 .

[16]  I. García,et al.  Performance model for parabolic trough solar thermal power plants with thermal storage: Comparison to operating plant data , 2011 .

[17]  R. Kneer,et al.  CFD-simulation of a new receiver design for a molten salt solar power tower , 2013 .

[18]  Danièle Revel,et al.  Renewable energy technologies: cost analysis series , 2012 .

[19]  D. Kearney,et al.  Assessment of a Molten Salt Heat Transfer Fluid in a Parabolic Trough Solar Field , 2003 .

[20]  G. Barigozzi,et al.  Thermal performance prediction of a solar hybrid gas turbine , 2012 .

[21]  Collins O. Ojo,et al.  Performance Evaluation of an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle , 2012 .

[22]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  TRNSYS Modeling of the SEGS VI Parabolic Trough Solar Electric Generating System , 2001 .

[23]  Eduardo Zarza,et al.  Parabolic-trough solar collectors and their applications , 2010 .

[24]  Ulf Herrmann,et al.  Optimization Studies for Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Systems , 2001 .

[25]  Nate Blair,et al.  A Detailed Physical Trough Model for NREL's Solar Advisor Model , 2010 .

[26]  Giulio Allesina,et al.  Simulation of GEMASOLAR-based solar tower plants for the Chinese energy market: Influence of plant downsizing and location change , 2013 .

[27]  D. Kearney,et al.  Validation of the FLAGSOL parabolic trough solar power plant performance model , 1994 .

[28]  F. Lippke,et al.  Simulation of the part-load behavior of a 30 MWe SEGS plant , 1995 .

[29]  Jesús Ballestrín,et al.  Solar radiation attenuation in solar tower plants , 2012 .

[30]  Giuseppe Franchini,et al.  Solar Hybrid Combined Cycle Performance Prediction Influence of Gas Turbine Model and Spool Arrangements , 2012 .

[31]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Development of an innovative code for the design of thermodynamic solar power plants part A: Code description and test case , 2011 .

[32]  U. Herrmann,et al.  Evaluation of a Molten Salt Heat Transfer Fluid in a Parabolic Trough Solar Field , 2002 .

[33]  Ulf Herrmann,et al.  Two-tank molten salt storage for parabolic trough solar power plants , 2004 .

[34]  A. Gray,et al.  Analytical Approach Treating Three-Dimensional Geometrical Effects of Parabolic Trough Collectors: Preprint , 2012 .

[35]  Henry Price,et al.  A Parabolic Trough Solar Power Plant Simulation Model , 2003 .