A Knowledge Asset-Based View of Technology: Transfer in International Joint Ventures

Abstract An integrated framework of the technology transfer process is proposed, developed from insights gained in the study of two international joint ventures. With it we try to address such questions as how much effort is required to transfer different types of technologies and what impact the organization's existing competencies or capabilities might have on that process. The framework depicts the organization as a collection of various types of embodied knowledge such as technology, operating procedures, and organizational structure. Differences between firms result from the different combinations of embodied knowledge types that are used to accomplish organizational ends. Technology transfer is considered here to be the transfer of these embodied knowledge assets between organizations. Four categories, Transfer Scope, Transfer Method, Knowledge Architecture, and Organizational Adaptive Ability, describe important elements of the transfer process. Transfer Scope describes the extent of embodied information being transferred. Transfer Method describes the approaches used to transfer the technology. Knowledge Architecture describes the structure and the interdependencies between the firm's knowledge assets. Organizational Adaptive Ability describes an organization's ability to change its knowledge architecture over time. Finally, relationships between the categories are proposed. The discussion of those proposed relationships offers insights into the nature of the technology transfer process. It also suggests implications for practitioners involved in technology transfer, as well as for academics interested in future research in this area.

[1]  Steven F Cohn,et al.  Characteristics of technically progressive firms , 1980 .

[2]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[3]  W. Ouchi,et al.  The Logic of Joint Research and Development , 1988 .

[4]  B. Kogut Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[5]  W. Orlikowski The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[6]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[7]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  The division of labour in innovation management , 1989 .

[8]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[9]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Stimulating Technological Innovation: Organizational Approaches , 1979 .

[10]  R. Katz,et al.  Project team aging and performance: The roles of project and functional managers , 1988 .

[11]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[12]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[13]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[14]  M. Aoki Toward an Economic Model of the Japanese Firm , 2013 .

[15]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[16]  Denis M. S. Lee,et al.  Technology Transfer as a Function of Position in the Spectrum from Research Through Development to Technical Services , 1979 .

[17]  Marcie J. Tyre,et al.  Task Characteristics and Organizational Problem Solving in Technological Process Change , 2011 .

[18]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Transferring Technology to the Small Manufacturing Firm: A Study of Technology Transfer in Three Countries , 2018 .

[19]  B Kogut Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[20]  T. P. Hughes Networks of power : electrification in Western society, 1880-1930 , 1984 .

[21]  Oscar Hauptman,et al.  Effectiveness of Organizational Responses to Technological Change in the Production Process , 1992 .

[22]  George R. Hall,et al.  Transfers of United States Aerospace Technology to Japan , 1968 .

[23]  Robert K. Kazanjian,et al.  Implementing manufacturing innovations: Critical choices of structure and staffing roles , 1986 .

[24]  Richard N. Cooper,et al.  The Technology Factor in International Trade , 1971 .

[25]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[26]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[27]  R. Rice Computer-Mediated Communication and Organizational Innovation , 1987 .

[28]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Information Media and Source Patterns Across Management Levels: A Pilot Study , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[30]  J. March,et al.  Learning from Samples of One or Fewer , 1991 .

[31]  A. Giddens The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[32]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Technical Communication in R & D Laboratories: The Impact of Project Work Characteristics , 1978 .

[33]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[34]  Ben L. Kedia,et al.  Cultural Constraints on Transfer of Technology Across Nations: Implications for Research in International and Comparative Management , 1988 .

[35]  Donald C. Pelz,et al.  Originality level and the innovating process in organizations , 1982 .

[36]  Donald C. Pelz,et al.  Use of Information Channels in Urban Innovations , 1983 .

[37]  John E. Ettlie,et al.  Intrafirm mobility and manufacturing modernization , 1990 .

[38]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[39]  Robert J. Thomas,et al.  What Machines Can't Do , 1994 .

[40]  N. K. Muir,et al.  The Richness Imperative and Cognitive Style , 1990 .

[41]  A. Meyer Adapting to environmental jolts. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[42]  E. Larson,et al.  Organizing for product development projects , 1988 .

[43]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .

[44]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[45]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[46]  Donald C. Pelz,et al.  Innovation Complexity and the Sequence of Innovating Stages , 1985 .

[47]  Marcie J. Tyre,et al.  Managing the Introduction of New Process Technology: International Differences in a Multi-Plant Network , 2015 .

[48]  D. Keith Robbins Deciding to Innovate: How Firms Justify Advanced Technology , 1988 .

[49]  S. Wheelwright,et al.  The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution * , 2003 .

[50]  J. E. Ettlie The timing and sources of information for the adoption and implementation of production innovations , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[51]  J. Ettlie,et al.  The Adoption Time Period for Some Transportation Innovations , 1979 .

[52]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Communication Concurrency and the New Media , 1993 .

[53]  L. Bourgeois On the Measurement of Organizational Slack , 1981 .

[54]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[55]  Hiroyuki Itami Mobilizing invisible assets , 1987 .

[56]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[57]  Arnoud Cyriel Leo,et al.  Tech Talk: How managers are stimulating global R&D communication , 1991 .

[58]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Conceptual issues in the study of innovation , 1976 .

[59]  P. Jervis,et al.  Innovation and technology transfer — The roles and characteristics of individuals , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[60]  E. Bryan Carne,et al.  A study of the factors which affect technology transfer in a multilocation multibusiness unit corporation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[61]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[62]  William E. Souder,et al.  Transferring New Technologies From R&D To Manufacturing , 1989 .

[63]  E. Rogers,et al.  Reinvention in the Innovation Process , 1980 .

[64]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  International technological gatekeeper. , 1971 .

[65]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail , 1991 .

[66]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[67]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[68]  R. Keller,et al.  Technology-Information Processing Fit and the Performance of R&D Project Groups: A Test of Contingency Theory , 1994 .

[69]  Paul A. David,et al.  Heroes, Herds and Hysteresis in Technological History: Thomas Edison and ‘The Battle of the Systems’ Reconsidered , 1992 .

[70]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[71]  M. Tushman,et al.  Readings in the Management of Innovation , 1988 .

[72]  Douglas E. Shook,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS OF JOB CATEGORIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS TO USE OF COMMUNICATION CHANNELS, INCLUDING ELECTRONIC MAIL: A META-ANALYSIS AND EXTENSION* , 1990 .

[73]  K. Arrow The limits of organization , 1974 .

[74]  K. R. Harrigan Joint ventures and competitive strategy , 1988 .

[75]  Paul Ati ' Ewell TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING* , 1992 .

[76]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[77]  K. R. Conner A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .