Scale transformation of Leaf Area Index product retrieved from multiresolution remotely sensed data: analysis and case studies

Climate and land–atmosphere models rely on accurate land-surface parameters, such as Leaf Area Index (LAI). It is crucial that the estimation of LAI represents actual ground truth. Yet it is known that the LAI values retrieved from remote sensing images suffer from scaling effects. The values retrieved from coarse resolution images are generally smaller. Scale transformations aim to derive accurate leaf area index values at a specific scale from values at other scales. In this paper, we study the scaling effect and the scale transformation algorithm of LAI in regions with different vegetation distribution characteristics, and analyse the factors that can affect the scale transformation algorithm, so that the LAI values derived from a low resolution dataset match the average LAI values of higher resolution images. Using our hybrid reflectance model and the scale transformation algorithm for continuous vegetation, we have successfully calculated the LAI values at different scales, from reflectance images of 2.5 m and 10 m spatial resolution SPOT-5 data as well as 250 m and 500 m spatial resolution MODIS data. The scaling algorithm was validated in two geographic regions and the results agreed well with the actual values. This scale transformation algorithm will allow researchers to extend the size of their study regions and eliminate the impact of remote sensing image resolution.

[1]  Roselyne Lacaze,et al.  G-function and HOt SpoT (GHOST) reflectance model: application to multi-scale airborne POLDER measurements , 2001 .

[2]  G. Bonan,et al.  Influence of Subgrid-Scale Heterogeneity in Leaf Area Index, Stomatal Resistance, and Soil Moisture on Grid-Scale Land–Atmosphere Interactions , 1993 .

[3]  Anthony W King,et al.  Aggregating Fine-Scale Ecological Knowledge to Model Coarser-Scale Attributes of Ecosystems. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[4]  J. Chen.  Spatial Scaling of a Remotely Sensed Surface Parameter by Contexture , 1999 .

[5]  J. Hogg.  Quantitative remote sensing of land surfaces , 2004 .

[6]  A. Kuusk,et al.  A reflectance model for the homogeneous plant canopy and its inversion , 1989 .

[7]  B. Hapke.  Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy: 1. Theory , 1981 .

[8]  Shunlin Liang,et al.  Numerical experiments on the spatial scaling of land surface albedo and leaf area index , 2000 .

[9]  Wenjie Fan,et al.  The spatial scaling effect of continuous canopy Leaves Area Index retrieved by remote sensing , 2009 .

[10]  Xu Xiru,et al.  Monitoring the spatial distribution of high-resolution leaf area index using observations from DMC+4 , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[11]  W. Fan,et al.  A Scale Transform Method for Leaf Area Index Retrieved from Multi-Resolutions Remote Sensing Data , 2008 .

[12]  F. Baret,et al.  Influence of landscape spatial heterogeneity on the non-linear estimation of leaf area index from moderate spatial resolution remote sensing data , 2006 .

[13]  Roselyne Lacaze,et al.  Retrieval of vegetation clumping index using hot spot signatures measured by POLDER instrument , 2002 .

[14]  C. Justice,et al.  Selecting the spatial resolution of satellite sensors required for global monitoring of land transformations , 1988 .

[15]  A. Strahler,et al.  Geometric-Optical Bidirectional Reflectance Modeling of a Conifer Forest Canopy , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  J. Chen,et al.  Defining leaf area index for non‐flat leaves , 1992 .

[17]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Multiscale analysis and validation of the MODIS LAI product: I. Uncertainty assessment , 2002 .