Cardiac hybrid imaging.

Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and myocardial perfusion imaging techniques (single photon emission computed tomography, SPECT, or positron emission tomography, PET) are established non-invasive modalities for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Cardiac hybrid imaging consists of the combination (or 'fusion') of both modalities and allows obtaining complementary morphological (coronary anatomy, stenoses) and functional (myocardial perfusion) information in a single setting. However, hybrid cardiac imaging has also generated controversy with regard to which patients should undergo such integrated examinations for clinical effectiveness and minimization of costs and radiation dose. The feasibility and clinical value of hybrid imaging has been documented in small cohort studies and selected series of patients. Hybrid imaging appears to offer superior diagnostic and prognostic information compared with stand-alone or side-by-side interpretation of data sets. Particularly in patients with multivessel disease, the hybrid approach allows identification of flow-limiting coronary lesions and thereby provides useful information for the planning of revascularization procedures. Furthermore, integration of the detailed anatomical information from CTCA with the high molecular sensitivity of SPECT and PET may be useful to evaluate targeted molecular and cellular abnormalities in the future. While currently still restricted to specialized cardiac centres, the ongoing efforts to reduce radiation exposure and the increasing clinical interest will further pave the way for an increasing use of cardiac hybrid imaging in clinical practice.

[1]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary plaque disruption. , 1995, Circulation.

[2]  Peter J. Ell,et al.  First experience of combined cardiac PET/64-detector CT angiography with invasive angiographic validation , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease , 2008 .

[4]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Myocardial iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine imaging and cardiac events in heart failure. Results of the prospective ADMIRE-HF (AdreView Myocardial Imaging for Risk Evaluation in Heart Failure) study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Albert J. Sinusas,et al.  Multimodality Imaging of Myocardial Injury and Remodeling , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Joris A H de Groot,et al.  Hybrid myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT coronary angiography and invasive coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris lead to similar treatment decisions , 2012, Heart.

[7]  Sven Eriksson,et al.  Comparison of Adenosine and Exercise Stress Test for Quantitative Perfusion Imaging in Patients on Beta-Blocker Therapy , 2001, Cardiology.

[8]  C. Fink,et al.  Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique—comparison with traditional filtered back projection , 2011, European Radiology.

[9]  P. Kaufmann,et al.  Why Quantify Myocardial Perfusion? , 2012, Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports.

[10]  Martin A Lodge,et al.  Human Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetry of 82Rb , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  V. Fuster,et al.  Imaging atherosclerotic plaque inflammation by fluorodeoxyglucose with positron emission tomography: ready for prime time? , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  J. Kooner,et al.  Myocardial beta-adrenoceptor down-regulation early after infarction is associated with long-term incidence of congestive heart failure. , 2010, European heart journal.

[13]  Antti Saraste,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of myocardial infarction and viability , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[14]  M. Schalij,et al.  Multimodality imaging in interventional cardiology , 2012, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[15]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Integrated PET/CT for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a feasibility study. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Daniel S Berman,et al.  Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  D. Berman,et al.  The economic consequences of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of precatheterization ischemia. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Multicenter Study Group. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  L. Husmann,et al.  Long-term prognostic value of left ventricular dyssynchrony assessment by phase analysis from myocardial perfusion imaging , 2010, Heart.

[19]  James R. Johnson,et al.  The study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in CAD (SPARC): design, rationale, and baseline patient characteristics of a prospective, multicenter observational registry comparing PET, SPECT, and CTA for resource utilization and clinical outcomes , 2009, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[20]  J. Stehli,et al.  Registry for the Evaluation of the PROgnostic value of a novel integrated imaging approach combining Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography with coronary calcification imaging (REPROSPECT). , 2013, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[21]  M. Reiser,et al.  Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results of 1,764 patients. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  N. Avril,et al.  Defining the success of cardiac gene therapy: how can nuclear imaging contribute? , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[23]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  伊沢 正実,et al.  Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 1961 .

[25]  T. Lüscher,et al.  Impact of cardiac hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography imaging on choice of treatment strategy in coronary artery disease , 2011, European heart journal.

[26]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. , 2008, European heart journal.

[27]  M. Miyagawa,et al.  Noninvasive characterization of myocardial molecular interventions by integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  Mark A. Hlatky,et al.  ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring By Computed Tomography in Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and in Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain , 2007 .

[29]  J. Rudd,et al.  Radiotracer imaging of atherosclerotic plaque biology. , 2009, Cardiology clinics.

[30]  Takahiro Higuchi,et al.  Cardiac positron emission tomography. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  Oliver Gaemperli,et al.  New reconstruction algorithm allows shortened acquisition time for myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[32]  Moyses Szklo,et al.  Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  P. Kaufmann,et al.  Lower dose and shorter acquisition: Pushing the boundaries of myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2011, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[34]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Patient-Specific Modeling of Blood Flow and Pressure in Human Coronary Arteries , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  H. Otero,et al.  Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography , 2008, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[36]  B. Hesse,et al.  Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC) , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[37]  Mehrbod S. Javadi,et al.  Definition of Vascular Territories on Myocardial Perfusion Images by Integration with True Coronary Anatomy: A Hybrid PET/CT Analysis , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  Kazuo Awai,et al.  Initial experience with X-ray ct based attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion spect imaging using a combined spect/ct system , 2005, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[39]  L. Husmann,et al.  Very high coronary calcium score unmasks obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with normal SPECT MPI , 2011, Heart.

[40]  Nikola Jagic,et al.  Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  D. Berman,et al.  Clinical outcomes after both coronary calcium scanning and exercise myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[42]  W. Kalender,et al.  Image quality of ultra-low radiation exposure coronary CT angiography with an effective dose <0.1 mSv using high-pitch spiral acquisition and raw data-based iterative reconstruction , 2013, European Radiology.

[43]  Hirofumi Anno,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[44]  N. Paul,et al.  Perioperative β-Blockers : Use With Caution Perioperative β Blockers in Patients Having Non-Cardiac Surgery : A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[45]  Marc Dewey,et al.  Comparison of multislice computed tomography with intravascular ultrasound for detection and characterization of coronary artery plaques: a systematic review. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[46]  M. Reiser,et al.  Sixty-four slice spiral CT angiography does not predict the functional relevance of coronary artery stenoses in patients with stable angina , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[47]  Rafael Beyar,et al.  Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[48]  F. Eberli,et al.  Functionally relevant coronary artery disease: comparison of 64-section CT angiography with myocardial perfusion SPECT. , 2008, Radiology.

[49]  C. White,et al.  Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[50]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionucl , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[51]  A. Iskandrian,et al.  Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[52]  R. Morin,et al.  Expert Consensus Document 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents , 2010 .

[53]  Oliver Gaemperli,et al.  Non-invasive anatomic and functional imaging of vascular inflammation and unstable plaque. , 2012, European heart journal.

[54]  V. Treyer,et al.  Ultrafast nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging on a new gamma camera with semiconductor detector technique: first clinical validation , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[55]  Valerie Treyer,et al.  Nuclear Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with a Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride Detector Technique: Optimized Protocol for Scan Time Reduction , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[56]  N. Magosaki,et al.  3D Assessment of myocardial perfusion parameter combined with 3D reconstructed coronary artery tree from digital coronary angiograms , 2000, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[57]  P. J. Ell,et al.  Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[58]  G. Mancia,et al.  Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the task force on the management of stable angina pectoris of the European society of cardiology. , 2006, European heart journal.

[59]  Anja Hennemuth,et al.  3D Fusion of Functional Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography: Accuracy and Added Clinical Value , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[60]  Richard D. White,et al.  Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging results from SPARC (Study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease). , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[61]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[62]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[63]  William Wijns,et al.  Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. , 2007, Radiology.

[64]  B. Gersh,et al.  Angiographic Versus Functional Severity of Coronary Artery Stenoses in the FAME Study: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation , 2011 .

[65]  Stephan G Nekolla,et al.  Cardiovascular molecular imaging: an overview. , 2009, Cardiovascular research.

[66]  W. Howard,et al.  Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease , 2008 .

[67]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode , 2010, Heart.

[68]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  CT attenuation correction for myocardial perfusion quantification using a PET/CT hybrid scanner. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[69]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. , 2012, JAMA.

[70]  Terrence D. Ruddy,et al.  Potential utility of rubidium 82 pet quantification in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[71]  Maria Mori Brooks,et al.  A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[72]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyFractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study , 2010 .

[73]  Lars Stegger,et al.  Isochronous Assessment of Cardiac Metabolism and Function in Mice Using Hybrid PET/MRI , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[74]  Guido Germano,et al.  Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy , 2008, Circulation.

[75]  D. Watson,et al.  Comparison between angiography and fractional flow reserve versus single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging for determining lesion significance in patients with multivessel coronary disease. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[76]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[77]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography indicates complexity of percutaneous coronary interventions. , 2012, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[78]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  Cardiac Image Fusion from Stand-Alone SPECT and CT: Clinical Experience , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[79]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2010, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[80]  Guido Germano,et al.  Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. , 2011, European heart journal.

[81]  M. Roizen,et al.  Ionizing Radiation in Cardiac Imaging: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention , 2010 .

[82]  Anja Hennemuth,et al.  Image fusion of coronary CT angiography and cardiac perfusion MRI: a pilot study , 2010, European Radiology.

[83]  Oliver Lindner,et al.  Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT perfusion images with low-dose CT: evaluation of the method by comparison with perfusion PET. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[84]  F. Bengel Atherosclerosis imaging on the molecular level , 2006, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[85]  Akira Kitabatake,et al.  Reduction of coronary flow reserve in areas with and without ischemia on stress perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: A study using oxygen 15-labeled water PET , 2003, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[86]  G. Diamond,et al.  Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[87]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  The napkin-ring sign: CT signature of high-risk coronary plaques? , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[88]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Advances in Nuclear Cardiac Instrumentation with a View Towards Reduced Radiation Exposure , 2012, Current Cardiology Reports.

[89]  Oliver Gaemperli,et al.  Abstract 3413: Prognostic Value of Multi-slice Computed Tomography and Gated Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in a Cohort of 426 Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease , 2007 .

[90]  M. D. Di Carli,et al.  New technology for noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. , 2007, Circulation.

[91]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  Validation of a new cardiac image fusion software for three-dimensional integration of myocardial perfusion SPECT and stand-alone 64-slice CT angiography , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[92]  D. Berman,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[93]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association , 2002, The international journal of cardiovascular imaging.

[94]  E. Ficaro,et al.  Attenuation corrected cardiac perfusion SPECT. , 2000, Current opinion in cardiology.

[95]  William Wijns,et al.  Experience with revascularization procedures does matter: low volume means worse outcome. , 2010, European heart journal.

[96]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[97]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[98]  A. Davies,et al.  Imaging intraplaque inflammation in carotid atherosclerosis with 11C-PK11195 positron emission tomography/computed tomography. , 2012, European heart journal.

[99]  R. Virmani,et al.  Histopathological correlates of the napkin-ring sign plaque in coronary CT angiography. , 2012, Atherosclerosis.

[100]  H. Sipilä,et al.  Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Accurately Detects Anatomically and Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Disease , 2010, Circulation.

[101]  B. J. Gersh Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy , 2009 .

[102]  D E Kuhl,et al.  Noninvasive quantification of regional blood flow in the human heart using N-13 ammonia and dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[103]  J. Camm,et al.  [Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary]. , 2006, Giornale italiano di cardiologia.

[104]  A. Einstein,et al.  Reduced isotope dose and imaging time with a high-efficiency CZT SPECT camera , 2011, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[105]  Stephan G. Nekolla,et al.  PET and MRI in cardiac imaging: from validation studies to integrated applications , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[106]  J. Rumberger,et al.  Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. , 1995, Circulation.

[107]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  Use of coronary calcium score scans from stand-alone multislice computed tomography for attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[108]  Tracy L. Faber,et al.  Diagnostic performance of fusion of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and computed tomography coronary angiography , 2009, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[109]  D. Kraitchman,et al.  Current Perspectives on Imaging Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[110]  Frank J. Rybicki,et al.  Interrelation of Coronary Calcification, Myocardial Ischemia, and Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate Likelihood of Coronary Artery Disease: A Combined Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Study , 2008, Circulation.

[111]  Bernhard Bischoff,et al.  Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II Trial. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[112]  Neil J Stone,et al.  Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines , 2004, Circulation.

[113]  D. Dey,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Anatomically Guided by Coregistered 64-Slice Coronary CT Angiography , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[114]  P. Kaufmann,et al.  Chapter 8 – Hybrid Cardiac Imaging , 2010 .

[115]  D. Berman,et al.  Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[116]  Mika Teräs,et al.  Clinical Value of Absolute Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion With 15O-Water in Coronary Artery Disease , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[117]  D. Berman,et al.  Adenosine myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in women compared with men. Impact of diabetes mellitus on incremental prognostic value and effect on patient management. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[118]  H. Halperin,et al.  Abnormal sympathetic innervation of viable myocardium and the substrate of ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[119]  Leif E. Peterson,et al.  The coronary artery calcium score and stress myocardial perfusion imaging provide independent and complementary prediction of cardiac risk. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[120]  F. Eberli,et al.  Added Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score as an Adjunct to Gated SPECT for the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease in an Intermediate-Risk Population , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[121]  William Wijns,et al.  Relation Between Myocardial Blood Flow and the Severity of Coronary-Artery Stenosis , 1995 .

[122]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Meta-analysis: Diagnostic Performance of Low-Radiation-Dose Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[123]  G. Beller,et al.  Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[124]  Paul D Stein,et al.  64-slice CT for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. , 2008, The American journal of medicine.

[125]  Juhani Knuuti,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow will reform the detection of CAD , 2009, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[126]  T. Kuwahara,et al.  Incremental value of combining 64-slice computed tomography angiography with stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging to improve noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[127]  C. Wyss,et al.  Left bundle branch block causes relative but not absolute septal underperfusion during exercise. , 2009, European heart journal.

[128]  K. Gould,et al.  Coronary artery disease: Percent stenosis in CAD—a flaw in current practice , 2010, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[129]  L. Husmann,et al.  Prognostic value of cardiac hybrid imaging integrating single-photon emission computed tomography with coronary computed tomography angiography. , 2011, European Heart Journal.

[130]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  The future of cardiovascular imaging and non-invasive diagnosis: a joint statement from the European Association of Echocardiography, the Working Groups on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Computers in Cardiology, and Nuclear Cardiology, of the European Society of Cardiology, the European Associat , 2006, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[131]  Hanjörg Just,et al.  Fusion imaging: Combined visualization of 3D reconstructed coronary artery tree and 3D myocardial scintigraphic image in coronary artery disease , 1999, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[132]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging , 2007, Circulation.

[133]  Matthias F Kriegel,et al.  The napkin-ring sign indicates advanced atherosclerotic lesions in coronary CT angiography. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[134]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[135]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. , 2010, European heart journal.

[136]  M. Pencina,et al.  Improved Cardiac Risk Assessment With Noninvasive Measures of Coronary Flow Reserve , 2011, Circulation.

[137]  Attenuation of Adenosine-Induced Myocardial Perfusion Heterogeneity by Atenolol and Other Cardioselective β-Adrenoceptor Blockers: A Crossover Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Study , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[138]  E. Topol,et al.  Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. , 1995, Circulation.

[139]  Icrp Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60 , 1991 .

[140]  D. Berman,et al.  Comparison of the Short‐Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography , 2003, Circulation.

[141]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionucl , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[142]  S. Neubauer,et al.  Ischemic heart disease: comprehensive evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. , 2011, American heart journal.

[143]  L. Husmann,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography and evaluation of stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography hybrid imaging: comparison of prospective electrocardiogram-triggering vs. retrospective gating. , 2009, European heart journal.

[144]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.

[145]  D. Spevack,et al.  Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computerized tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[146]  L. Husmann,et al.  Semiconductor Detectors Allow Low-Dose–Low-Dose 1-Day SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[147]  A. Arbab-Zadeh,et al.  Assessment of coronary heart disease by CT angiography: Current and evolving applications , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[148]  L. Shaw,et al.  Risk stratification in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes: prospective evaluation of the combined use of coronary artery calcium imaging and selective myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. , 2006, European heart journal.