An empirical investigation into the effect of childbearing on economic wellbeing in Europe

This paper investigates the extent childbearing among couples in Europe affects their level of economic well being. We do so by implementing a propensity score matching procedure in combination with a difference-in-difference estimator. Using data from European Community Household Panel Survey (ECHP), we compare how the impact of childbearing on wellbeing varies among countries. We use several measures for wellbeing, including poverty status and various deprivation indices that take into account the multidimensionality of individuals‘ assessment of wellbeing. Not unexpected we find childbearing tend to worsen the economic wellbeing of households, but with important differences in magnitude across countries. In Scandinavian countries the effect is small and rarely significant, it is strong in the UK and also significant in Mediterranean countries. Depending on the measure of wellbeing, we find important differences among countries that are similar in terms of welfare provision.

[1]  Rajeev Dehejia,et al.  Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies , 2002, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[2]  Sascha O. Becker,et al.  Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores , 2002 .

[3]  M. Ferrera.  IL MODELLO SUD-EUROPEO Dl WELFARE STATE , 1996, Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica.

[4]  C. Whelan,et al.  Income, Deprivation and Economic Strain: An Analysis of the European Community Household Panel. ESRI WP109, June 1999 , 2001 .

[5]  C. Whelan,et al.  2 Income , Deprivation and Economic Strain in the Enlarged European Union 1 , 2005 .

[6]  V. Verma,et al.  Longitudinal Measures of Income Poverty and Life-style deprivation , 2004 .

[7]  B. Cheli,et al.  A’Totally’ Fuzzy and Relative Approach to the Multidimensional Analysis of Poverty , 1995 .

[8]  Shelley M. MacDermid,et al.  Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment , 2005 .

[9]  K. Mayer.  The Paradox of Global Social Change and National Path Dependencies: Life Course Patterns in Advanced Societies , 2001 .

[10]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[11]  S. Mazzuco,et al.  Childbearing and well-being: a comparative analysis of European welfare regimes , 2005 .

[12]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme , 1997 .

[13]  S. Jenkins,et al.  Marital Splits and Income Changes: Evidence for Britain , 1997 .

[14]  C. Glymour,et al.  STATISTICS AND CAUSAL INFERENCE , 1985 .

[15]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator , 1998 .

[16]  Jeffrey A. Smith,et al.  Does Matching Overcome Lalonde's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators? , 2000 .

[17]  S. Jenkins,et al.  Marital splits and income changes: Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey , 1999 .

[18]  A cross-country comparison of survey nonparticipation in the ECHP -ISER working paper- , 2002 .

[19]  Francis G. Castles,et al.  The World Turned Upside Down: Below Replacement Fertility, Changing Preferences and Family-Friendly Public Policy in 21 OECD Countries , 2003 .

[20]  M. J. Bane,et al.  Slipping into and Out of Poverty: the Dynamics of Spells , 1983 .

[21]  Rossana Trifiletti.  Southern European Welfare Regimes and the Worsening Position of Women , 1999 .

[22]  G. Esping‐Andersen,et al.  The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism , 1990 .

[23]  Franco Peracchi,et al.  The European Community Household Panel: A review , 2002 .

[24]  J. Handler.  Social Citizenship and Workfare in the US and Western Europe: From Status to Contract , 2003 .

[25]  S. Zani,et al.  A Fuzzy Approach To The Measurement Of Poverty , 1990 .

[26]  F. Billari,et al.  The Emergence of Lowest‐Low Fertility in Europe During the 1990s , 2002 .