Cost Estimation of Cardiovascular Disease Events in the US

Background: In this study, we developed cost prediction equations that facilitate estimation of the costs of various cardiovascular events for patients of specific demographic and clinical characteristics over varying time horizons.Methods: We used administrative claims data and generalized linear models to develop cost prediction equations for selected cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction (MI), angina, strokes and revascularization procedures. Separate equations were estimated for patients with events and for their propensity score-matched controls. Attributable costs were estimated on a monthly basis for the first 36 months after each event and annually thereafter, with differences in survival between cases and controls factored into the longitudinal cost calculations. The regression models were used to estimate event costs ($US, year 2007 values) for the average patient in each event group, over various time periods ranging from 1 month to lifetime.Results: When the equations are run for the average patient in each event group, attributable costs of each event in the acute phase (i.e. first 3 years) are substantial (e.g. MI $US73 300; hospitalization for angina $US36 000; nonfatal haemorrhagic stroke $US71 600). Furthermore, for most events, cumulative costs remain substantially higher among cases than among controls over the remaining lifetime of the patients.Conclusions: This study provides updated estimates of medical care costs of cardiovascular events among a managed care population over various time horizons. Results suggest that the economic burden of cardiovascular disease is substantial, both in the acute phase as well as over the longer term.

[1]  C. Pashos,et al.  Long-Term Cost of Stroke Subtypes among Medicare Beneficiaries , 2006, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[2]  R. D'Agostino Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  F. Lampe,et al.  The natural history of prevalent ischaemic heart disease in middle-aged men. , 2000, European heart journal.

[4]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Long-term economic outcomes associated with intensive versus moderate lipid-lowering therapy in coronary artery disease: results from the Treating to New Targets (TNT) Trial. , 2008, American heart journal.

[5]  M. Drummond,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of intensive atorvastatin therapy in secondary cardiovascular prevention in the United Kingdom, Spain, and Germany, based on the Treating to New Targets study , 2009, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[6]  L. Goldman,et al.  Forecasting coronary heart disease incidence, mortality, and cost: the Coronary Heart Disease Policy Model. , 1987, American journal of public health.

[7]  Dorte Gyrd-Hansen,et al.  Costs of heart disease and risk behaviour: Implications for expenditure on prevention , 2008, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[8]  J. Holmes,et al.  Lifetime cost of stroke in the United States. , 1996, Stroke.

[9]  S. Ramsey,et al.  An Economic Evaluation of Atorvastatin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[10]  R. D'Agostino Adjustment Methods: Propensity Score Methods for Bias Reduction in the Comparison of a Treatment to a Non‐Randomized Control Group , 2005 .

[11]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Long‐term Survival After First‐Ever Stroke: The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project , 1993, Stroke.

[12]  Marcelo Coca-Perraillon Local and Global Optimal Propensity Score Matching , 2007 .

[13]  D. Huse,et al.  Direct medical costs of coronary artery disease in the United States. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  H. Birnbaum,et al.  Lifetime medical costs for women: cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and stress urinary incontinence. , 2003, Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health.

[15]  Ruth Davies,et al.  The Development of a Simulation Model of the Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease , 2002, Health care management science.

[16]  K. Anderson,et al.  An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. , 1991, Circulation.

[17]  C N Smart,et al.  The incidence and economic costs of cancer, motor vehicle injuries, coronary heart disease, and stroke: a comparative analysis. , 1980, American journal of public health.

[18]  Dean G. Smith,et al.  Cost effectiveness of rosuvastatin in treating patients to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals compared with atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin (a US Analysis of the STELLAR Trial). , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin,et al.  Too much ado about two-part models and transformation? Comparing methods of modeling Medicare expenditures. , 2004, Journal of health economics.

[20]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[21]  A Hofman,et al.  The prognosis of heart failure in the general population: The Rotterdam Study. , 2001, European heart journal.

[22]  K. Anderson,et al.  Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. , 1991, American heart journal.

[23]  Bhash Naidoo,et al.  The Development of a Simulation Model of Primary Prevention Strategies for Coronary Heart Disease , 2002, Health care management science.

[24]  R B D'Agostino,et al.  Primary and subsequent coronary risk appraisal: new results from the Framingham study. , 2000, American heart journal.

[25]  Brown Wv Framingham Heart Study. , 2011, Journal of clinical lipidology.

[26]  M. Abrahamowicz,et al.  The benefits of treating hyperlipidemia to prevent coronary heart disease. Estimating changes in life expectancy and morbidity. , 1992, JAMA.

[27]  J. Mullahy Much Ado About Two: Reconsidering Retransformation and the Two-Part Model in Health Economics , 1998, Journal of health economics.