Visual statistical learning is related to natural language ability in adults: An ERP study

HighlightsRelationship between sequential learning and language performance.Visual sequential learning task.Sequential learning was assessed through event‐related potentials.Receptive vocabulary, syntactic processing, and word prediction in sentences.Sequential learning depends on language performance. ABSTRACT Statistical learning (SL) is believed to enable language acquisition by allowing individuals to learn regularities within linguistic input. However, neural evidence supporting a direct relationship between SL and language ability is scarce. We investigated whether there are associations between event‐related potential (ERP) correlates of SL and language abilities while controlling for the general level of selective attention. Seventeen adults completed tests of visual SL, receptive vocabulary, grammatical ability, and sentence completion. Response times and ERPs showed that SL is related to receptive vocabulary and grammatical ability. ERPs indicated that the relationship between SL and grammatical ability was independent of attention while the association between SL and receptive vocabulary depended on attention. The implications of these dissociative relationships in terms of underlying mechanisms of SL and language are discussed. These results further elucidate the cognitive nature of the links between SL mechanisms and language abilities.

[1]  G. Mulder,et al.  When syntax meets semantics. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[2]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  Co-localization of Stroop and Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in Broca's Area: Implications for the Neural Basis of Sentence Processing , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  P McGeorge,et al.  The relationships between psychometric intelligence and learning in an explicit and an implicit task. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  M. Goldsmith,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .

[5]  P. Kuhl.  Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Statistical learning is related to early literacy-related skills , 2015, Reading and writing.

[7]  Yehoshua Tsal,et al.  The Wide Attentional Window , 2003, Journal of learning disabilities.

[8]  Christopher M. Conway,et al.  Neurocognitive Basis of Implicit Learning of Sequential Structure and Its Relation to Language Processing , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  E. Crone,et al.  Dissociation of response conflict, attentional selection, and expectancy with functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  M. Ullman.  Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model , 2004, Cognition.

[11]  R. Verleger.  Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3 , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Statistical Learning Across Development: Flexible Yet Constrained , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[14]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  K. Morgan‐Short,et al.  Declarative and procedural memory as individual differences in second language acquisition* , 2013, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[16]  Christopher M. Conway,et al.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of statistical-sequential learning: what do event-related potentials tell us? , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[17]  Noam Chomsky.  Language and Other Cognitive Systems. What Is Special About Language? , 2011 .

[18]  Janne von Koss Torkildsen,et al.  Advancing Our Understanding of the Link between Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition: The Need for Longitudinal Data , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[19]  Noam Chomsky.  Language and Other Cognitive Systems , 2019, Perspectives on Behavioral Science.

[20]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[22]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Similar neural correlates for language and sequential learning: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2012, Language and cognitive processes.

[23]  Julia L. Evans,et al.  Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[24]  H. Möller,et al.  Reliability and plasticity of response inhibition and interference control , 2013, Brain and Cognition.

[25]  P. Reber.  The neural basis of implicit learning and memory: A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  S. Lang,et al.  Learning effects on event‐related brain potentials , 2000, Neuroreport.

[27]  B. Kotchoubey,et al.  The N400 and Late Positive Complex (LPC) Effects Reflect Controlled Rather than Automatic Mechanisms of Sentence Processing , 2012, Brain sciences.

[28]  J. Saffran.  Statistical Language Learning , 2003 .

[29]  Russell A Poldrack,et al.  Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Christopher M. Conway,et al.  Implicit sequence learning in deaf children with cochlear implants. , 2011, Developmental science.

[31]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Statistical Learning and Language: An Individual Differences Study , 2012 .

[32]  Christopher M. Conway,et al.  Exploring the neurodevelopment of visual statistical learning using event-related brain potentials , 2015, Brain Research.

[33]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[34]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Error and Deviance Processing in Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[36]  E. Newport,et al.  Science Current Directions in Psychological Statistical Learning : from Acquiring Specific Items to Forming General Rules on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[37]  Kara Morgan-Short,et al.  A VIEW OF THE NEURAL REPRESENTATION OF SECOND LANGUAGE SYNTAX THROUGH ARTIFICIAL LANGUAGE LEARNING UNDER IMPLICIT CONTEXTS OF EXPOSURE , 2015, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[38]  Gedeon O. Deák,et al.  Visual Prediction in Infancy: What is the Association with Later Vocabulary? , 2014 .

[39]  W. Walter,et al.  Contingent Negative Variation : An Electric Sign of Sensori-Motor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain , 1964, Nature.

[40]  P. Perruchet,et al.  Implicit learning and statistical learning: one phenomenon, two approaches , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  W. Du,et al.  Implicit sequence learning in dyslexia: a within-sequence comparison of first- and higher-order information , 2012, Annals of Dyslexia.

[42]  C. Gallistel.  Prelinguistic Thought , 2011 .

[43]  R. Aslin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article UNSUPERVISED STATISTICAL LEARNING OF HIGHER-ORDER SPATIAL STRUCTURES FROM VISUAL SCENES , 2022 .

[44]  P. Holcomb,et al.  The N400 in beginning readers. , 2003, Developmental psychobiology.

[45]  L. Gogate,et al.  Invariance detection within an interactive system: a perceptual gateway to language development. , 2010, Psychological review.

[46]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Implicit Perceptual Anticipation Triggered by Statistical Learning , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  A. Fawcett,et al.  Procedural learning difficulties: reuniting the developmental disorders? , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[50]  R. Frost,et al.  Statistical learning as an individual ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. , 2015, Journal of memory and language.

[51]  A. Friederici,et al.  Why the P600 is not just a P300: the role of the basal ganglia , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[52]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Can We Improve Structured Sequence Processing? Exploring the Direct and Indirect Effects of Computerized Training Using a Mediational Model , 2015, PloS one.

[53]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Dyslexics are impaired on implicit higher-order sequence learning, but not on implicit spatial context learning , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[55]  Christopher M. Conway,et al.  Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key , 2010, Cognition.

[56]  E. Newport.  The Modularity Issue in Language Acquisition: A Rapprochement? Comments on Gallistel and Chomsky , 2011, Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development.

[57]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[58]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Statistical learning of language: Theory, validity, and predictions of a statistical learning account of language acquisition , 2015 .

[59]  Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language (casl) , 2022 .

[60]  Evan Kidd,et al.  Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[61]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[62]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  On-Line Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Language Processing , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[63]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[64]  John O. Willis,et al.  Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition , 2014 .

[65]  M. Steinhauser,et al.  A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. , 2010, Psychological review.

[66]  M. Fenske,et al.  Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: evidence from flanker tasks. , 2003, Emotion.

[67]  Arthur S. Reber,et al.  Implicit and explicit learning: individual differences and IQ. , 1991 .

[68]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[69]  Paul H. Jackson,et al.  Lower bounds for the reliability of the total score on a test composed of non-homogeneous items: II: A search procedure to locate the greatest lower bound , 1977 .

[70]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[71]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[72]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiological analysis of context effects in Alzheimer's disease. , 2003, Neuropsychology.

[73]  Alejandro Wainselboim,et al.  An ERP study of structural anomalies in native and semantic free artificial grammar: Evidence for shared processing mechanisms , 2013, Brain Research.

[74]  Aaron J. Newman,et al.  The Influence of Language Proficiency on Lexical Semantic Processing in Native and Late Learners of English , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[75]  M. Kutas,et al.  An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[76]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Can we enhance domain-general learning abilities to improve language function? , 2011 .

[77]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[78]  M Eimer,et al.  Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[79]  Derek M. Houston,et al.  Visual Sequence Learning in Infancy: Domain-General and Domain-Specific Associations with Language. , 2012, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[80]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  Speech perception and language acquisition in the first year of life. , 2010, Annual review of psychology.

[81]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[82]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[83]  Joanne Arciuli,et al.  Statistical Learning Is Related to Reading Ability in Children and Adults , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[84]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Implicit, Intuitive, and Explicit Knowledge of Abstract Regularities in a Sound Sequence: An Event-related Brain Potential Study , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[85]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha , 2008, Psychometrika.

[86]  Nick Chater,et al.  The language faculty that wasn't: a usage-based account of natural language recursion , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[87]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[88]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of heterogeneity in visual statistical learning in young children with ASD. , 2015, Developmental science.

[89]  M. Ullman,et al.  Specific Language Impairment is not Specific to Language: the Procedural Deficit Hypothesis , 2005, Cortex.