Social Recommender Systems: Recommendations in Support of E-Learning

Recommendation systems can play an extensive role in online learning. In such systems, learners can receive guidance in locating and ranking references, knowledge bits, test items, and so forth. In recommender systems, users’ ratings can be applied toward items, users, other users’ ratings, and, if allowed, raters of raters of items recursively. In this chapter, we describe an online learning system — QSIA — an active recommender system for Questions Sharing and Interactive Assignments, designed to enhance knowledge sharing among learners. First, we lay out some of the theoretical background for social, open-rating mechanisms in online learning systems. We discuss concepts such as social versus black-box recommendations and neighbors oppose to friends advises. We argue that enabling subjective views and ratings of other users is an inevitable phase of social collaboration systems. We also argue that social recommendations are critical for the exploitation of the value associated with recommendation.

[1]  John DiMarco A Statewide Analysis of Student Web Portfolios in New York Colleges and Universities , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ..

[2]  Gulsun Kurubacak Building Online Knowledge Societies for Lifelong Learning: The Democratic University-Community Partnerships in Turkey , 2007 .

[3]  Shellie Hipsky,et al.  Strategies for teaching students With Exceptional Needs in cyber schools , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ..

[4]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Using the World Wide Web to Build Learning Communities in K‐12 , 2006 .

[5]  Jacob Jan Dijkstra On the use of computerised decision aids : an investigation into the expert system as persuasive communicator , 2006 .

[6]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  QSIA - a Web-based environment for learning, assessing and knowledge sharing in communities , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Michael J. Pazzani,et al.  A Framework for Collaborative, Content-Based and Demographic Filtering , 1999, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[9]  Marko Balabanovic,et al.  Exploring Versus Exploiting when Learning User Models for Text Recommendation , 2004, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[10]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  A Web-Based Chemistry Course as a Means To Foster Freshmen Learning , 2003 .

[12]  R. Selman The promotion of social awareness : powerful lessons from the partnership of developmental theory and classroom practice , 2003 .

[13]  Siu-Ming Yiu,et al.  Content Engineering Agent: A TBL-Based E-Course Development Tool with TQM , 2003, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[14]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  The Nature of Middle School Learners' Science Content Understandings with the Use of On-line Resources , 2003 .

[15]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  Technology Classification Framework for E-Learning Purposes from a Knowledge Management Perspective , 2003, AMCIS.

[16]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Knowledge Networks and E-Learning Clusters of Applications: A Conceptual and Technological Approach of Potential Business Value , 2003, AMCIS.

[17]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  Towards the Semantic E-Learning: An Ontological Oriented Discussion of the New Research Agenda in E-Learning , 2003, AMCIS.

[18]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the Subjective Value of Information in Trading , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Harris Wu,et al.  The architecture of commKnowledge: combining link structure and user actions to support an online community , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Bus..

[20]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning , 2002 .

[21]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Online auctions, messaging, communication and social facilitation: a simulation and experimental evidence , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Jim Clark A product review of WebCT , 2002 .

[23]  A. Kakabadse,et al.  From Tacit Knowledge to Knowledge Management: Leveraging Invisible Assets , 2001 .

[24]  John Riedl,et al.  Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms , 2001, WWW '01.

[25]  Peter J. Bentley,et al.  Building a Lifestyle Recommender System , 2001, WWW Posters.

[26]  Loren Terveen,et al.  Beyond Recommender Systems: Helping People Help Each Other , 2001 .

[27]  John Riedl,et al.  Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations , 2000, CSCW '00.

[28]  Bat-Sheva Eylon,et al.  Designing powerful learning environments and practical theories: the knowledge integration environment , 2000 .

[29]  Antonietta Grasso,et al.  Augmenting recommender systems by embedding interfaces into practices , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[30]  A. Koh,et al.  Review of N.C. Burbules & T.A. Callister (2000) 'Watch IT: The risks and promises of information technologies for education' , 2000 .

[31]  Nicholas C. Burbules,et al.  Watch It: The Risks And Promises Of Information Technologies For Education , 2000 .

[32]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[33]  Frank Linton,et al.  OWL: A Recommender System for Organization-Wide Learning , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[34]  P. Resnick,et al.  The Market for Evaluations , 1999 .

[35]  Jaap J. Dijkstra,et al.  User agreement with incorrect expert system advice , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[36]  David Heckerman,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Collaborative Filtering , 1998, UAI.

[37]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Are computers scapegoats? Attributions of responsibility in human-computer interaction , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[38]  Walter Baets,et al.  Organizational Learning and Knowledge Technologies in a Dynamic Environment , 1998 .

[39]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking , 1998 .

[40]  Ellen Timminga,et al.  Persuasiveness of expert systems , 1998, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[41]  Douglas W. Oard,et al.  Implicit Feedback for Recommender Systems , 1998 .

[42]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Recommender systems , 1997, CACM.

[43]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation , 1997, CACM.

[44]  Bart Selman,et al.  Referral Web: combining social networks and collaborative filtering , 1997, CACM.

[45]  Bradley N. Miller,et al.  GroupLens: applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news , 1997, CACM.

[46]  Fay Sudweeks,et al.  How Do You Get a Hundred Strangers to Agree: Computer mediated communication and collaboration , 1996 .

[47]  David S. Murphy,et al.  Auditor evidence evaluation: Expert systems as credible sources , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[48]  Kate Ehrlich,et al.  Pointing the way: active collaborative filtering , 1995, CHI '95.

[49]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Social information filtering: algorithms for automating “word of mouth” , 1995, CHI '95.

[50]  Lee Sproull,et al.  What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Yoichi Shinoda,et al.  Information filtering based on user behavior analysis and best match text retrieval , 1994, SIGIR '94.

[52]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Time in computerized tests: A multitrait, multimethod investigation of general- knowledge and mathematical-reasoning on-line examinations , 1991 .

[53]  J. Bruner Acts of meaning , 1990 .

[54]  B. Latané,et al.  Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  A. M. Rosenthal Thirty-eight witnesses , 1964 .

[56]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[57]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[58]  International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education , 2022 .

[59]  International Journal of Distance Education Technologies , 2022 .