Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery

Anomaly detection becomes increasingly important in hyperspectral image analysis, since hyperspectral imagers can now uncover many material substances which were previously unresolved by multispectral sensors. Two types of anomaly detection are of interest and considered in this paper. One was previously developed by Reed and Yu to detect targets whose signatures are distinct from their surroundings. Another was designed to detect targets with low probabilities in an unknown image scene. Interestingly, they both operate the same form as does a matched filter. Moreover, they can be implemented in real-time processing, provided that the sample covariance matrix is replaced by the sample correlation matrix. One disadvantage of an anomaly detector is the lack of ability to discriminate the detected targets from another. In order to resolve this problem, the concept of target discrimination measures is introduced to cluster different types of anomalies into separate target classes. By using these class means as target information, the detected anomalies can be further classified. With inclusion of target discrimination in anomaly detection, anomaly classification can be implemented in a three-stage process, first by anomaly detection to find potential targets, followed by target discrimination to cluster the detected anomalies into separate target classes, and concluded by a classifier to achieve target classification. Experiments show that anomaly classification performs very differently from anomaly detection.

[1]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[3]  W. Farrand Mapping the distribution of mine tailings in the Coeur d'Alene River Valley, Idaho, through the use of a constrained energy minimization technique , 1997 .

[4]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[5]  E. Ashton,et al.  Algorithms for the Detection of Su b-Pixel Targets in Multispectral Imagery , 1998 .

[6]  J. Wade Davis,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2003, Technometrics.

[7]  Henry Stark,et al.  Probability, Random Processes, and Estimation Theory for Engineers , 1995 .

[8]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[9]  Alan D. Stocker,et al.  Real-time hyperspectral detection and cuing , 2000 .

[10]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Unsupervised target detection in hyperspectral images using projection pursuit , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Chein-I. Chang,et al.  Discrimination measures for target classification , 2001, IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217).

[12]  C Harsanyi Joseph,et al.  Determining the number and identity of spectral endmembers; an integrated approach using Neyman-Person eigen-thresholding and iterative constrained RMS error minimization , 1993 .

[13]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  An information-theoretic approach to spectral variability, similarity, and discrimination for hyperspectral image analysis , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[14]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  Comparative performance analysis of adaptive multispectral detectors , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[15]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  Remote sensing, models, and methods for image processing , 1997 .

[16]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Real-time processing algorithms for target detection and classification in hyperspectral imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  W. H. Farrand,et al.  Determining the number and identity of spectral endmembers; an integrated approach using Neyman-Person eigen-thresholding and iterative constrained RMS error minimization , 1993 .

[18]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Constrained subpixel target detection for remotely sensed imagery , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[19]  IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL. 34. NO. 4, JULY 1996 Universal Multifractal Scaling of Synthetic , 1996 .

[20]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  Automatic target detection and recognition in multiband imagery: a unified ML detection and estimation approach , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[21]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Adaptive filter theory (2nd ed.) , 1991 .

[22]  Shao-Shan Chiang Automatic target detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery , 2001 .

[23]  B. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1968, Nature.

[24]  Qian Du,et al.  Noise subspace projection approaches to determination of intrinsic dimensionality of hyperspectral imagery , 1999, Remote Sensing.