Quantum annealing with manufactured spins

Many interesting but practically intractable problems can be reduced to that of finding the ground state of a system of interacting spins; however, finding such a ground state remains computationally difficult. It is believed that the ground state of some naturally occurring spin systems can be effectively attained through a process called quantum annealing. If it could be harnessed, quantum annealing might improve on known methods for solving certain types of problem. However, physical investigation of quantum annealing has been largely confined to microscopic spins in condensed-matter systems. Here we use quantum annealing to find the ground state of an artificial Ising spin system comprising an array of eight superconducting flux quantum bits with programmable spin–spin couplings. We observe a clear signature of quantum annealing, distinguishable from classical thermal annealing through the temperature dependence of the time at which the system dynamics freezes. Our implementation can be configured in situ to realize a wide variety of different spin networks, each of which can be monitored as it moves towards a low-energy configuration. This programmable artificial spin network bridges the gap between the theoretical study of ideal isolated spin networks and the experimental investigation of bulk magnetic samples. Moreover, with an increased number of spins, such a system may provide a practical physical means to implement a quantum algorithm, possibly allowing more-effective approaches to solving certain classes of hard combinatorial optimization problems.

[1]  F. Barahona On the computational complexity of Ising spin glass models , 1982 .

[2]  Clarke,et al.  Measurements of macroscopic quantum tunneling out of the zero-voltage state of a current-biased Josephson junction. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[3]  H. Simanjuntak Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling in Josephson Junctions. , 1990 .

[4]  J. Doll,et al.  Quantum annealing: A new method for minimizing multidimensional functions , 1994, chem-ph/9404003.

[5]  H. Nishimori,et al.  Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model , 1998, cond-mat/9804280.

[6]  Rosenbaum,et al.  Quantum annealing of a disordered magnet , 1999, Science.

[7]  T. Hogg Quantum search heuristics , 2000 .

[8]  E. Farhi,et al.  A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP-Complete Problem , 2001, Science.

[9]  P. Joyez,et al.  Manipulating the Quantum State of an Electrical Circuit , 2002, Science.

[10]  T. Hogg,et al.  Experimental implementation of an adiabatic quantum optimization algorithm. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[11]  Elementary excitations in the cyclic molecular nanomagnet Cr8. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[12]  I. Mönch,et al.  Towards molecular spintronics: magnetotransport and magnetism in carbon nanotube-based systems , 2003 .

[13]  G. Aeppli,et al.  Entangled quantum state of magnetic dipoles , 2003, Nature.

[14]  David P. DiVincenzo,et al.  Multilevel quantum description of decoherence in superconducting qubits , 2004 .

[15]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Adiabatic quantum computation is equivalent to standard quantum computation , 2004, 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[16]  P. Santini,et al.  Inelastic neutron scattering study of the molecular grid nanomagnet Mn-[3×3] , 2004 .

[17]  S mixing and quantum tunneling of the magnetization in molecular nanomagnets. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[18]  Stefano Sanvito,et al.  Towards molecular spintronics , 2005, Nature materials.

[19]  Spin dynamics of heterometallic Cr7M wheels (M=Mn, Zn, Ni) probed by inelastic neutron scattering , 2004, cond-mat/0412169.

[20]  Quantum Tunneling of the Magnetization in Molecular Nanomagnets , 2005 .

[21]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Reducing the Dimensionality of Data with Neural Networks , 2006, Science.

[22]  J. E. Mooij,et al.  Quantum non-demolition measurement of a superconducting two-level system , 2007 .

[23]  J. Biamonte,et al.  Realizable Hamiltonians for Universal Adiabatic Quantum Computers , 2007, 0704.1287.

[24]  M. W. Johnson,et al.  Probing noise in flux qubits via macroscopic resonant tunneling. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[25]  K. Berggren,et al.  Amplitude spectroscopy of a solid-state artificial atom , 2008, Nature.

[26]  M. W. Johnson,et al.  Compound Josephson-junction coupler for flux qubits with minimal crosstalk , 2009, 0904.3784.

[27]  G. Torrioli,et al.  Coherent oscillations in a superconducting tunable flux qubit manipulated without microwaves , 2008, 0809.1331.

[28]  Wei Chen,et al.  Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Decoherence in rf SQUID Qubits , 2008 .

[29]  L. DiCarlo,et al.  Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor , 2009, Nature.

[30]  W. Wernsdorfer Molecular nanomagnets: towards molecular spintronics , 2010 .

[31]  Multiphoton excitations and inverse population in a system of two flux qubits , 2009, 0908.2728.

[32]  Yasunobu Nakamura,et al.  Correlated flux noise and decoherence in two inductively coupled flux qubits , 2010, 1007.1028.

[33]  Lu-Ming Duan,et al.  Quantum simulation of frustrated Ising spins with trapped ions , 2010, Nature.

[34]  M. W. Johnson,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a robust and scalable flux qubit , 2009, 0909.4321.

[35]  Xiaoyu Chen,et al.  Comparative assessment of methods for aligning multiple genome sequences , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  M. W. Johnson,et al.  Experimental investigation of an eight-qubit unit cell in a superconducting optimization processor , 2010, 1004.1628.