Impact of EUV patterning scenario on different design styles and their ground rules for 7nm/5nm node BEOL layers

As the IC industry moves forward to 7nm or 5nm node, the minimum pitch of back-end-of-line (BEOL) layers could be near 30nm. Extreme ultraviolet (EUV) could be the most cost effective solution for patterning critical metal and via layers. Patterning of the critical layers would need greater than 4x exposures using ArFi lithography, leading to severe cost and yield issues. There are two potential design options, one-dimension (1D) and two-dimension (2D), for metal 1 layer. EUV’s single exposure option offers superior image quality especially for the 2D design style, but scalability of a 2D design is limited by EUV with a fixed numerical aperture (NA). The single exposure of EUV is an appropriate patterning solution for printing a 1D design directly, but maintaining critical dimension uniformity (CDU) of lines and line-ends is a challenge. Scalability of the 1D design is also limited by the single exposure option. The 1D design can be patterned through a spacer film deposition to gain superior line CD control, followed by printing a cut or block pattern to create the line-ends. Since the minimum pitch of cut/block patterns is generally larger than the metal pitch, EUV’s single exposure option has a potential to print the cut/block pattern at smaller pitch and resolution and offers an opportunity to further design shrink. An elongated via design helps design scalability due to an insensitive overlay error contribution to via-to-metal contact area and encroachment.

[1]  Tsann-Bim Chiou,et al.  Lithographic challenges and their solutions for critical layers in sub-14nm node logic devices , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Hideaki Tsubaki,et al.  Negative-tone imaging with EUV exposure for 14nm hp and beyond , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Guido Schiffelers,et al.  EUV lithography: NXE platform performance overview , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Paul van Adrichem,et al.  EUV source-mask optimization for 7nm node and beyond , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Andreia Santos,et al.  Novel EUV resist materials for 16nm half pitch and EUV resist defects , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Chang-Moon Lim,et al.  Understanding of stochastic noise , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Hideaki Tsubaki,et al.  Novel EUV resist materials design for 14nm half pitch and below , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Robert John Socha,et al.  An innovative Source-Mask co-Optimization (SMO) method for extending low k1 imaging , 2008, Lithography Asia.

[9]  C. Mack,et al.  Stochastic exposure kinetics of extreme ultraviolet photoresists: simulation study , 2011 .

[10]  Mark van de Kerkhof,et al.  EUV lithography industrialization progress , 2017, Photomask Technology.

[11]  Toshiro Itani,et al.  Evaluations of negative tone development resist and process for EUV lithography , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Ramakrishnan Ayothi,et al.  Novel EUV resist development for sub-14nm half pitch , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Marcel Beckers,et al.  Performance overview and outlook of EUV lithography systems , 2015, Advanced Lithography.