Mechanical behaviour of earthen materials: A comparison between earth block masonry, rammed earth and cob

Earth represents one of the oldest construction materials, which is still utilised both in developed and in developing countries. In this paper a comparison of the mechanical performance of structural elements built in three basic techniques, earth block (adobe) masonry, rammed earth and cob, is presented. In order to gain better knowledge on the structural behaviour under static loads an extensive compression and diagonal compression (shear) test campaign was performed. First compression results showed brittle mechanical behaviour in the case of earth block masonry and rammed earth elements, whereas cob exhibited a very different stress–strain pattern: cob can deform beyond the elastic range with a gradual drop in capacity. Despite its low compressive strength, cob thus presents a relatively good performance within the earthen material range as far as shear behaviour is concerned. The data here reported represents a base for a further investigation on the dynamic behaviour of the three materials considered. The study was carried out within the framework of the project NIKER funded by the European Commission dealing with improving immovable Cultural Heritage assets against the risk of earthquakes.

[1]  E. Leroy Tolles,et al.  Seismic studies on small-scale models of adobe houses , 1990 .

[2]  Paul Jaquin,et al.  Analysis of historic rammed earth construction , 2008 .

[3]  J. Morel,et al.  Assessing the anisotropy of rammed earth , 2009 .

[4]  Jeanette Gasparini Erdbebensicherheit von Lehmsteinbauten untersucht für den Standort Oaxaca, Mexiko , 2006 .

[5]  Enrico Quagliarini,et al.  The influence of natural stabilizers and natural fibres on the mechanical properties of ancient Roman adobe bricks , 2010 .

[6]  N. P. Barbosa,et al.  Behaviour of composite soil reinforced with natural fibres , 1999 .

[7]  S. Kenai,et al.  Performance of composite soil reinforced with barley straw , 2005 .

[8]  Peter Walker,et al.  Mechanical and Thermal Characteristics of Rammed Earth , 2007 .

[9]  Richard Přikryl,et al.  Materials, Technologies and Practice in Historic Heritage Structures , 2010 .

[10]  H. Binici,et al.  Investigation of fibre reinforced mud brick as a building material , 2005 .

[11]  Charles E. Augarde,et al.  Historic rammed earth structures in Spain : construction techniques and a preliminary classification. , 2007 .

[12]  Christof Ziegert,et al.  Eigenschaften industrieller Lehmbauprodukte für den Mauerwerksbau und Verhalten von Lehmsteinmauerwerk , 2012 .

[13]  David Lilley,et al.  ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF RAMMED EARTH WALLS WITH OPENINGS. , 1995 .

[14]  Bijan Samali,et al.  AN IMPROVED MEANS OF REINFORCING ADOBE WALLS - EXTERNAL VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT , 2005 .

[15]  E. Sebastian,et al.  Technology of Rammed-Earth Constructions (“Tapial”) in Andalusia (Spain): Their Restoration and Conservation , 2010 .

[16]  J. Vargas,et al.  Seismic strength of adobe masonry , 1986 .

[17]  Peter Walker,et al.  Structural Capacity of Rammed Earth in Compression , 2008 .

[18]  Matthew R. Hall,et al.  RAMMED EARTH SAMPLE PRODUCTION: CONTEXT, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONSISTENCY , 2004 .

[19]  Lorenzo Miccoli,et al.  Charakterisierung und Modellierung der mechanischen Eigenschaften von Lehmsteinmauerwerk – Mechanical Characterization and Modelling of Earth Block Masonry , 2012 .

[20]  Navaratnarajah Sathiparan,et al.  Experimental Study on Unburned Brick Masonry Wallettes Retrofitted by PP-Band Meshes (特集2 持続可能な都市システムの構築をめざして(ICUS)) , 2006 .