Effects of Stimulus Reversals on Lateral Dominance in Word Recognition

In two experiments, eight-letter words and nonsense words, having the letters and the sequence of letters in normal or reversed orientations, were briefly exposed across fixation. Recognition of letters to the right and left of fixation was, on the whole, affected by directional attributes of the stimuli. These results are interpreted as providing evidence for functional factors in the scanning of visual patterns, as opposed to “structural” dominances in the nervous system.

[1]  Friedman Sm,et al.  REVERSAL READING BY ISRAELI OBSERVERS OF VISUAL PATTERNS WITHOUT INTRINSIC DIRECTIONALITY. , 1963 .

[2]  Harcum Er,et al.  PRE- VERSUS POST-KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIRED REPRODUCTION SEQUENCE FOR TACHISTOSCOPIC PATTERNS. , 1963 .

[3]  Harcum Er,et al.  Explanation of Mishkin and Forgays' result as a directional-reading conflict. , 1963 .

[4]  E. R. Harcum,et al.  Letter Recognition within Words Flashed Left and Right of Fixation , 1962, Science.

[5]  H. F. Crovitz,et al.  Tendencies to eye movement and perceptual accuracy. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  J. Ayres,et al.  Directional Response-Bias in Reproducing Brief Visual Patterns , 1962 .

[7]  E. R. Harcum,et al.  Visual perception of binary patterns by preschool children and by school children. , 1961 .

[8]  Bryden Mp,et al.  Tachistoscopic recognition of non-alphabetical material. , 1960 .

[9]  S. Cobb Speech and Brain-Mechanisms. , 1960 .

[10]  H. Terrace,et al.  The effects of retinal and attention on the perception of words. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  W. Heron,et al.  Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[12]  M. Tinker,et al.  Perceptual and oculomotor efficiency in reading materials in vertical and horizontal arrangements. , 1955, American Journal of Psychology.

[13]  D. Forgays The development of differential word recognition. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  J. Orbach,et al.  Retinal locus as a factor in the recognition of visually perceived words. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.

[15]  H. R. Crosland,et al.  A Method of Measuring the Effect of Primacy of Report in the Range of Attention Experiment , 1933 .

[16]  E. R. Harcum,et al.  Explanation of Mishkin and Forgays' result as a directional-reading conflict. , 1963, Canadian journal of psychology.

[17]  E. R. Harcum,et al.  REVERSAL READING BY ISRAELI OBSERVERS OF VISUAL PATTERNS WITHOUT INTRINSIC DIRECTIONALITY. , 1963, Canadian journal of psychology.

[18]  E. R. Harcum,et al.  Monocular and binocular reproduction of binary stimuli appearing right and left of fixation. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[19]  M. Bryden,et al.  Tachistoscopic recognition of non-alphabetical material. , 1960, Canadian journal of psychology.

[20]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[21]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  H. Carr,et al.  The ability of Chinese students to read in vertical and horizontal directions , 1926 .