ANTICIPATING INJURY & DEATH: CONTROLLING FOR NEW VARIABLES ON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HIGHWAYS

This study investigates the relationship between occupant injury and a host of other factors, including traffic and weather conditions present at the time of crash, road design, vehicle type, and occupant characteristics. Crash and traffic-detector data from six Orange County freeways were used in an ordered probit model. Crash outcomes were classified for each occupant, as no injury, non-visible injury, visible injury, severe injury, and fatal injury. Higher design speeds (holding speed limits fixed) and speeding contribute to injury severity, while lighting and pavement surface conditions appear to play no role. Consistent with the literature, sideswipe and rear-end collisions result in less severe injury, relative to other collision types (such as broadside, hit-object, and rollover), while females and older persons are at higher risk of injury. Information on current traffic conditions proved very valuable for injury severity prediction. And a variety of design and policy recommendations can be drawn, to enhance highway design and roadway safety.

[1]  Hoong Chor Chin,et al.  An analysis of motorcycle injury and vehicle damage severity using ordered probit models. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[2]  T F Golob,et al.  An analysis of the severity and incident duration of truck-involved freeway accidents. , 1987, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  D. Schrank,et al.  THE 2004 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT , 2002 .

[4]  D Solomon,et al.  Accidents on main rural highways related to speed, driver, and vehicle , 1964 .

[5]  C J O'Donnell,et al.  Predicting the severity of motor vehicle accident injuries using models of ordered multiple choice. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  J. Goldberg Economic impact of motor vehicle crashes. , 2002, Annals of Emergency Medicine.

[7]  Young-Jun Kweon,et al.  Overall injury risk to different drivers: combining exposure, frequency, and severity models. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  To LDT or not to LDT: Assessment of principal impacts of light-duty trucks , 2000 .

[9]  Gary A Davis,et al.  Is the claim that 'variance kills' an ecological fallacy? , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  W W Recker,et al.  MODELS OF DYNAMIC COMMUTER BEHAVIOR USING LONGITUDINAL DATA , 1995 .

[11]  Joel L. Horowitz,et al.  EVALUATION OF USEFULNESS OF TWO STANDARD GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICATORS FOR COMPARING NON-NESTED RANDOM UTILITY MODELS , 1982 .

[12]  Young-Jun Kweon,et al.  Driver injury severity: an application of ordered probit models. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Applying the Ordered Probit Model to Injury Severity in Truck-Passenger Car Rear-End Collisions , 1998 .

[14]  E R Braver,et al.  Two-vehicle side impact crashes: the relationship of vehicle and crash characteristics to injury severity. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  M A Abdel-Aty,et al.  An assessment of the effect of driver age on traffic accident involvement using log-linear models. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  J A Cirillo,et al.  INTERSTATE SYSTEM ACCIDENT RESEARCH STUDY II, INTERIM REPORT II , 1968 .

[17]  Ted R. Miller,et al.  THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES, 2000 , 2002 .

[18]  C. Lave Speeding, Coordination, and the 55 MPH Limit , 1985 .

[19]  Craig N. Kloeden,et al.  TRAVELLING SPEED AND THE RISK OF CRASH INVOLVEMENT ON RURAL ROADS , 2001 .

[20]  R. McKelvey,et al.  A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables , 1975 .

[21]  H C Joksch,et al.  Velocity change and fatality risk in a crash--a rule of thumb. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.