Spatial based compromise programming for multiple criteria decision making in land use planning

Today, competing land use is continuing to occur in many developed regions. In the Agricultural Development Zone of Western Sydney Region, which is characterised by complex landscape patterns, land use competition is widespread. From a land use planning perspective, identification of suitable locations for a given type of land use is necessary for decision makers to formulate land use alternatives in different locations, based on existing land potential and constraints. For such a region, use of a simple method that implements a categorical system and considers only inherent land characteristics in the analysis is often inadequate to arrive at an optimal spatial decision. The primary aim of this paper is to develop spatial modelling procedures for agricultural land suitability analysis using compromise programming (CoPr) and fuzzy set approach within a geographical information systems (GIS) environment. Five main sets of spatial data for use as decision criteria were developed by using fuzzy set methodology: a land suitability index (LSI) for maximising the land productivity objective; an erosion tolerance index (ETI) for minimising the erosion risk objective; a runoff curve number (CN) for maximising the water discharge regulation objective; an accessibility (RP) measure for maximising the land accessibility objective; and the proximity to water body (WP) for minimising the water pollution objective. An Lp-metric was used in the analysis utilising different strategies with representative indices ranging from a situation where full tradeoff among criteria occurs to a noncompensatory condition. Different weighting combinations were also applied, and decision analysis was carried out by using values ranging from 0 to 1.0, where 1.0 is considered as an ideal point. The CoPr model demonstrated in this paper yielded a promising result, as several different techniques of sensitivity analysis show reasonably good results. Likewise, an overlay of that result with the present land use/land cover indicates a good corresponding spatial matching between existing land use (orchard and cultivated land), and the cells (land parcels) classified as the best in CoPr. The results are amenable to various map display techniques, either using continuous values or by defining different cut off points in the data space within a raster GIS environment.

[1]  L. R. Ahuja,et al.  Infiltration and soil water movement , 1992 .

[2]  D. A. Davidson,et al.  A Land Evaluation Project in Greece Using GIS and Based on Boolean and Fuzzy Set Methodologies , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[3]  G. Hammer,et al.  Impact of soil erosion on production in cropping systems .I. Development and validation of a simulation model , 1992 .

[4]  P. G. Lakshminarayan,et al.  A Multi-objective Approach to Integrating Agricultural Economic and Environmental Policies , 1995 .

[5]  T. L. Chow,et al.  Soil conservation planning at the watershed level using the Universal Soil Loss Equation with GIS and micorocomputer technologies: A case study , 1994 .

[6]  P. Burrough,et al.  FUZZY CLASSIFICATION METHODS FOR DETERMINING LAND SUITABILITY FROM SOIL PROFILE OBSERVATIONS AND TOPOGRAPHY , 1992 .

[7]  J. R. Kiniry,et al.  CERES-Maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development , 1986 .

[8]  SUMBANGAN BAJA,et al.  A Conceptual Model for Defining and Assessing Land Management Units Using a Fuzzy Modeling Approach in GIS Environment , 2002, Environmental management.

[9]  Using Remote Sensing and GIS for Assessing and Mapping Land Use and Land Qualities in the Hawkesbury‐Nepean River Catchment, Australia , 2002 .

[10]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning , 1978 .

[11]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach to GIS-Based Land Suitability Evaluation , 1993, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[12]  R. Young,et al.  AGNPS: A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds , 1989 .

[13]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Multiple Criteria Analysis for Agricultural Decisions , 1989 .

[14]  M Littleboy,et al.  Soil management and production of alfisols in the semi-arid tropics. II.* Deriving USDA curve numbers from rainfall simulator data , 1996 .

[15]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Simulation Methodology for Statisticians, Operations Analysts, and Engineers, Vol. 1. , 1990 .

[16]  R. E. Rallison,et al.  Past, present, and future SCS runoff procedure , 1982 .

[17]  Remote sensing and gis based mapping and modeling of water erosion and sediment yield in a semi‐arid watershed of Morocco , 1994 .

[18]  G. Munda,et al.  Qualitative multicriteria evaluation for environmental management , 1994 .

[19]  Kevin P. Price,et al.  Investigating Grazing Intensity and Range Condition of Grasslands in Northeastern Kansas Using Landsat Thematic Mapper Data , 2002 .

[20]  M. Dilshad,et al.  Evaluation of the USDA curve number method for agricultural catchments in the Australian semi-arid tropics , 1994 .

[21]  David R. Maidment,et al.  Handbook of Hydrology , 1993 .

[22]  D. Dragovich,et al.  FUZZY MODELING OF ENVIRONMENTAL SUITABILITY INDEX FOR RURAL LAND USE SYSTEMS: AN ASSESSMENT USING GIS , 2002 .

[23]  Sumbangan Baja,et al.  Using GIS-Based Continuous Methods for Assessing Agricultural Land-Use Potential in Sloping Areas , 2002 .

[24]  Peter A. Burrough,et al.  Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation , 1989 .

[25]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Rainfall-runoff relationship , 1982 .

[26]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[27]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Integrating Geographical Information Systems and Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Methods , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..