Community-Based Peer-Led Diabetes Self-management

Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a community-based diabetes self-management program comparing treatment participants to a randomized usual-care control group at 6 months. Methods A total of 345 adults with type 2 diabetes but no criteria for high A1C were randomized to a usual-care control group or 6-week community-based, peer-led diabetes self-management program (DSMP). Randomized participants were compared at 6 months. The DSMP intervention participants were followed for an additional 6 months (12 months total). A1C and body mass index were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. All other data were collected by self-administered questionnaires. Results At 6 months, DSMP participants did not demonstrate improvements in A1C as compared with controls. Baseline A1C was much lower than in similar trials. Participants did have significant improvements in depression, symptoms of hypoglycemia, communication with physicians, healthy eating, and reading food labels (P < .01). They also had significant improvements in patient activation and self-efficacy. At 12 months, DSMP intervention participants continued to demonstrate improvements in depression, communication with physicians, healthy eating, patient activation, and self-efficacy (P < .01). There were no significant changes in utilization measures. Conclusions These findings suggest that people with diabetes without elevated A1C can benefit from a community-based, peer-led diabetes program. Given the large number of people with diabetes and lack of low-cost diabetes education, the DSMP deserves consideration for implementation.

[1]  K. Lorig Living a healthy life with chronic conditions : self-management of heart disease, arthritis, stroke, diabetes, asthma, bronchitis, emphysema & others/ Kate Lorig ... [et al.] , 1994 .

[2]  D A Bloch,et al.  Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure. , 1999, JAMA.

[3]  Olga V. Demler,et al.  Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. , 2005, Archives of general psychiatry.

[4]  A. Stewart,et al.  Self-reports of health care utilization compared to provider records. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  W. Katon,et al.  Depression and diabetes: impact of depressive symptoms on adherence, function, and costs. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[7]  J. Cade,et al.  Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[8]  K. Freedland,et al.  The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[9]  A. Stewart,et al.  Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach , 1992 .

[10]  J. Piette,et al.  Patient education via automated calls: a study of English and Spanish speakers with diabetes. , 1999, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  K. Lorig,et al.  Spanish Diabetes Self-Management With and Without Automated Telephone Reinforcement , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[12]  Standards for outcomes measurement of diabetes self-management education. , 2003, The Diabetes educator.

[13]  K. Lorig,et al.  Measurement of pain using the visual numeric scale. , 2006, The Journal of rheumatology.

[14]  J. Unützer,et al.  Monitoring Depression Treatment Outcomes With the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 , 2004, Medical care.

[15]  K. Lorig Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions , 1996 .

[16]  Kor Miedema,et al.  Standardization of HbA1c and Optimal Range of Monitoring , 2005, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum.

[17]  R. J. Johnson,et al.  Perceived health status and mortality among older men and women. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[18]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure , 2002 .

[19]  Judith H Hibbard,et al.  Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. , 2005, Health services research.