Characterization of Optical System for Hemodynamic Multi-Parameter Assessment

Cardiovascular diseases are a growing epidemiological burden in today’s society. A great deal of effort has been made to find solutions able to perform non-invasive monitoring and early diagnosis of such pathologies. The pulse wave velocity and certain waveform characteristics constitute some of the most important cardiovascular risk indicators. Optical sensors are an attractive instrumental solution in this kind of time assessment applications due to their truly non-contact operation capability and better resolution than commercial devices. This study consisted on the experimental validation and a clinical feasibility for a non-invasive and multi-parametric optical system for evaluation of the cardiovascular condition. Two prototypes, based on two different types of photodetectors (planar and avalanche photodiode) were tested in a small group of volunteers, and the main hemodynamic parameters were measured, such as pulse wave velocity and indexes of pulse waveform analysis: the Augmentation Index, Subendocardial Viability Ratio and Ejection Time Index. The probes under study proved to be able to measure the pulse pressure wave in a reliable manner at the carotid site, and demonstrated the consistency of the parameters determined using dedicated algorithms. This study represents a preliminary evaluation of an optical system devoted to the clinical evaluation environment. Further development to take this system to a higher level of clinical significance, by incorporating it in a multicenter study, is currently underway.

[1]  Denis Chemla,et al.  Clinical review: Interpretation of arterial pressure wave in shock states , 2005, Critical care.

[2]  Toshiki Nagasaki,et al.  Clinical utility of heart-carotid pulse wave velocity in healthy Japanese subjects , 2011 .

[3]  L Dolezal,et al.  Parameters describing the pulse wave. , 2009, Physiological research.

[4]  C. Tsioufis,et al.  Subendocardial viability ratio as an index of impaired coronary flow reserve in hypertensives without significant coronary artery stenoses , 2012, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[5]  D. Fitchett,et al.  Noninvasive determination of aortic input impedance and external left ventricular power output: a validation and repeatability study of a new technique. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Xavier Monnet,et al.  SUBENDOCARDIAL VIABILITY RATIO ESTIMATED BY ARTERIAL TONOMETRY: A CRITICAL EVALUATION IN ELDERLY HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH INCREASED AORTIC STIFFNESS , 2008, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[7]  M. Safar,et al.  Arterial stiffness: a simplified overview in vascular medicine. , 2007, Advances in cardiology.

[8]  P. Boutouyrie,et al.  Common carotid artery stiffness and patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients. , 1995, Hypertension.

[9]  M. Crilly,et al.  Indices of cardiovascular function derived from peripheral pulse wave analysis using radial applanation tonometry: a measurement repeatability study , 2007, Vascular medicine.

[10]  P. Boutouyrie,et al.  Assessment of pulse wave velocity , 2008 .

[11]  Thomas H Marwick,et al.  Augmentation Index, Left Ventricular Contractility, and Wave Reflection , 2009, Hypertension.

[12]  A. Siebenhofer,et al.  The reproducibility of central aortic blood pressure measurements in healthy subjects using applanation tonometry and sphygmocardiography , 1999, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[13]  P. Chowienczyk,et al.  Evaluation of Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity: Influence of Timing Algorithm and Heart Rate , 2005, Hypertension.

[14]  Vânia Almeida,et al.  Signal Analysis in a New Optical Pulse Waveform Profiler for Cardiovascular Applications , 2011 .

[15]  João Cardoso,et al.  Non-contact Pulse Wave Velocity Assessment Using Optical Methods , 2011, BIOSTEC.

[16]  A. Weissler,et al.  Relationships between left ventricular ejection time, stroke volume, and heart rate in normal individuals and patients with cardiovascular disease. , 1961, American heart journal.

[17]  O Istratoaie,et al.  CENTRAL AORTIC PRESSURE ESTIMATED BY RADIAL APPLANATION TONOMETRY IN HYPERTENSIVE PULMONARY OEDEMA: PP.8.331 , 2010 .

[18]  Mark Butlin,et al.  Arterial blood pressure measurement and pulse wave analysis—their role in enhancing cardiovascular assessment , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[19]  Sadik Kara,et al.  Investigation of a new heart contractility power parameter , 2004, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[20]  J. Blacher,et al.  Aortic pulse wave velocity as a marker of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients. , 1999, Hypertension.

[21]  G. Laine,et al.  Change in (dP/dt)max as an index of myocardial microvascular permeability. , 1987, Circulation research.

[22]  R. Payne,et al.  Augmentation index assessed by applanation tonometry is elevated in Marfan Syndrome , 2007, Journal of cardiothoracic surgery.

[23]  A. Tajik,et al.  Noninvasive measurement of central vascular pressures with arterial tonometry: clinical revival of the pulse pressure waveform? , 2010, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[24]  A. Weissler,et al.  Systolic Time Intervals in Heart Failure in Man , 1968, Circulation.

[25]  João Cardoso,et al.  Optical Methods for Local Pulse Wave Velocity Assessment , 2011, BIOSIGNALS.

[26]  I.K. Holfort,et al.  Pulse wave velocity in the carotid artery , 2008, 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[27]  Nikos Stergiopulos,et al.  An ultrasound-based method for determining pulse wave velocity in superficial arteries. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  Carole Rudra,et al.  First-trimester mean arterial pressure and risk of preeclampsia. , 2007, American journal of hypertension.

[29]  D. Webb,et al.  The influence of heart rate on augmentation index and central arterial pressure in humans , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  Koen D Reesink,et al.  Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Stiffness Should Discriminate Between Systolic and Diastolic Pressure Ranges , 2010, Hypertension.

[31]  Yasmin,et al.  Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: ‘establishing normal and reference values’ , 2010, European heart journal.