Patient Specific Modeling of Musculoskeletal Fractures

Choosing and executing an optimal treatment plan for skeletal fractures in clinical practice is a complex procedure. Treatment decisions are often qualitative, based on general guidelines and experience/training of the orthopedic surgeons. Despite its potential to assist in quantifying fracture fixation and thus improve patient outcome, computational patient-specific modeling for selection and planning of fracture treatments is limited at present. During the past 25 years extensive work has been reported regarding patient specific finite element (FE) based modeling. Numerous studies have reported on the development, validation and automation of patient specific FE modeling techniques from quantitative CT data sets. However, a patient specific quantitative process that can be applied in a true clinical environment must cope with profound uncertainties such as; material property assignments, surface geometry and most of all uncertainty of in vivo load amplitudes and gait patterns which are usually only roughly estimated. In this chapter we review common techniques of patient specific modeling of bony structures, and present known limitations and sources of error. Method and experimental validation of a new CT based workflow for patient specific modeling of fracture fixation implementing principal strain ratios is presented.

[1]  W. Dock,et al.  [Diagnosis of pelvic fractures: synoptic views of the pelvis versus CT]. , 1989, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[2]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  K. Radermacher,et al.  Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Bjørn Skallerud,et al.  Subject specific finite element analysis of stress shielding around a cementless femoral stem. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  K. Killeen,et al.  CT detection of serious internal and skeletal injuries in patients with pelvic fractures. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[7]  J. Keyak,et al.  Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Patient specific quantitative analysis of fracture fixation in the proximal femur implementing principal strain ratios. Method and experimental validation. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  C J Wirth,et al.  Numerical investigations of stress shielding in total hip prostheses , 2008, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[11]  M. Baumgaertner,et al.  The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  M Doblaré,et al.  Finite element study of intramedullary osteosynthesis in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip: Gamma and PFN. , 2004, Injury.

[13]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Load transfer and stress shielding of the hydroxyapatite-ABG hip: a study of stem length and proximal fixation. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  CT-guided percutaneous fixation of pelvic fractures. Case reports. , 2005, Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia.

[15]  Tracey A. Dechert,et al.  Clinical Examination is Superior to Plain Films to Diagnose Pelvic Fractures Compared to CT , 2008, The American surgeon.

[16]  H K Genant,et al.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. , 1997, Bone.

[17]  Alan G Hannam,et al.  Human jaw and muscle modelling. , 2007, Archives of oral biology.

[18]  J H Keyak,et al.  Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[19]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  M. Bhandari,et al.  A Concept for the Validation of Fracture Classifications , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[22]  W. Hayes,et al.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[23]  J H Keyak,et al.  Estimation of material properties in the equine metacarpus with use of quantitative computed tomography , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  C J Sutherland,et al.  Depiction of Pelvic Fractures Using 3D Volumetric Holography: Comparison of Plain X‐Ray and CT , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[26]  Dennis R. Carter,et al.  Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[27]  Gian Andrea Rollandi,et al.  CT of pelvic fractures. , 2004, European journal of radiology.

[28]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Automated finite element analysis of excised human femora based on precision -QCT. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[29]  Mirko Rosic,et al.  An extension of Hill's three‐component model to include different fibre types in finite element modelling of muscle , 2007 .

[30]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  A. Jurik,et al.  Pelvic fractures. Assessment by conventional radiography and CT. , 1994, Acta radiologica.

[32]  M. Viceconti,et al.  The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[33]  S. Goodman,et al.  Sliding trochanteric osteotomy preserves favorable abductor biomechanics in revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[34]  T. Keller Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  H. Skinner,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  A. Amis,et al.  The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodelling in the proximal femur. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  A. Hill The maximum work and mechanical efficiency of human muscles, and their most economical speed , 1922, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  M. Viceconti,et al.  A modified method for assigning material properties to FE models of bones. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[39]  D R Sumner,et al.  Adaptive bone remodeling around bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: A comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[40]  T M Keaveny,et al.  The dependence of shear failure properties of trabecular bone on apparent density and trabecular orientation. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  G. Niebur,et al.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  R Huiskes,et al.  A theoretical framework for strain-related trabecular bone maintenance and adaptation. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[44]  F. Traina,et al.  Effect of the initial implant fitting on the predicted secondary stability of a cementless stem , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[45]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  Barbara Reggiani,et al.  Finite-Element Modeling of Bones From CT Data: Sensitivity to Geometry and Material Uncertainties , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[47]  B Reggiani,et al.  Predicting the subject-specific primary stability of cementless implants during pre-operative planning: preliminary validation of subject-specific finite-element models. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[48]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[49]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[50]  M. Liebergall,et al.  Optimal fixation of acute scaphoid fractures: finite element analysis. , 2010, The Journal of hand surgery.

[51]  A Horsman,et al.  Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[52]  D R Sumner,et al.  Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[53]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[54]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[55]  J. Galante,et al.  ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[56]  D S Barker,et al.  Validation of a finite element model of the human metacarpal. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[57]  J H Keyak,et al.  Validation of an automated method of three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[58]  M. Baumgaertner,et al.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[59]  W E Bolch,et al.  Marching cube algorithm: review and trilinear interpolation adaptation for image-based dosimetric models. , 2003, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[60]  R. T. Hart,et al.  Functional adaptation in long bones: establishing in vivo values for surface remodeling rate coefficients. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[61]  L Cristofolini,et al.  A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[62]  W C Hayes,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus and strength can depend on specimen geometry. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[63]  F. Zajac,et al.  Nonuniform shortening in the biceps brachii during elbow flexion. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[64]  M Viceconti,et al.  Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[65]  J H Keyak,et al.  Automated three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone: a new method. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[66]  E. Abel,et al.  A finite element analysis of hollow stemmed hip prostheses as a means of reducing stress shielding of the femur. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.