Digital cameras and domestic photography: communication, agency and structure

This article seeks to open up debate on the nature of communication in digital domestic photography. The discussion locates itself between the putative poles of `digital democracy' and `digital literacy', questioning the communicative co-ordinates of the snapshot and identifying the `idiomatic genres' in which it takes place. The authors argue that digital cameras enable domestic photographers to take `good' or professional-looking photographs and make certain capacities of professional cameras available for consumer use. Conversely, however, they argue that the question of critical understanding of the politics of representation in domestic camera use remains, since technical proficiency is not necessarily always accompanied by analysis. One reason suggested for this is that, frequently, the uses of photography are insufficiently analysed. The article therefore criticizes the idea that (domestic) photography can be understood in terms of `language' without paying due attention to the use of photography to capture the nonverbal.

[1]  M. Botta San Francisco Museum of Modern Art , 1994 .

[2]  Sol Worth,et al.  Studying Visual Communication , 1981 .

[3]  M. Harris Regarding the Pain of Others , 2004 .

[4]  Donald Matheson Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication , 2002 .

[5]  W. Benjamin The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction , 2018, A Museum Studies Approach to Heritage.

[6]  T. Sebeok In what sense is language a 'primary modeling system'? , 1991 .

[7]  B. Latour Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[8]  William J. Mitchell,et al.  What Do Pictures Want?: The Lives and Loves of Images , 2005 .

[9]  C. Pinney,et al.  Photography's other histories , 2003 .

[10]  P. Bourdieu Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[11]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Affordance, conventions, and design , 1999, INTR.

[12]  G. Kress,et al.  Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication , 2002 .

[13]  A. Kuhn,et al.  Family Secrets: Acts of Memory and Imagination , 1995 .

[14]  Martin Lister The Photographic Image in Digital Culture , 1995 .

[15]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[16]  Beth Seaton,et al.  Promotional Culture: Advertising, Ideology and Symbolic Expression , 1995 .

[17]  Snapshots: The Photography of Everyday Life, 1888 to the Present , 1998 .

[18]  Paul Cobley,et al.  The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics , 2001 .

[19]  Cynni Murphy The reconfigured eye: Visual truth in the post‐photographic era , 1993 .

[20]  Thomas A. Sebeok,et al.  A Sign is Just a Sign , 2021 .

[21]  Gabrielle Durepos Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[22]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[23]  M. Butt Image and imagination. , 2000 .

[24]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Communication , 2018, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[25]  Siegfried Kracauer,et al.  The Mass Ornament: Weimar Essays , 2005 .

[26]  Gunther Kress,et al.  Literacy in the New Media Age , 2003 .

[27]  H. Horst,et al.  The Cell Phone: An Anthropology of Communication , 2006 .

[28]  Thomas H. Wheeler Phototruth Or Photofiction?: Ethics and Media Imagery in the Digital Age , 2002 .