The Integration Of Cognitive Instructions And Problem/Project Based Learning Into The Civil Engineering Curriculum To Cultivate Creativity And Self Directed Learning Skills

Creativity and Self-Directed Learning involve higher order metacognitive (or executive) processes and are essentially interconnected. The attitudes and skills that embrace creativity and self-directed learning are specified explicitly or implicitly in the 2nd Edition of Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (BOK2). However, traditional engineering education has paid less attention to deliberately cultivating students’ metacogntion development with explicit instructions based on effective theoretical frameworks from Cognitive Science and Educational Psychology. The efforts of engineering faculty members for helping students to develop their creativity and self-directed learning skills may consequently be minimized. This paper reveals conceptual models of creativity and self-directed learning, as well as motivation, from cognitive science literatures, and explores a new pedagogical model that is built on related theoretical framework and education practice and could be transferable for incorporating BOK2 requirements into civil engineering curricula. The development and implementation of the proposed pedagogical model are presented. Cognitive science literatures suggest that effective development of metacognition requires obtaining not only metacognition knowledge and strategies, but also metacognition control experience over specific cognitive tasks through efforts driven by intrinsic motivation. The creativity and self-regulated learning are essentially interacted attributes and can result in optimal performance and self-efficacy (or confidence), and in return help forming positive attitudes and enhancing intrinsic motivation, which lead to persistent efforts for pursuing further self-directed learning and creativity. There is a synergic cycles among these attributes. Based on cognitive theoretical frameworks, a new Pedagogical Model is proposed to integrate new Cognitive Instruction Model and Problem/Project-Based learning into co-curricular design projects, in which motivation, self-regulated learning, and creativity are synergized to cultivate desirable skills of self-regulated learning and innovative problem-solving for engineering students. The proposed Pedagogical Model has been developed from and integrated into a co-curricular design project in a mainstream civil engineering course through Nanotechnology Undergraduate Education project. The implementation outcomes indicate that all students participated in Problem/Project-Based learning and communicated more with instructors for advice and feedbacks. Most of students were motivated by the intellectual challenge of the course project and actively engaged in their self-directed learning of emerging technology and innovation. They gave positive comments on their experience. The implementation outcomes suggest that the proposed Pedagogical Model can be suitable for involving students in self-directed learning and creativity processes and promoting effective inquiry and use of strategies for development of students’ metacognitive skills in creative thinking and self-directed learning. Future improvement on the implementation of the proposed Pedagogical Model is also discussed.

[1]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  The Innovation Algorithm:TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity , 1999 .

[2]  C. Baillie Enhancing creativity in engineering students , 2002 .

[3]  Winslow Burleson,et al.  Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  Madara Ogot,et al.  Systematic Creativity Methods in Engineering Education: A Learning Styles Perspective* , 2006 .

[5]  Elvin Shields AC 2007-71: FOSTERING CREATIVITY IN THE CAPSTONE ENGINEERING DESIGN EXPERIENCE , 2007 .

[6]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[7]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention , 1996 .

[8]  A. Bandura Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning , 1993, Educational Psychologist.

[9]  Jenny C. C. Chung *,et al.  Promoting student learning through a student‐centred problem‐based learning subject curriculum , 2004 .

[10]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[11]  L.G. Richards,et al.  Stimulating creativity: teaching engineers to be innovators , 1998, FIE '98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving from 'Teacher-Centered' to 'Learner-Centered' Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36214).

[12]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[13]  J. Flavell Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[14]  Trevor Morris,et al.  How to be creative , 2008 .

[15]  L. White,et al.  Lateral thinking , 1997, Nature.

[16]  P. Pintrich The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning , 1999 .

[17]  Oon Seng Tan,et al.  Problem-based learning pedagogies: psychological processes and enhancement of intelligences , 2007 .

[18]  Alan Kay,et al.  Computers, Networks and Education , 1991 .

[19]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[20]  Catherine B. Bruch Metacreativity: Awareness of Thoughts and Feelings during Creative Experiences. , 1988 .

[21]  Mark E. Slama,et al.  Promoting Critical Thinking and Life-Long Learning: An Experiment with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2002 .

[22]  J. Dixon,et al.  Engineering Design , 2019, Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering.

[23]  P. Pintrich A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). , 1991 .

[24]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Rewarding Creative Behavior: Experiments in Classroom Creativity. , 1965 .

[25]  A. Brown Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms , 1987 .

[26]  David J. Therriault,et al.  Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. , 2003 .

[27]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Why People Think Computers Can't , 1982, AI Mag..

[28]  H. Barrows Problem‐based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview , 1996 .

[29]  Karlyn Adams,et al.  The Sources of Innovation and Creativity , 2005 .

[30]  Halizah Awang,et al.  Creative Thinking Skill Approach Through Problem-Based Learning: Pedagogy and Practice in the Engineering Classroom , 2008 .

[31]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Student Differences in Self-Regulated Learning: Relating Grade, Sex, and Giftedness to Self-Efficacy and Strategy Use. , 1990 .

[32]  D. Pesut Creative Thinking as a Self‐Regulatory Metacognitive Process ‐ A Model for Education, Training and Further Research , 1990 .

[33]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[34]  C. Schunn,et al.  Final Report from the NSF Innovation and Discovery Workshop : The Scientific Basis of Individual and Team Innovation and Discovery , 2006 .

[35]  Ali Yildirim,et al.  Relationship Between Achievement Goal Orientations and Use of Learning Strategies , 1999 .

[36]  Karen Lozano,et al.  Enhancing Engineering Educational Outcomes Through Integration Of New Vision For Civil Infrastructures With Nanotechnology Into Undergraduate Curriculum And Its Implementation Results , 2008 .