CT texture analysis of acetabular subchondral bone can discriminate between normal and cam-positive hips

Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine if the CT texture profile of acetabular subchondral bone differs between normal, asymptomatic cam-positive, and symptomatic cam-FAI hips. In addition, the utility of texture analysis to discriminate between the three hip statuses was explored using a machine learning approach. Methods IRB-approved, case-control study analyzing CT images in subjects with and without cam morphology from August 2010 to December 2013. Sixty-eight subjects were included: 19 normal controls, 26 asymptomatic cam, and 23 symptomatic cam-FAI. Acetabular subchondral bone was contoured on the sagittal oblique CT images using ImageJ ®. 3D histogram texture features (mean, variance, skewness, kurtosis, and percentiles) were evaluated using MaZda software. Groupwise differences were investigated using Kruskal-Wallis tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. Gradient-boosted decision trees were created and trained to discriminate between control and cam-positive hips. Results Both asymptomatic and symptomatic cam-FAI hips demonstrated significantly higher values of texture variance ( p  = 0.0007, p  < 0.0001), 90th percentile ( p  = 0.007, p  = 0.006), and 99th percentile ( p  = 0.009, p  = 0.009), but significantly lower values of skewness ( p  = 0.0001, p  = 0.0013) and kurtosis ( p  = 0.0001, p  = 0.0001) compared to normal controls. There were no differences in texture profile between asymptomatic cam and symptomatic cam-FAI hips. Machine learning models demonstrated high classification accuracy for discriminating control hips from asymptomatic cam-positive (82%) and symptomatic cam-FAI (86%) hips. Conclusions Texture analysis can discriminate between normal and cam-positive hips using conventional descriptive statistics, regression modeling, and machine learning algorithms. It has the potential to become an important tool in compositional analysis of hip subchondral trabecular bone in the context of FAI, and possibly serve as a biomarker of joint degeneration. Key Points • The CT texture profile of acetabular subchondral bone is significantly different between normal and cam-positive hips. • Texture analysis can detect changes in subchondral bone in asymptomatic cam-positive hips that are equal to that of symptomatic cam-FAI hips. • Texture analysis has the potential to become an important tool in compositional analysis of hip subchondral bone in the context of FAI and may serve as a biomarker in the study of joint physiology and biomechanics.

[1]  Harrie Weinans,et al.  Bone Texture Analysis for Prediction of Incident Radio-graphic Hip Osteoarthritis Using Machine Learning: Data from the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee (CHECK) study , 2019, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[2]  M. Lamontagne,et al.  Patient-Specific Anatomical and Functional Parameters Provide New Insights into the Pathomechanism of Cam FAI , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  Patient-Specific Anatomical and Functional Parameters Provide New Insights into the Pathomechanism of Cam FAI , 2015 .

[4]  Kevin Leyton-Brown,et al.  Auto-WEKA: combined selection and hyperparameter optimization of classification algorithms , 2012, KDD.

[5]  M. Tannast,et al.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Moritz Tannast,et al.  Automatic MRI-based Three-dimensional Models of Hip Cartilage Provide Improved Morphologic and Biochemical Analysis , 2019, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[8]  R. Ganz,et al.  Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  F Eckstein,et al.  Thickness of the subchondral mineralised tissue zone (SMZ) in normal male and female and pathological human patellae , 1998, Journal of anatomy.

[10]  Kenneth D Brandt,et al.  Etiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis. , 2008, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[11]  Wing-hang Kathleen Lau,et al.  Prevalence of radiographic parameters predisposing to femoroacetabular impingement in young asymptomatic Chinese and white subjects. , 2015, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  P. J. Murray,et al.  Quantitative analysis of tibial subchondral bone: Texture analysis outperforms conventional trabecular microarchitecture analysis , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  J. Hodler,et al.  The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  Increased acetabular subchondral bone density is associated with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. , 2013, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[15]  E. Lespessailles,et al.  Subchondral tibial bone texture predicts the incidence of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. , 2017, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[16]  David B. Burr,et al.  Bone remodelling in osteoarthritis , 2012, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[17]  P. Rego,et al.  Cam deformity and the omega angle, a novel quantitative measurement of femoral head-neck morphology: a 3D CT gender analysis in asymptomatic subjects , 2017, European Radiology.

[18]  R. Rose,et al.  Role of Subchondral Bone in the Initiation and Progression of Cartilage Damage , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  A. Kassner,et al.  Texture Analysis: A Review of Neurologic MR Imaging Applications , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[20]  Dragica Bobinac,et al.  Changes in articular cartilage and subchondral bone histomorphometry in osteoarthritic knee joints in humans. , 2003, Bone.

[21]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  Bone density is higher in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement deformities compared to normal subchondral bone. , 2013, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[22]  P Gebuhr,et al.  The prevalence of cam-type deformity of the hip joint: a survey of 4151 subjects of the copenhagen osteoarthritis study , 2008, Acta radiologica.

[23]  Nicholas P. Fey,et al.  Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement—correlations between alpha angle versus volumetric measurements and surgical findings , 2019, European Radiology.

[24]  M. P. Hayball,et al.  CT texture analysis using the filtration-histogram method: what do the measurements mean? , 2013, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[25]  M. Tannast,et al.  Patient-Specific 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based Dynamic Simulation of Hip Impingement and Range of Motion Can Replace 3-D Computed Tomography–Based Simulation for Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: Implications for Planning Open Hip Preservation Surgery and Hip Arthroscopy , 2019, The American journal of sports medicine.

[26]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[27]  P. Beaulé,et al.  Comparison of MRI Alpha Angle Measurement Planes in Femoroacetabular Impingement , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[29]  William H. Harris,et al.  The Etiology of Osteoarthritis of the Hip , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  Scott Lundberg,et al.  A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions , 2017, NIPS.

[31]  J. Vigdorchik,et al.  3D-MRI versus 3D-CT in the evaluation of osseous anatomy in femoroacetabular impingement using Dixon 3D FLASH sequence , 2018, Skeletal Radiology.

[32]  R. Korpelainen,et al.  Assessment of risk of femoral neck fracture with radiographic texture parameters: a retrospective study. , 2014, Radiology.

[33]  E. Radin,et al.  Effects of mechanical loading on the tissues of the rabbit knee , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[34]  P. J. Murray,et al.  MRI texture analysis of subchondral bone at the tibial plateau , 2016, European Radiology.

[35]  W. Youden,et al.  Index for rating diagnostic tests , 1950, Cancer.

[36]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[37]  Michal Strzelecki,et al.  MaZda - A software package for image texture analysis , 2009, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[38]  O. Ayeni,et al.  Hip shape is symmetric, non-dependent on limb dominance and gender-specific: implications for femoroacetabular impingement. A 3D CT analysis in asymptomatic subjects , 2018, European Radiology.