On level sets of marginal functions

The investigation of level sets of marginal functions is motivated by several aspects of standard and generalized semi-infinite programming. The feasible- set M of such a problem is easily seen to be a level set of the marginal function corresponding to the lower level problem. In the present paper we study the local structure of M at feasible boundary points in the generic case. A codimension formula shows that there is a wide range of these generic situations, but that the number of active indices is always bounded by the state space dimension. We restrict our attention to two special subcases In the first case, where the number of active indices is maximalM is shown to be locally diffeomorphic to the non-negative orthant. This situation is well-known from finite and also from standard semi-infinite programming. However, in the second case a generic situation arises which is typical for generalized semi-infinite programming. Here, the active index set is a singleton, and M can exhibit a re-entrant corner or even local non-closedness, depending on whether the Mangasarian-Fromovitz constraint qualification holds at the active index. If an objective function is minimized over M then in the setting of the second case a local minimizer cannot occur

[1]  Alexander Shapiro,et al.  First-Order Optimality Conditions in Generalized Semi-Infinite Programming , 1999 .

[2]  Oliver Stein,et al.  On Linear and Linearized Generalized Semi-Infinite Optimization Problems , 2001, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  Jan-J. Rückmann,et al.  On inertia and schur complement in optimization , 1987 .

[4]  Hubertus Th. Jongen,et al.  On Generic One-Parametric Semi-Infinite Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Optim..

[5]  Oliver Stein TRAP-DOORS IN THE SOLUTION SET OF SEMI-INFINITE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS , 1997 .

[6]  Hubertus Th. Jongen,et al.  Generalized semi-infinite optimization: A first order optimality condition and examples , 1998, Math. Program..

[7]  Hubertus Th. Jongen,et al.  Disjunctive Optimization: Critical Point Theory , 1997 .

[8]  W. Wetterling,et al.  Definitheitsbedingungen für relative Extrema bei Optimierungs- und Approximationsaufgaben , 1970 .

[9]  G. Still,et al.  Second order optimality conditions for generalized semi-infinite programming problems , 1995 .

[10]  W. Hogan Point-to-Set Maps in Mathematical Programming , 1973 .

[11]  Bruno Brosowski,et al.  Parametric semi-infinite optimization , 1982 .

[12]  Hubertus Th. Jongen,et al.  Critical sets in parametric optimization , 1986, Math. Program..

[13]  Alexander Shapiro,et al.  Second-Order Optimality Conditions in Generalized Semi-Infinite Programming , 2001 .

[14]  Kenneth O. Kortanek,et al.  Semi-Infinite Programming: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 1993, SIAM Rev..

[15]  Rainer Hettich,et al.  Numerische Methoden der Approximation und semi-infiniten Optimierung , 1982 .

[16]  R. P. Hettich,et al.  Semi-infinite programming: Conditions of optimality and applications , 1978 .

[17]  M. Kojima Strongly Stable Stationary Solutions in Nonlinear Programs. , 1980 .

[18]  Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber,et al.  Generalized semi-infinite optimization: On some foundations , 1999 .

[19]  Alexander Kaplan,et al.  On a class of terminal variational problems , 1995 .