Cross-Lingual Neighborhood Effects in Generalized Lexical Decision and Natural Reading

The present study assessed intra- and cross-lingual neighborhood effects, using both a generalized lexical decision task and an analysis of a large-scale bilingual eye-tracking corpus (Cop, Dirix, Drieghe, & Duyck, 2016). Using new neighborhood density and frequency measures, the general lexical decision task yielded an inhibitory cross-lingual neighborhood density effect on reading times of second language words, replicating van Heuven, Dijkstra, and Grainger (1998). Reaction times for native language words were not influenced by neighborhood density or frequency but error rates showed cross-lingual neighborhood effects depending on target word frequency. The large-scale eye movement corpus confirmed effects of cross-lingual neighborhood on natural reading, even though participants were reading a novel in a unilingual context. Especially second language reading and to a lesser extent native language reading were influenced by lexical candidates from the nontarget language, although these effects in natural reading were largely facilitatory. These results offer strong and direct support for bilingual word recognition models that assume language-independent lexical access.

[1]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Lexical access in bilinguals , 1979 .

[3]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. , 1994 .

[4]  David A. Balota,et al.  Visual Word Recognition , 2015, Linguistics.

[5]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Subtlex-UK: A New and Improved Word Frequency Database for British English , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Kristin Lemhöfer,et al.  Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[8]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  S. D. Lima,et al.  Orthographic Neighbors and Visual Word Recognition , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[10]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[11]  Kenneth R. Paap,et al.  The case of the vanishing frequency effect: A retest of the verification model. , 1994 .

[12]  V. Kuperman,et al.  Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  J. Kroll,et al.  The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[14]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[15]  Don L. Scarborough,et al.  Independence of lexical access in bilingual word recognition , 1984 .

[16]  Michael Garman,et al.  Psycholinguistics: Accessing the mental lexicon , 1990 .

[17]  T. Dijkstra,et al.  The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. , 1998 .

[18]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Reading transposed text: effects of transposed letter distance and consonant-vowel status on eye movements , 2014, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[19]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model , 1999, Vision Research.

[20]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[22]  S. Andrews The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .

[23]  G. Stone,et al.  Strategic control of processing in word recognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J Grainger,et al.  Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing , 2002, Vision Research.

[27]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition , 2019 .

[29]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  The influence of semantic constraints on bilingual word recognition during sentence reading , 2011 .

[30]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  V. Marian,et al.  CLEARPOND: Cross-Linguistic Easy-Access Resource for Phonological and Orthographic Neighborhood Densities , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .

[33]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Simulating cross-language competition with the bilingual interactive activation model. , 1998 .

[34]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .

[35]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: evidence for nonselective lexical access. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Neighborhood Size and Neighborhood Frequency Effects in Word Recognition , 1995 .

[38]  Stephen J Lupker,et al.  Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  S. Lupker,et al.  Making things difficult in lexical decision: the impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects. , 2010, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[41]  A.F.J. Dijkstra,et al.  The multilingual lexicon , 2007 .

[42]  J. Grainger,et al.  Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition , 1998 .

[43]  D. Drieghe,et al.  Eye Movement Patterns in Natural Reading: A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Reading of a Novel , 2015, PloS one.

[44]  C. Davis,et al.  More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  VERB PROCESSING BY BILINGUALS IN SENTENCE CONTEXTS , 2013, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[46]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Psychology of Reading , 2012 .

[47]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Linguistic and cognitive influences on eye movements during reading , 2011 .

[48]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Using E-Z reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  Wouter Duyck,et al.  Presenting GECO: An eyetracking corpus of monolingual and bilingual sentence reading , 2017, Behavior research methods.

[50]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[51]  Emmanuel Keuleers,et al.  Frequency effects in monolingual and bilingual natural reading , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  The representation and processing of identical cognates by late bilinguals: RT and ERP effects , 2013 .

[53]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.

[54]  Job Schepens,et al.  Distributions of cognates in Europe as based on Levenshtein distance* , 2008, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[55]  David A. Belsley,et al.  Regression Analysis and its Application: A Data-Oriented Approach.@@@Applied Linear Regression.@@@Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1981 .

[56]  K. Sugi,et al.  [Electrophysiological study]. , 1996, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[57]  Guillaume Thierry,et al.  Electrophysiological Cross-Language Neighborhood Density Effects in Late and Early English-Welsh Bilinguals , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[58]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[59]  A Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of "neighborhood size" in reading and lexical decision. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  N. F. Johnson,et al.  A Cohort Model of Visual Word Recognition , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[61]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Using E-Z Reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill. , 2013, Developmental review : DR.

[62]  A. Jacobs,et al.  On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[63]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Cognate and word class ambiguity effects in noun and verb processing , 2013 .

[64]  Susan D. Lima,et al.  Orthographic neighborhood structure and lexical access , 1996 .

[65]  J. Grainger,et al.  Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: cross-task comparisons. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[66]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory? , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[67]  H. H. Clark The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[68]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. , 2008, Psychological review.

[69]  S. Andrews Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[70]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[71]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Does Bilingualism Change Native-Language Reading? , 2009, Psychological science.

[72]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  Previewing the neighborhood: the role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[73]  J Grainger,et al.  Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition: effects of positional letter frequency. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[74]  V. Coltheart,et al.  CHILDREN FIND FRIENDLY WORDS FRIENDLY TOO: WORDS WITH MANY ORTHOGRAPHIC NEIGHBOURS ARE EASIER TO READ AND SPELL , 1988 .

[75]  R. Baayen,et al.  Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words , 2006 .

[76]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[77]  Marc Brys,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009 .

[78]  T. Dijkstra,et al.  The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision , 2002, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[79]  Timothy J Slattery,et al.  Word misperception, the neighbor frequency effect, and the role of sentence context: evidence from eye movements. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[80]  J. Grainger,et al.  An Electrophysiological Study of the Effects of Orthographic Neighborhood Size on Printed Word Perception , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[81]  M Perea,et al.  Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[82]  J. Grainger Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. , 1990 .

[83]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[84]  T. Landauer,et al.  Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition , 1973 .

[85]  J. Grainger,et al.  Recognition of Cognates and Interlingual Homographs: The Neglected Role of Phonology , 1999 .

[86]  Ronald Peereman,et al.  Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sublexical correspondences? , 1995 .

[87]  R. Baayen,et al.  How cross-language similarity and task demands affect cognate recognition , 2010 .

[88]  Roger Boada,et al.  NIM: A Web-based Swiss army knife to select stimuli for psycholinguistic studies , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[89]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[90]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[91]  Carol S. Whitney,et al.  Position-specific effects within the SERIOL framework of letter-position coding , 2001, Connect. Sci..

[92]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[93]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of cross-language effects of orthographic neighborhood , 2008, Brain Research.

[94]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[95]  E Emmanu SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles , 2010 .

[96]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Bilingual Word Recognition in a Sentence Context , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[97]  K. Rayner,et al.  The psychology of reading , 1989 .