Science as systems learning: some reflections on the cognitive and communicational aspects of science

This paper undertakes a theoretical investigation of the 'learning' aspect of science as opposed to the 'knowledge' aspect. The practical background of the paper is in agricultural systems research – an area of science that can be characterised as 'systemic' because it is involved in the development of its own subject area, agriculture. And the practical purpose of the theoretical investigation is to contribute to a more adequate understanding of science in such areas, which can form a basis for developing and evaluating systemic research methods, and for determining appropriate criteria of scientific quality. Two main perspectives on science as a learning process are explored: research as the learning process of a cognitive system, and science as a social, communicational system. A simple model of a cognitive system is suggested, which integrates both semiotic and cybernetic aspects, as well as a model of selfreflective learning in research, which entails moving from an inside 'actor' stance to an outside 'observer' stance, and back. This leads to a view of scientific knowledge as inherently contextual and to the suggestion of reflexive objectivity and relevance as two related key criteria of good science.

[1]  Søren Brier,et al.  Biosemiotics and the foundation of cybersemiotics: Reconceptualizing the insights of ethology, second-order cybernetics, and Peirce’s semiotics in biosemiotics to create a non-Cartesian information science , 1999 .

[2]  R. Bawden,et al.  Systems approaches to agricultural development: The Hawkesbury experience , 1992 .

[3]  C. Kloesel,et al.  The essential Peirce : selected philosophical writings , 1992 .

[4]  Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe,et al.  Researching Alternative, Sustainable Agricultural Systems. A Modeling Approach by Examples from Denmark , 2001 .

[5]  Tom Stonier,et al.  Information and Meaning , 1997, Springer London.

[6]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[7]  Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe,et al.  Does Organic Farming Face Distinctive Livestock Welfare Issues? – A Conceptual Analysis , 2001 .

[8]  M Cabanac,et al.  Emotion and phylogeny. , 1999, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[9]  Jakob von Uexküll,et al.  The Theory of Meaning , 1982 .

[10]  K. Lorenz.  Die Rückseite des Spiegels : Versuch einer Naturgeschichte menschlichen Erkennens , 1973 .

[11]  Andrew Pickering,et al.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[12]  Søren Brier.  Information and Consciousness: A Critique of the Mechanistic foundation of the Concept of In-formation , 1992 .

[13]  S. Kraemer.  Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Gregory Bateson , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[14]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[15]  J. Dewey.  Art as Experience , 1934 .

[16]  R. Ellis,et al.  Three paradoxes of phenomenal consciousness: Bridging the explanatory gap , 1998 .

[17]  Søren Brier.  Cyber-Semiotics: On autopoiesis, code-duality and sign games in bio-semiotics , 1995 .

[18]  Søren Brier.  From second‐order cybernetics to cybersemiotics: A semiotic re‐entry into the second‐order cybernetics of Heinz von Foerster , 1996 .

[19]  Jakob von Uexküll,et al.  A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds , 1992 .

[20]  G. Lakoff.  Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[21]  John Dewey,et al.  Reconstruction in Philosophy. , 1921 .

[22]  Thomas A. Sebeok,et al.  The Sign and Its Masters , 1980 .

[23]  Søren Brier,et al.  What is a possible ontological and epistemological framework for a true universal ‘information science'?: The suggestion of a cybersemiotics , 1997 .

[24]  Alfonso Reyes,et al.  The process of embodying distinctions - a re-construction of the process of learning , 1998, Cybern. Hum. Knowing.

[25]  D. L. Gorlée.  Handbook of Semiotics , 1997, English and American Studies in German.

[26]  Thure von Uexküll.  Introduction: Meaning and science in Jakob von Uexküll’s concept of biology , 1982 .

[27]  C. Peirce,et al.  Philosophical Writings of Peirce , 1955 .

[28]  J. Dewey.  Experience and Nature , 1960 .

[29]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .

[30]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[31]  Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe,et al.  Research, values and ethics in organic agriculture - examples from sustainability, precaution, nature quality and animal welfare , 2000 .

[32]  Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe,et al.  Towards a systemic research methodology in agriculture: Rethinking the role of values in science , 2002 .

[33]  S Brier.  Cybersemiotics: a transdisciplinary framework for information studies. , 1998, Bio Systems.

[34]  J. Dewey.  Logic, the theory of inquiry , 1938 .

[35]  K. Lorenz.  Studies in animal and human behaviour , 1970 .

[36]  N. Halberg,et al.  A systems approach for assessing sustainability in livestock farms , 1997 .

[37]  R. Miettinen,et al.  The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action , 2000 .