How innovativeness relates to social representation of new foods and to the willingness to try and use such foods

The relationship between domain specific innovativeness scale (DSI) and social representation (SR) components of new foods (suspicion of new foods; adherence to natural food; adherence to technology; eating as an enjoyment; eating as a necessity) was explored in a survey with Finnish consumers (N = 1156). Both DSI and SR were used to predict willingness to try/use new foods, categorized into six subgroups of which three were functional (cereal-based and otherwise functional foods; functional drinks), and the remaining three categories were modified dairy products, organic products, and energy drinks. Enjoyment and low suspicion predicted 27% of variation in DSI, which, in turn, predicted up to 6% of willingness to try categories of new foods, excluding organic products. When added to the predictive model, SR components increased the prediction of all food categories, particularly functional cereal-based and organic products (up to 20.4%). Thus, DSI predicted willingness to try new foods to some extent, but SR components, most of all low suspicion of new foods and adherence to natural food, significantly improved the prediction.

[1]  J. Forgas.  Social Cognition: Perspectives on Everyday Understanding , 1982 .

[2]  A. Murcott.  The Sociology of food and eating : essays on the sociological significance of food , 1983 .

[3]  Jonas,et al.  Functional foods: Consumer perceptions in Denmark and England , 1998 .

[4]  A. Beardsworth,et al.  Sociology on the Menu: An Invitation to the Study of Food and Society , 1997 .

[5]  Martin W. Bauer,et al.  Towards a Paradigm for Research on Social Representations , 1999 .

[6]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Pre‐identification of first buyers of a new food product , 1999 .

[7]  K. Deaux,et al.  Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions. , 2001 .

[8]  L. Flynn,et al.  Identifying Innovators in Consumer Product Markets , 1992 .

[9]  Paul Rozin,et al.  Preference for natural: instrumental and ideational/moral motivations, and the contrast between foods and medicines , 2004, Appetite.

[10]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Measuring Consumer Innovativeness , 1991 .

[11]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  Consumer perceptions of food products involving genetic modification : results from a qualitative study in four Nordic countries , 2001 .

[12]  D. Midgley,et al.  Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement , 1978 .

[13]  H. Tuorila,et al.  Willingness to try new foods as predicted by social representations and attitude and trait scales , 2004, Appetite.

[14]  Ronald E. Goldsmith,et al.  Theory and measurement of consumer innovativeness: A transnational evaluation , 1998 .

[15]  M. Kirton.  Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. , 1976 .

[16]  Paul Rozin,et al.  Morality and Health , 1999, Nursing History Review.

[17]  Maria Sääksjärvi,et al.  Consumer adoption of technological innovations , 2003 .

[18]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[19]  J. Wardle,et al.  Development of a Measure of the Motives Underlying the Selection of Food: the Food Choice Questionnaire , 1995, Appetite.

[20]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Group Processes: Dynamics Within and Between Groups , 1988 .

[21]  C. Herzlich.  Health and illness;: A social psychological analysis , 1973 .

[22]  H. Tuorila,et al.  Dimensions of novelty: a social representation approach to new foods , 2003, Appetite.