Frequency modulation atomic force microscopy in ambient environments utilizing robust feedback tuning.

Frequency modulation atomic force microscopy (FM-AFM) is rapidly evolving as the technique of choice in the pursuit of high resolution imaging of biological samples in ambient environments. The enhanced stability afforded by this dynamic AFM mode combined with quantitative analysis enables the study of complex biological systems, at the nanoscale, in their native physiological environment. The operational bandwidth and accuracy of constant amplitude FM-AFM in low Q environments is heavily dependent on the cantilever dynamics and the performance of the demodulation and feedback loops employed to oscillate the cantilever at its resonant frequency with a constant amplitude. Often researchers use ad hoc feedback gains or instrument default values that can result in an inability to quantify experimental data. Poor choice of gains or exceeding the operational bandwidth can result in imaging artifacts and damage to the tip and/or sample. To alleviate this situation we present here a methodology to determine feedback gains for the amplitude and frequency loops that are specific to the cantilever and its environment, which can serve as a reasonable "first guess," thus making quantitative FM-AFM in low Q environments more accessible to the nonexpert. This technique is successfully demonstrated for the low Q systems of air (Q approximately 40) and water (Q approximately 1). In addition, we present FM-AFM images of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast cells acquired using the gains calculated by this methodology demonstrating the effectiveness of this technique.

[1]  Hendrik Hölscher,et al.  Analysis of the constant-excitation mode in frequency-modulation atomic force microscopy with active Q-Control applied in ambient conditions and liquids , 2007 .

[2]  A. Raman,et al.  Comparative dynamics of magnetically, acoustically, and Brownian motion driven microcantilevers in liquids , 2007 .

[3]  S. Jarvis,et al.  Direct imaging of individual intrinsic hydration layers on lipid bilayers at Angstrom resolution. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[4]  Sébastien Gauthier,et al.  Noise in Frequency Modulation-Dynamic Force Microscopy , 2007 .

[5]  S. Jarvis,et al.  Direct imaging of lipid-ion network formation under physiological conditions by frequency modulation atomic force microscopy. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[6]  Masayuki Abe,et al.  Chemical identification of individual surface atoms by atomic force microscopy , 2007, Nature.

[7]  T. Ihn,et al.  Construction of a dilution refrigerator cooled scanning force microscope. , 2007, The Review of scientific instruments.

[8]  John E. Sader,et al.  Coupling of conservative and dissipative forces in frequency-modulation atomic force microscopy , 2006 .

[9]  H. Hölscher,et al.  Increasing the Q factor in the constant-excitation mode of frequency-modulation atomic force microscopy in liquid , 2006 .

[10]  P. Heszler,et al.  Novel amplitude and frequency demodulation algorithm for a virtual dynamic atomic force microscope , 2006, Nanotechnology.

[11]  J. Sader,et al.  Frequency modulation atomic force microscopy reveals individual intermediates associated with each unfolded I27 titin domain. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[12]  John E. Sader,et al.  Quantitative force measurements using frequency modulation atomic force microscopy—theoretical foundations , 2005 .

[13]  Byung I Kim Direct Comparison Between Phase Locked Oscillator and Direct Resonance Oscillator in the Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy Under Ultrahigh Vacuum , 2004 .

[14]  Franz J. Giessibl,et al.  Advances in atomic force microscopy , 2003, cond-mat/0305119.

[15]  B. Gotsmann,et al.  Measurement of conservative and dissipative tip-sample interaction forces with a dynamic force microscope using the frequency modulation technique , 2001 .

[16]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Active atomic force microscopy cantilevers for imaging in liquids , 2001 .

[17]  S. Jarvis,et al.  Frequency modulation detection atomic force microscopy in the liquid environment , 2001 .

[18]  Harald Fuchs,et al.  Conservative and dissipative tip-sample interaction forces probed with dynamic AFM , 1999 .

[19]  A. Oral,et al.  A novel force microscope and point contact probe , 1993 .

[20]  Y. Lyubchenko,et al.  Scanning tunneling microscopy and atomic force microscopy studies of biomaterials at a liquid–solid interface , 1993 .

[21]  D. Rugar,et al.  Frequency modulation detection using high‐Q cantilevers for enhanced force microscope sensitivity , 1991 .

[22]  J. G. Ziegler,et al.  Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers , 1942, Journal of Fluids Engineering.