Comparison of optical-feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy and gas chromatography for ground-based and airborne measurements of atmospheric CO concentration

Abstract. We present the first comparison of carbon monoxide (CO) measurements performed with a portable laser spectrometer that exploits the optical-feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (OF-CEAS) technique, against a high-performance automated gas chromatograph (GC) with a mercuric oxide reduction gas detector (RGD). First, measurements of atmospheric CO mole fraction were continuously collected in a Paris (France) suburb over 1 week. Both instruments showed an excellent agreement within typically 2 ppb (part per billion in volume), fulfilling the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) recommendation for CO inter-laboratory comparison. The compact size and robustness of the OF-CEAS instrument allowed its operation aboard a small aircraft employed for routine tropospheric air analysis over the French Orleans forest area. Direct OF-CEAS real-time CO measurements in tropospheric air were then compared with later analysis of flask samples by the gas chromatograph. Again, a very good agreement was observed. This work establishes that the OF-CEAS laser spectrometer can run unattended at a very high level of sensitivity (

[1]  Paul R. Lowe.  An Approximating Polynomial for the Computation of Saturation Vapor Pressure. , 1977 .

[2]  Variability in tropospheric carbon monoxide over an urban site in Southeast Asia , 2013 .

[3]  E. Dlugokencky,et al.  NOAA/CSIRO Flask Air Intercomparison Experiment: A strategy for directly assessing consistency among atmospheric measurements made by independent laboratories , 2001 .

[4]  E. Mahieu,et al.  Seasonal variability of surface and column carbon monoxide over the megacity Paris, high-altitude Jungfraujoch and Southern Hemispheric Wollongong stations , 2016 .

[5]  Y. Rouillard,et al.  Looking into the volcano with a Mid-IR DFB diode laser and Cavity Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy. , 2006, Optics express.

[6]  D. Romanini,et al.  Invited article: SUBGLACIOR: an optical analyzer embedded in an Antarctic ice probe for exploring the past climate. , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[7]  R. Francey,et al.  Interannual growth rate variations of atmospheric CO2 and its δ13C, H2, CH4, and CO between 1992 and 1999 linked to biomass burning , 2002 .

[8]  Thierry Gonthiez,et al.  Multispecies breath analysis faster than a single respiratory cycle by optical-feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[9]  J. Fourier.  Sub-ppb NO 2 detection by optical feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy with a blue diode laser , 2006 .

[10]  Daniele Romanini,et al.  Fast, low-noise, mode-by-mode, cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy by diode-laser self-locking , 2005 .

[11]  Luca Ciaffoni,et al.  ICL-Based OF-CEAS: A Sensitive Tool for Analytical Chemistry. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[12]  M. Carras,et al.  Optical-feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy with a quantum cascade laser. , 2010, Optics letters.

[13]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Analysis of Present Day and Future OH and Methane Lifetime in the ACCMIP Simulations , 2012 .

[14]  M. Carras,et al.  Optical-feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy with a quantum-cascade laser yields the lowest formaldehyde detection limit , 2013, Applied Physics B.

[15]  Christoph Zellweger,et al.  Evaluation of new laser spectrometer techniques for in-situ carbon monoxide measurements , 2012 .

[16]  F. Chevallier,et al.  AIRS-based versus flask-based estimation of carbon surface fluxes , 2009 .

[17]  Hans-Peter Loock,et al.  Cavity-enhanced spectroscopy and sensing , 2014 .

[18]  Gang Li,et al.  The HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database , 2005 .

[19]  D. Romanini,et al.  Very high finesse optical-feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectrometer for low concentration water vapor isotope analyses. , 2014, Optics letters.

[20]  P. M. Lang,et al.  Distributions and recent changes of carbon monoxide in the lower troposphere , 1998 .

[21]  Philippe Bousquet,et al.  Estimation of the molecular hydrogen soil uptake and traffic emissions at a suburban site near Paris through hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and radon‐222 semicontinuous measurements , 2009 .

[22]  E. R. Polovtseva,et al.  The HITRAN2012 molecular spectroscopic database , 2013 .

[23]  Daniele Romanini,et al.  Optical–feedback cavity–enhanced absorption: a compact spectrometer for real–time measurement of atmospheric methane , 2006 .

[24]  Zoltán Barcza,et al.  Variation of CO 2 mole fraction in the lower free troposphere, in the boundary layer and at the surface , 2012 .

[25]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Tropospheric chemistry: A global perspective , 1981 .

[26]  Daniele Romanini,et al.  Real-time measurements of endogenous carbon monoxide production in isolated pig lungs , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[27]  Laurence S. Rothman,et al.  ROVIBRATIONAL LINE LISTS FOR NINE ISOTOPOLOGUES OF THE CO MOLECULE IN THE X1Σ+ GROUND ELECTRONIC STATE , 2015 .

[28]  Daniele Romanini,et al.  Cavity Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy with Optical Feedback , 2014 .

[29]  Daniele Romanini,et al.  Optical-feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy with an interband cascade laser: application to SO2 trace analysis , 2016 .

[30]  A. Microdrop.  A Microdrop Generator for the Calibration of a Water Vapor Isotope Ratio Spectrometer , 2009 .

[31]  Daniele Romanini,et al.  Development and airborne operation of a compact water isotope ratio infrared spectrometer , 2009, Isotopes in environmental and health studies.

[32]  Daniele Romanini,et al.  A water isotope (2H, 17O, and 18O) spectrometer based on optical feedback cavity-enhanced absorption for in situ airborne applications , 2006 .

[33]  I. Aben,et al.  Decadal record of satellite carbon monoxide observations , 2012 .

[34]  M. Ramonet,et al.  Comprehensive laboratory and field testing of cavity ring-down spectroscopy analyzers measuring H 2 O, CO 2 , CH 4 and CO , 2015 .

[35]  P. Ciais,et al.  High-precision quasi-continuous atmospheric greenhouse gas measurements at Trainou tower (Orléans forest, France) , 2014 .

[36]  J. Burrows,et al.  Peroxy radical detection for airborne atmospheric measurements using absorption spectroscopy of NO 2 , 2014 .

[37]  Daniele Romanini,et al.  High resolution measurements of carbon monoxide along a late Holocene Greenland ice core: evidence for in situ production , 2013 .

[38]  D. Romanini,et al.  Sub-ppb NO2 detection by optical feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy with a blue diode laser , 2006 .

[39]  R. G. Derwenta,et al.  Black carbon aerosol and carbon monoxide in European regionally polluted air masses at Mace Head, Ireland during 1995–1998 , 2001 .

[40]  C. Yver.  Estimation des sources et puits du dihydrogène troposphérique : développements instrumentaux, mesures atmosphériques et assimilation variationnelle , 2010 .

[41]  Grant A. D. Ritchie,et al.  Optical feedback cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy with a 3.24 μm interband cascade laser , 2015 .

[42]  P. Ciais,et al.  Variability and budget of CO 2 in Europe: analysis of the CAATER airborne campaigns – Part 1: Observed variability , 2010 .

[43]  P. Novelli,et al.  Reevaluation of the NOAA/CMDL carbon monoxide reference scale and comparisons with CO reference gases at NASA-Langley and the Fraunhofer Institut , 1994 .

[44]  Colm Sweeney,et al.  Accurate measurements of carbon monoxide in humid air using the cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) technique , 2012 .

[45]  Jean-Luc Attié,et al.  Tropospheric carbon monoxide variability from AIRS under clear and cloudy conditions , 2013 .

[46]  C. Buizert,et al.  Local artifacts in ice core methane records caused by layered bubble trapping and in situ production: a multi-site investigation , 2016 .