Is there Room for Ethics within Bioinformatics Education?

When bioinformatics education is considered, several issues are addressed. At the undergraduate level, the main issue revolves around conveying information from two main and different fields: biology and computer science. At the graduate level, the main issue is bridging the gap between biology students and computer science students. However, there is an educational component that is rarely addressed within the context of bioinformatics education: the ethics component. Here, a different perspective is provided on bioinformatics education, and the current status of ethics is analyzed within the existing bioinformatics programs. Analysis of the existing undergraduate and graduate programs, in both Europe and the United States, reveals the minimal attention given to ethics within bioinformatics education. Given that bioinformaticians speedily and effectively shape the biomedical sciences and hence their implications for society, here redesigning of the bioinformatics curricula is suggested in order to integrate the necessary ethics education. Unique ethical problems awaiting bioinformaticians and bioinformatics ethics as a separate field of study are discussed. In addition, a template for an "Ethics in Bioinformatics" course is provided.

[1]  Penelope K Manasco.  Ethical and legal aspects of applied genomic technologies: practical solutions. , 2005, Current molecular medicine.

[2]  William Hersh,et al.  Educating 10, 000 informaticians by 2010: The AMIA 10 × 10 program , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[3]  J. Booth,et al.  Instructors' Practices in and Attitudes Toward Teaching Ethics in the Genetics Classroom , 2004, Genetics.

[4]  Todd R. Johnson,et al.  What is biomedical informatics? , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[5]  D. Gurwitz,et al.  Personal genomics services: whose genomes? , 2009, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[6]  Russ B. Altman,et al.  Biomedical informatics training at Stanford in the 21st century , 2007, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[7]  Kei-Hoi Cheung,et al.  An interdepartmental Ph.D. program in computational biology and bioinformatics: The Yale perspective , 2007, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[8]  K. Wasson.  Direct-to-Consumer Genomics and Research Ethics: Should a More Robust Informed Consent Process Be Included? , 2009, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[9]  Youping Deng,et al.  Promoting synergistic research and education in genomics and bioinformatics , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[10]  C. Patch,et al.  Direct to consumer genetic tests , 2009, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[11]  Kenneth W Goodman,et al.  Bioethics, Business Ethics, and Science: Bioinformatics and the Future of Healthcare , 2008, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

[12]  Eric M Meslin,et al.  Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus Statement , 2008, PLoS biology.

[13]  A. McGuire,et al.  Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[14]  K. Triman,et al.  Resources and strategies to integrate the study of ethical, legal, and social implications of genetics into the undergraduate curriculum. , 2009, Advances in genetics.

[15]  P. Pevzner,et al.  Computing Has Changed Biology—Biology Education Must Catch Up , 2009, Science.

[16]  Amy L. McGuire,et al.  An unwelcome side effect of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: raiding the medical commons. , 2008, JAMA.