Quantitative Element-Sensitive Analysis of Individual Nanoobjects.

A reliable and quantitative material analysis is crucial for assessing new technological processes, especially to facilitate a quantitative understanding of advanced material properties at the nanoscale. To this end, X-ray fluorescence microscopy techniques can offer an element-sensitive and non-destructive tool for the investigation of a wide range of nanotechnological materials. Since X-ray radiation provides information depths of up to the microscale, even stratified or buried arrangements are easily accessible without invasive sample preparation. However, in terms of the quantification capabilities, these approaches are usually restricted to a qualitative or semi-quantitative analysis at the nanoscale. Relying on comparable reference nanomaterials is often not straightforward or impossible because the development of innovative nanomaterials has proven to be more fast-paced than any development process for appropriate reference materials. The present work corroborates that a traceable quantification of individual nanoobjects can be realized by means of an X-ray fluorescence microscope when utilizing rather conventional but well-calibrated instrumentation instead of reference materials. As a proof of concept, the total number of atoms forming a germanium nanoobject is quantified using soft X-ray radiation. Furthermore, complementary dimensional parameters of such objects are reconstructed.

[1]  B. Beckhoff Traceable Characterization of Nanomaterials by X-ray Spectrometry Using Calibrated Instrumentation , 2022, Nanomaterials.

[2]  M. Bechelany,et al.  Review on Natural, Incidental, Bioinspired, and Engineered Nanomaterials: History, Definitions, Classifications, Synthesis, Properties, Market, Toxicities, Risks, and Regulations , 2022, Nanomaterials.

[3]  R. Loo,et al.  Simultaneous Dimensional and Analytical Characterization of Ordered Nanostructures. , 2021, Small.

[4]  J. Conde,et al.  Facts and Figures on Materials Science and Nanotechnology Progress and Investment. , 2021, ACS nano.

[5]  Joseph J. Richardson,et al.  X-ray-Based Techniques to Study the Nano–Bio Interface , 2021, ACS nano.

[6]  F. Siewert,et al.  Shape- and Element-Sensitive Reconstruction of Periodic Nanostructures with Grazing Incidence X-ray Fluorescence Analysis and Machine Learning , 2021, Nanomaterials.

[7]  B. Kanngießer,et al.  Grazing Emission X‐Ray Fluorescence: Novel Concepts and Applications for Nano‐Analytics , 2020, physica status solidi (b).

[8]  M. Cotte,et al.  Metal‐Specific Biomaterial Accumulation in Human Peri‐Implant Bone and Bone Marrow , 2020, Advanced science.

[9]  G. Dai,et al.  Accurate tip characterization in critical dimension atomic force microscopy , 2020, Measurement Science and Technology.

[10]  Xianghui Xiao,et al.  Emerging X-ray imaging technologies for energy materials , 2020 .

[11]  Kevin J. Wilkinson,et al.  Key challenges for evaluation of the safety of engineered nanomaterials , 2020 .

[12]  Seungho Kim,et al.  Thickness-controlled black phosphorus tunnel field-effect transistor for low-power switches , 2020, Nature Nanotechnology.

[13]  Yi Cui,et al.  Energy storage: The future enabled by nanomaterials , 2019, Science.

[14]  Á. Ríos,et al.  Analytical metrology for nanomaterials: Present achievements and future challenges. , 2019, Analytica chimica acta.

[15]  M. Badaroglu,et al.  Metrology for the next generation of semiconductor devices , 2018, Nature Electronics.

[16]  M. Ge,et al.  X-ray Fluorescence Nanotomography of Single Bacteria with a Sub-15 nm Beam , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Hua Zhou,et al.  Quantitative Observation of Threshold Defect Behavior in Memristive Devices with Operando X-ray Microscopy. , 2018, ACS nano.

[18]  Stefano Lagomarsino,et al.  Nanoscale quantification of intracellular element concentration by X-ray fluorescence microscopy combined with X-ray phase contrast nanotomography , 2018 .

[19]  P. Cloetens,et al.  Nanoscopic X-ray fluorescence imaging and quantification of intracellular key-elements in cryofrozen Friedreich’s ataxia fibroblasts , 2018, PloS one.

[20]  B. Kanngießer,et al.  Development and characterization of sub-monolayer coatings as novel calibration samples for X-ray spectroscopy , 2018, Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy.

[21]  L. Lemelle,et al.  Analytical requirements for quantitative X-ray fluorescence nano-imaging of metal traces in solid samples , 2017 .

[22]  J Alexander Liddle,et al.  Nanomanufacturing: A Perspective. , 2016, ACS nano.

[23]  Gaoliang Dai,et al.  Development and characterisation of a new line width reference material , 2015 .

[24]  M. Artemyev,et al.  Comparative advantages and limitations of the basic metrology methods applied to the characterization of nanomaterials. , 2013, Nanoscale.

[25]  U. Panne,et al.  Performance of μ-XRF with SEM/EDS for trace analysis on the example of RoHS relevant elements – measurement, optimisation and prediction of the detection limits , 2013 .

[26]  Nicholas W M Ritchie,et al.  Is scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDS) quantitative? , 2013, Scanning.

[27]  B. Beckhoff,et al.  A novel instrument for quantitative nanoanalytics involving complementary X-ray methodologies. , 2013, The Review of scientific instruments.

[28]  H. Emons,et al.  Reference materials and representative test materials: the nanotechnology case , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[29]  Tom Schoonjans,et al.  A general Monte Carlo simulation of energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometers — Part 5 Polarized radiation, stratified samples, cascade effects, M-lines , 2012 .

[30]  Daniel Foreman-Mackey,et al.  emcee: The MCMC Hammer , 2012, 1202.3665.

[31]  F. Scholze,et al.  Modelling the response function of energy dispersive X-ray spectrometers with silicon detectors , 2009 .

[32]  G. Dai,et al.  A metrological large range atomic force microscope with improved performance. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.

[33]  Burkhard Beckhoff,et al.  Reference-free X-ray spectrometry based on metrology using synchrotron radiation , 2008 .

[34]  F. Scholze,et al.  Measurement of detection efficiency and response functions for an Si(Li) x-ray spectrometer in the range 0.1-5 keV , 2001 .

[35]  D.K.G. De Boer,et al.  Calculation of x-ray fluorescence intensities from bulk and multilayer samples , 1990 .

[36]  Hari Mohan Kuma,et al.  Fundamentals of Nanotechnology , 2012 .

[37]  Jacob Sherman,et al.  The theoretical derivation of fluorescent X-ray intensities from mixtures , 1955 .