A Framework for the Quality Evaluation of MDWE Methodologies and Information Technology Infrastructures

Diverse development web methodologies currently exist in the field of Model-Driven Web Engineering MDWE, each of which covers different Levels of Abstraction on Model-Driven Architecture MDA: Computation Independent Model CIM, Platform Independent Model PIM, Platform Specific Model PSM, and Code. Given the high number of methodologies available, it has become necessary to define objective evaluation tools to enable development teams to improve their methodological environment and help designers of web methodologies design new effective and efficient tools, processes and techniques. Since proposals are constantly evolving, the need may arise not only to evaluate the quality but also to find out how it can be improved. This paper presents an approach named QuEF Quality Evaluation Framework oriented towards evaluating, through objectives measures, the quality of information technology infrastructure, mainly in MDWE methodology environments.

[1]  Tatiana Bondarouk,et al.  Handbook of Research on E-transformation and Human Resources Management Technologies: Organizational Outcomes and Challenges , 2009 .

[2]  Ricardo Colomo-Palacios,et al.  Enhancing the Modern Organization through Information Technology Professionals: Research, Studies, and Techniques , 2012 .

[3]  Teresa Torres-Coronas,et al.  Encyclopedia of human resources information systems : challenges in e-HRM , 2009 .

[4]  Gustavo Rossi,et al.  A survey on web modeling approaches for ubiquitous web applications , 2008, Int. J. Web Inf. Syst..

[5]  The Impact of Telehealth on the Healthcare Workforce: A Global Perspective , 2011 .

[6]  Marilyn Y. Byrd,et al.  Handbook of Research on Workforce Diversity in a Global Society: Technologies and Concepts , 2012 .

[7]  F. J. Domínguez-Mayo,et al.  Quality Issues on Model-Driven Web Engineering Methodologies , 2011 .

[8]  James R. Williams,et al.  Diversity Leadership in the Community College: Bridging the Gap , 2013 .

[9]  Mario Piattini,et al.  Managing software process measurement: A metamodel-based approach , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[10]  F. J. Domínguez-Mayo,et al.  TOWARDS A QUALITY EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR MODEL-DRIVEN WEB ENGINEERING METHODOLOGIES , 2010, WEBIST 2010.

[11]  Siti Zubaidah Othman.  The Planning Fallacy and Utilization of Human Resources Information Systems , 2009 .

[12]  S. Foster.  Making Sense of e-HRM: Transformation, Technology and Power Relations , 2009 .

[13]  Jesús Requena-Carrión,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Problem Based Learning Experience for Telecommunications Students , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Cap. Inf. Technol. Prof..

[14]  Mario Piattini,et al.  Classifying web metrics using the web quality model , 2005, Online Inf. Rev..

[15]  María José Escalona Cuaresma,et al.  NDT. A Model-Driven Approach for Web Requirements , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[16]  K. James,et al.  Leveraging Workforce Diversity using a Multidimensional Approach , 2012 .

[17]  Peter Fettke,et al.  Model Driven Architecture (MDA) , 2003, Wirtsch..

[18]  John E Paul.  Human resources in healthcare. , 2010, World health & population.

[19]  Nora Koch,et al.  Requirements Engineering for Web Applications - A Comparative Study , 2004, J. Web Eng..

[20]  Parastoo Mohagheghi,et al.  Developing a Quality Framework for Model-Driven Engineering , 2007, MoDELS Workshops.

[21]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[22]  Victor C. X. Wang.  Learning Organizations vs. Static Organizations in the Context of E-HRM , 2009 .

[23]  Joe'l Lewis,et al.  Technology as a Tool for Diversity Leadership: Implementation and Future Implications , 2012 .

[24]  Coral Calero,et al.  A Quality-Aware Engineering Process for Web Applications , 2008 .