ASPDock: protein-protein docking algorithm using atomic solvation parameters model

BackgroundAtomic Solvation Parameters (ASP) model has been proven to be a very successful method of calculating the binding free energy of protein complexes. This suggests that incorporating it into docking algorithms should improve the accuracy of prediction. In this paper we propose an FFT-based algorithm to calculate ASP scores of protein complexes and develop an ASP-based protein-protein docking method (ASPDock).ResultsThe ASPDock is first tested on the 21 complexes whose binding free energies have been determined experimentally. The results show that the calculated ASP scores have stronger correlation (r ≈ 0.69) with the binding free energies than the pure shape complementarity scores (r ≈ 0.48). The ASPDock is further tested on a large dataset, the benchmark 3.0, which contain 124 complexes and also shows better performance than pure shape complementarity method in docking prediction. Comparisons with other state-of-the-art docking algorithms showed that ASP score indeed gives higher success rate than the pure shape complementarity score of FTDock but lower success rate than Zdock3.0. We also developed a softly restricting method to add the information of predicted binding sites into our docking algorithm. The ASP-based docking method performed well in CAPRI rounds 18 and 19.ConclusionsASP may be more accurate and physical than the pure shape complementarity in describing the feature of protein docking.

[1]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Thomas Simonson,et al.  Testing the Coulomb/Accessible Surface Area solvent model for protein stability, ligand binding, and protein design , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Accessible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Miriam Eisenstein,et al.  Electrostatics in protein–protein docking , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[5]  E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  ZRANK: Reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function , 2007, Proteins.

[7]  Z. Weng,et al.  Protein–protein docking benchmark version 3.0 , 2008, Proteins.

[8]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  Frank Eisenhaber,et al.  Improved strategy in analytic surface calculation for molecular systems: Handling of singularities and computational efficiency , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[10]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding , 1986, Nature.

[11]  Chris Sander,et al.  The double cubic lattice method: Efficient approaches to numerical integration of surface area and volume and to dot surface contouring of molecular assemblies , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[12]  C. Dominguez,et al.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  Miriam Eisenstein,et al.  Hydrophobic complementarity in protein–protein docking , 2004, Proteins.

[14]  BMC Bioinformatics , 2005 .

[15]  Xiaoqin Zou,et al.  An iterative knowledge‐based scoring function for protein–protein recognition , 2008, Proteins.

[16]  I A Vakser Long-distance potentials: an approach to the multiple-minima problem in ligand-receptor interaction. , 1996, Protein engineering.

[17]  Eaton E. Lattman,et al.  Optimal sampling of the rotation function , 1972 .

[18]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics , 2002, Proteins.

[20]  M J Sternberg,et al.  Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes , 1999, Proteins.

[21]  M L Connolly,et al.  The molecular surface package. , 1993, Journal of molecular graphics.

[22]  Giuseppe Nicosia,et al.  Generalized pattern search algorithm for Peptide structure prediction. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[23]  D. Goodsell,et al.  Automated prediction of ligand‐binding sites in proteins , 2007, Proteins.

[24]  A. Lesk,et al.  Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Pan Quan PREDICTING PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTION BASED ON THE SEQUENCE-SEGMENTED AMINO ACID COMPOSITION , 2009 .

[26]  Ulrich H. E. Hansmann,et al.  A modern package for simulation of proteins , 2001 .

[27]  D. Ritchie,et al.  Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations , 2000, Proteins.

[28]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Julie C Mitchell,et al.  Finding needles in haystacks: Reranking DOT results by using shape complementarity, cluster analysis, and biological information , 2003, Proteins.

[30]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Ludwig Krippahl,et al.  Modeling protein complexes with BiGGER , 2003, Proteins.

[32]  Miriam Eisenstein,et al.  Weighted geometric docking: Incorporating external information in the rotation‐translation scan , 2003, Proteins.

[33]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Strengths and weaknesses of data‐driven docking in critical assessment of prediction of interactions , 2010, Proteins.

[34]  Werner Braun,et al.  Exact and efficient analytical calculation of the accessible surface areas and their gradients for macromolecules , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[35]  L. T. Ten Eyck,et al.  Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[36]  Ulrich H. E. Hansmann,et al.  SMMP) A modern package for simulation of proteins , 2001 .

[37]  Song Liu,et al.  Protein binding site prediction using an empirical scoring function , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  Luhua Lai,et al.  PSI‐DOCK: Towards highly efficient and accurate flexible ligand docking , 2006, Proteins.

[39]  I. Vakser,et al.  Evaluation of GRAMM low‐resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutinin‐antibody complex , 1997, Proteins.

[40]  M. Masuya,et al.  Detection and geometric modeling of molecular surfaces and cavities using digital mathematical morphological operations. , 1995, Journal of molecular graphics.

[41]  Z. Weng,et al.  Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction , 2007, Proteins.

[42]  C. Li,et al.  Biologically enhanced sampling geometric docking and backbone flexibility treatment with multiconformational superposition , 2005, Proteins.

[43]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Protein–protein docking benchmark version 4.0 , 2010, Proteins.

[44]  L. Krippahl,et al.  BiGGER: A new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions , 2000, Proteins.

[45]  S. Kim,et al.  "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  Hongyi Zhou,et al.  Stability scale and atomic solvation parameters extracted from 1023 mutation experiments , 2002, Proteins.

[47]  Shura Hayryan,et al.  A new analytical method for computing solvent‐accessible surface area of macromolecules and its gradients , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[48]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Soft protein–protein docking in internal coordinates , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[49]  Z. Weng,et al.  ZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm , 2003, Proteins.

[50]  C. Aflalo,et al.  Hydrophobic docking: A proposed enhancement to molecular recognition techniques , 1994, Proteins.

[51]  Tammy M. K. Cheng,et al.  pyDock: Electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid‐body protein–protein docking , 2007, Proteins.

[52]  W. C. Still,et al.  Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics , 1990 .

[53]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions , 2003, Proteins.