The International Military Intervention Dataset: An Updated Resource for Conflict Scholars

As major wars have become uncommon over recent decades and the efficacy of economic sanctions is questioned, foreign military intervention seems to have become increasingly prevalent on the international scene. Military intervention has also gained a degree of moral legitimacy, as it is now often launched for humanitarian ends rather than simply to further the intervener's strategic or material interests. Despite the apparent increase in the use of foreign military intervention as a policy tool in recent years, the quantitative international conflict literature continues to operate without either a comprehensive or a current inventory of foreign military interventions. The authors attempt to fill this gap by updating Pearson & Baumann's International Military Intervention (IMI) dataset from 1989 to 2005. IMI has a number of attributes that should make it attractive to quantitative international conflict scholars. One is that it is one of a small handful of interstate conflict datasets that attempts to discern the motives behind state uses of force. Also, its substantive coverage is broad, allowing researchers to separate out and focus on the forms of intervention (supportive, hostile, humanitarian, territorial, etc.) that are relevant to their research. As a preliminary validity test of the updated data, the authors analyze patterns of Cold War and post-Cold War military intervention in the IMI collection to see if they correspond with conventional wisdom on real world events.

[1]  Peter Wallensteen,et al.  Armed Conflict and Regional Conflict Complexes, 1989-97 , 1998 .

[2]  P. Sullivan War Aims and War Outcomes , 2007 .

[3]  Dan Reiter,et al.  Does Peace Nurture Democracy? , 2001, The Journal of Politics.

[4]  Faten Ghosn,et al.  The MID3 Data Set, 1993—2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description , 2004 .

[5]  P. Regan Civil Wars and Foreign Powers: Outside Intervention in Intrastate Conflict , 2000 .

[6]  Thomas G. Weiss,et al.  Sanctions as a Foreign Policy Tool: Weighing Humanitarian Impulses , 1999 .

[7]  Margaret G. Hermann,et al.  Ballots, a Barrier against the Use of Bullets and Bombs , 1996 .

[8]  Benjamin O. Fordham,et al.  Militarized Interstate Disputes and United States Uses of Force , 2001 .

[9]  A. Wildavsky,et al.  The Real World Order: Zones of Peace/Zones of Turmoil , 1994 .

[10]  Paul R. Hensel,et al.  Bones of Contention , 2008 .

[11]  Richard W. Mansbach,et al.  In Search of Theory: A New Paradigm for Global Politics , 1981 .

[12]  Emizet F. Kisangani,et al.  Diverting with Benevolent Military Force: Reducing Risks and Rising above Strategic Behavior , 2007 .

[13]  F. Pearson,et al.  Toward a regional model of international military intervention: The Middle Eastern experience , 1983 .

[14]  A. Talentino Intervention as Nation-building: Illusion or Possibility? , 2002 .

[15]  Chava Nachmias,et al.  Research Methods in the Social Sciences , 1976 .

[16]  M. Hermann,et al.  Democracies and Intervention: Is there a Danger Zone in the Democratic Peace? , 2001 .

[17]  D. Lemke African Lessons for International Relations Research , 2003 .

[18]  Paul F. Diehl,et al.  What Are They Fighting For? The Importance of Issues in International Conflict Research , 1992 .