The role of customers and vendors in modern construction equipment technology diffusion

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to address the gap in knowledge by exploring the role of customers and vendors in diffusion of modern equipment technologies into the construction industry. Design/methodology/approach To address the need to consider both vendors and customers in the innovation diffusion process and the need for in-depth cross-sectional studies, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 147 participants including 85 vendors and 62 customers of modern construction technologies at company, project and operational levels in Australia and North America. Thematic analysis and an analytic hierarchy process illustrate the critical role of both customers and vendors in the diffusion process of modern equipment technologies. Findings A new conceptual model is presented which classifies modern equipment technology customers into four categories: visionaries (group I); innovators (group II); pragmatists (group III); and conservatives (group IV) based on the way in which they interact with vendors in the innovation diffusion process. The results also reveal that there is a significant emotional/affective aspect of innovation diffusion decisions which has not been recognised in previous research. Originality/value The major contribution of this study is that it analyses the role of both vendors and customers in the equipment technology diffusion process at three different levels (strategic, project and operational) in large corporations and small-to-medium-sized businesses. The findings not only advance construction innovation research beyond traditional linear models of innovation, but also provide new knowledge which enable customers and vendors to interact more effectively in the diffusion of new construction equipment technologies.

[1]  Shu-Ling Lu,et al.  Clients Driving Innovation: Brandon/Clients Driving Innovation , 2008 .

[2]  Jung-Ho Yu,et al.  BIM Acceptance Model in Construction Organizations , 2015 .

[3]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[4]  Clyde B. Tatum.  Classification System for Construction Technology , 1988 .

[5]  Roger Tagg,et al.  Competitive advantage from erp projects: examining the role of key implementation drivers , 2014, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[6]  Martin Loosemore,et al.  Construction Innovation: Fifth Generation Perspective , 2015 .

[7]  Heng Li,et al.  Identifying and contextualising the motivations for BIM implementation in construction projects: An empirical study in China , 2017 .

[8]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Models of Construction Innovation , 1998 .

[9]  George Ofori,et al.  Construction industry development: role of technology transfer , 1994 .

[10]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[11]  Steven Davis,et al.  Conceptualising information and equipment technology adoption in construction , 2016 .

[12]  Hyojoo Son,et al.  Toward an understanding of construction professionals' acceptance of mobile computing devices in South Korea: An extension of the technology acceptance model , 2012 .

[13]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[14]  Albert Boonstra,et al.  How do top managers support strategic information system projects and why do they sometimes withhold this support , 2013 .

[15]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Technology development in construction: a continuum from distant past into the future , 2013 .

[16]  Aviad Shapira,et al.  AHP-Based Equipment Selection Model for Construction Projects , 2005 .

[17]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Project management information systems: An empirical study of their impact on project managers and project success , 2008 .

[18]  Mohan Thite,et al.  Leadership styles in information technology projects , 2000 .

[19]  Jennifer Attride-Stirling.  Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research , 2001 .

[20]  K. Roulston.  Data analysis and ‘theorizing as ideology’ , 2001 .

[21]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[22]  Deepak Khazanchi,et al.  Achieving IT project success through control, measurement, managing expectations, and top management support , 2008 .

[23]  Thayaparan Gajendran,et al.  Attitudes, behaviours and the transmission of cultural traits: Impacts on ICT/BIM use in a project team , 2012 .

[24]  Peter Brandon,et al.  Clients driving innovation , 2008 .

[25]  William J. Baumol.  The Microtheory of Innovative Entrepreneurship , 2010 .

[26]  D. Walker,et al.  Exploratory factors influencing information and communication technology diffusion and adoption within Australian construction organizations: a micro analysis , 2005 .

[27]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Enabling and measuring innovation in the construction industry , 2011 .

[28]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Innovation diffusion at the implementation stage of a construction project: a case study of information communication technology , 2006 .

[29]  Sal Restivo,et al.  Science, Technology, and Society: A Sociological Approach , 2005 .

[30]  R. Norman,et al.  A qualitative analysis of influences on recovery following a first episode of psychosis , 2013, The International journal of social psychiatry.

[31]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion , 1986 .

[32]  Miroslaw J. Skibniewski.  Research Trends in Information Technology Applications in Construction Safety Engineering and Management , 2014 .

[33]  M. Hardie.  Vectors of technical innovation delivery by small and medium Australian construction firms , 2016 .

[34]  Andrew Miller,et al.  A perception‐influence model for the management of technology implementation in construction , 2009 .

[35]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[36]  I. Dey.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists , 1993 .

[37]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[38]  Panagiotis Mitropoulos,et al.  Management-Driven Integration , 2000 .

[39]  Panagiotis Mitropoulos,et al.  TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS IN CONSTRUCTION ORGANIZATIONS , 1999 .

[40]  Crispin R. Coombs,et al.  When planned IS/IT project benefits are not realized: a study of inhibitors and facilitators to benefits realization , 2015 .

[41]  Kristian Widén,et al.  Setting the game plan – The role of clients in construction innovation and diffusion , 2008 .

[42]  P. Geroski.  Models of technology diffusion , 2000 .

[43]  Angeliki Poulymenakou,et al.  Investigating antecedents and drivers affecting the adoption of collaboration technologies in the construction industry , 2007 .

[44]  Gary Klein,et al.  The contribution of resource interdependence to IT program performance: A social interdependence perspective , 2011 .