Effects of acoustic feedback training in elite-standard Para-Rowing

Abstract Assessment and feedback devices have been regularly used in technique training in high-performance sports. Biomechanical analysis is mainly visually based and so can exclude athletes with visual impairments. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of auditory feedback on mean boat speed during on-water training of visually impaired athletes. The German National Para-Rowing team (six athletes, mean ± s, age 34.8 ± 10.6 years, body mass 76.5 ± 13.5 kg, stature 179.3 ± 8.6 cm) participated in the study. Kinematics included boat acceleration and distance travelled, collected with Sofirow at two intensities of training. The boat acceleration-time traces were converted online into acoustic feedback and presented via speakers during rowing (sections with and without alternately). Repeated-measures within-participant factorial ANOVA showed greater boat speed with acoustic feedback than baseline (0.08 ± 0.01 m·s−1). The time structure of rowing cycles was improved (extended time of positive acceleration). Questioning of athletes showed acoustic feedback to be a supportive training aid as it provided important functional information about the boat motion independent of vision. It gave access for visually impaired athletes to biomechanical analysis via auditory information. The concept for adaptive athletes has been successfully integrated into the preparation for the Para-Rowing World Championships and Paralympics.

[1]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  Auditory scene analysis : hearing in complex environments , 1993 .

[2]  Martin Keller,et al.  Improving motor performance: Selected aspects of augmented feedback in exercise and health , 2014, European journal of sport science.

[3]  Nina Schaffert,et al.  Designing an Acoustic Feedback System for On-Water Rowing Training , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Sport.

[4]  S. Marshall,et al.  Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  Arnold Baca,et al.  Rapid Feedback Systems for Elite Sports Training , 2006, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[6]  Alan M Batterham,et al.  Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. , 2006, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[7]  S. McAdams,et al.  Auditory Cognition. (Book Reviews: Thinking in Sound. The Cognitive Psychology of Human Audition.) , 1993 .

[8]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis, 4th ed. , 2005 .

[10]  Michael H Thaut,et al.  Rapid motor adaptations to subliminal frequency shifts during syncopated rhythmic sensorimotor synchronization. , 2003, Human movement science.

[11]  V Kleshnev,et al.  Boat acceleration, temporal structure of the stroke cycle, and effectiveness in rowing , 2010 .

[12]  M. Thaut,et al.  Kinematic optimization of spatiotemporal patterns in paretic arm training with stroke patients , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Roman Kamnik,et al.  DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ELITE AND NOVICE ROWERS ON ERGOMETER , 2012 .

[14]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[15]  Constanze Loschner,et al.  Biomechanics feedback for rowing , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[16]  John G. Neuhoff,et al.  Parameter Mapping Sonification , 2011 .

[17]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[18]  Will G. Hopkins,et al.  A spreadsheet for deriving a confidence interval, mechanistic inference and clinical inference from a P value , 2007 .

[19]  Nina Schaffert,et al.  An investigation of online acoustic information for elite rowers in on-water training conditions , 2011 .

[20]  Alfred Effenberg,et al.  Movement sonification: Effects on perception and action , 2005, IEEE MultiMedia.

[21]  Michael H. Thaut,et al.  Rhythm-driven optimization of motor control , 2003 .

[22]  A. Oxenham Pitch Perception , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Will G Hopkins,et al.  Variability and predictability of finals times of elite rowers. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[24]  M. Thaut,et al.  The connection between rhythmicity and brain function , 1999, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[25]  R. Riener,et al.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[26]  Alfred O. Effenberg MULTIMODAL CONVERGENT INFORMATION ENHANCES PERCEPTION ACCURACY OF HUMAN MOVEMENT PATTERNS , 2001 .

[27]  William W. Gaver How Do We Hear in the World?: Explorations in Ecological Acoustics , 1993 .

[28]  S. Hanrahan,et al.  Routledge Handbook of Applied Sport Psychology: A Comprehensive Guide for Students and Practitioners , 2010 .

[29]  Mahmood R. Azimi-Sadjadi,et al.  Rhythmic finger tapping to cosine-wave modulated metronome sequences: Evidence of subliminal entrainment , 1998 .

[30]  Michael H. Thaut,et al.  Rhythm, Music, and the Brain: Scientific Foundations and Clinical Applications , 2005 .

[31]  David Hawkins,et al.  Investigation of biomechanical factors affecting rowing performance. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.