Community Capacity as an “Inside Job”: Evolution of Perceived Ownership within a University-Aboriginal Community Partnership

Purpose. To assess the evolution of perceived ownership of a university-Aboriginal community partnership across three project stages. Design. Survey administration to project partners during project formalization (1996—T1), mobilization (1999—T2), and maintenance (2004—T3). Setting. Aboriginal community of Kahnawake, outside Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Participants. Partners involved in influencing decision making in the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project (KSDPP). Measure and Analysis. A measure of perceived primary ownership subjected to linear trend analysis. Results. KSDPP staff were perceived as primary owner at T1 and shared ownership with Community Advisory Board (CAB) members at T2 and T3. Trend tests indicated greater perceived ownership between T1 and T3 for CAB (χ21 = 12.3, p < .0001) and declining KSDPP staff (χ21 = 10.5, p < .001) ownership over time. Academic partners were never perceived as primary owners. Conclusion. This project was community driven from the beginning. It was not dependent on an external academic change agent to activate the community and develop the community's capacity to plan and implement a solution. It still took several years for the grassroots CAB to take responsibility from KSDPP staff, thus indicating the need for sustained funding to build grassroots community capacity.

[1]  Shawna L. Mercer,et al.  The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. , 2008, Annual review of public health.

[2]  A. Macaulay,et al.  Can the democratic ideal of participatory research be achieved? An inside look at an academic-indigenous community partnership. , 2007, Health education research.

[3]  Michelle Chino,et al.  Building true capacity: indigenous models for indigenous communities. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[4]  S. R. Lavinghouze.  Practical Program Evaluation: Assessing and Improving Planning, Implementation, and Effectiveness , 2005, Preventing Chronic Disease.

[5]  A. Macaulay,et al.  Community governance of the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project, Kahnawake Territory, Mohawk Nation, Canada. , 2003, Health promotion international.

[6]  N. Wallerstein.  Power between evaluator and community: research relationships within New Mexico's healthier communities. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[7]  R. Goodman,et al.  Identifying and Defining the Dimensions of Community Capacity to Provide a Basis for Measurement , 1998, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[8]  R Kirby,et al.  The Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project: intervention, evaluation, and baseline results of a diabetes primary prevention program with a native community in Canada. , 1997, Preventive medicine.

[9]  B. Flynn.  Measuring community leaders' perceived ownership of health education programs: initial tests of reliability and validity. , 1995, Health education research.

[10]  Huey-Tsyh Chen,et al.  Practical program evaluation : assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness , 2005 .

[11]  Huey-Tsyh Chen,et al.  Practical program evaluation : assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness , 2005 .

[12]  David M. Fetterman,et al.  Empowerment evaluation principles in practice , 2005 .