MEGSA: A powerful and flexible framework for analyzing mutual exclusivity of tumor mutations

The central challenges in tumor sequencing studies is to identify driver genes and pathways, investigate their functional relationships, and nominate drug targets. The efficiency of these analyses, particularly for infrequently mutated genes, is compromised when subjects carry different combinations of driver mutations. Mutual exclusivity analysis helps address these challenges. To identify mutually exclusive gene sets (MEGS), we developed a powerful and flexible analytic framework based on a likelihood ratio test and a model selection procedure. Extensive simulations demonstrated that our method outperformed existing methods for both statistical power and the capability of identifying the exact MEGS, particularly for highly imbalanced MEGS. Our method can be used for de novo discovery, for pathway-guided searches, or for expanding established small MEGS. We applied our method to the whole-exome sequencing data for 13 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We identified multiple previously unreported non-pairwise MEGS in multiple cancer types. For acute myeloid leukemia, we identified a MEGS with five genes (FLT3, IDH2, NRAS, KIT, and TP53) and a MEGS (NPM1, TP53, and RUNX1) whose mutation status was strongly associated with survival (p = 6.7 × 10(-4)). For breast cancer, we identified a significant MEGS consisting of TP53 and four infrequently mutated genes (ARID1A, AKT1, MED23, and TBL1XR1), providing support for their role as cancer drivers.

[1]  J. Auwerx,et al.  Emerging roles of the corepressors NCoR1 and SMRT in homeostasis. , 2013, Genes & development.

[2]  H. Ji,et al.  Selective requirement for Mediator MED23 in Ras-active lung cancer , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Shirley M. Taylor,et al.  p53-mediated repression of DNA methyltransferase 1 expression by specific DNA binding. , 2003, Cancer research.

[4]  A. Sivachenko,et al.  A Landscape of Driver Mutations in Melanoma , 2012, Cell.

[5]  A. Shevchenko,et al.  Transcription Control by E1A and MAP Kinase Pathway via Sur2 Mediator Subunit , 2002, Science.

[6]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  CoMEt: a statistical approach to identify combinations of mutually exclusive alterations in cancer , 2015, Genome Biology.

[7]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  The Life History of 21 Breast Cancers , 2012, Cell.

[9]  H. Varmus,et al.  KRAS Mutations and Primary Resistance of Lung Adenocarcinomas to Gefitinib or Erlotinib , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[10]  M. Haigis,et al.  Mitochondria and Cancer , 2016, Cell.

[11]  Christopher A. Miller,et al.  Discovering functional modules by identifying recurrent and mutually exclusive mutational patterns in tumors , 2011, BMC Medical Genomics.

[12]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumor types , 2014, Nature.

[13]  Shi-Hua Zhang,et al.  Efficient methods for identifying mutated driver pathways in cancer , 2012, Bioinform..

[14]  Brian H. Dunford-Shore,et al.  Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma , 2008, Nature.

[15]  Niko Beerenwinkel,et al.  Modeling Mutual Exclusivity of Cancer Mutations , 2014, RECOMB.

[16]  Pan‐Chyr Yang,et al.  Dysregulation of p53/Sp1 control leads to DNA methyltransferase-1 overexpression in lung cancer. , 2010, Cancer research.

[17]  S. Fröhling,et al.  Deregulation of signaling pathways in acute myeloid leukemia. , 2008, Seminars in oncology.

[18]  P. Jiang,et al.  p53 and regulation of tumor metabolism , 2013, Journal of carcinogenesis.

[19]  A. Nakagawara,et al.  RUNX Family Participates in the Regulation of p53-Dependent DNA Damage Response , 2013, International journal of genomics.

[20]  A. McKenna,et al.  Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2013 .

[22]  Anbu K. Adikesavan,et al.  Activation of p53 Transcriptional Activity by SMRT: a Histone Deacetylase 3-Independent Function of a Transcriptional Corepressor , 2014, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[23]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors , 2012, Nature.

[24]  F. Recillas-Targa,et al.  Epigenetic regulation of the human p53 gene promoter by the CTCF transcription factor in transformed cell lines , 2010, Oncogene.

[25]  Eli Upfal,et al.  De Novo Discovery of Mutated Driver Pathways in Cancer , 2011, RECOMB.

[26]  Wei Yan,et al.  GATA3 Inhibits Breast Cancer Metastasis through the Reversal of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  T. Mak,et al.  Regulation of cancer cell metabolism , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[28]  Tian-Li Wang,et al.  ARID1A, a factor that promotes formation of SWI/SNF-mediated chromatin remodeling, is a tumor suppressor in gynecologic cancers. , 2011, Cancer research.

[29]  M. Stucki,et al.  Loss of ARID1A expression sensitizes cancer cells to PI3K- and AKT-inhibition , 2014, Oncotarget.

[30]  B. Tops,et al.  Glutamate as chemotactic fuel for diffuse glioma cells: are they glutamate suckers? , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[31]  Q. Vuong Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses , 1989 .

[32]  K. Smolková,et al.  The Role of Mitochondrial NADPH-Dependent Isocitrate Dehydrogenase in Cancer Cells , 2012, International journal of cell biology.

[33]  D. Reinberg,et al.  CTCF regulates the human p53 gene through direct interaction with its natural antisense transcript, Wrap53 , 2014, Genes & development.

[34]  P. Storz,et al.  Reactive oxygen species in cancer , 2010, Free radical research.

[35]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[36]  C. Sander,et al.  Systematic identification of cancer driving signaling pathways based on mutual exclusivity of genomic alterations , 2014, Genome Biology.

[37]  Nam-Ho Kim,et al.  Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases and Reactive Oxygen Species: How Can ROS Activate MAPK Pathways? , 2011, Journal of signal transduction.

[38]  A. McKenna,et al.  Evolution and Impact of Subclonal Mutations in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia , 2012, Cell.

[39]  B. Frenkel,et al.  The RUNX family in breast cancer: relationships with estrogen signaling , 2013, Oncogene.

[40]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  THetA: inferring intra-tumor heterogeneity from high-throughput DNA sequencing data , 2013, Genome Biology.

[41]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma , 2014, Nature.

[42]  C. Sander,et al.  Mutual exclusivity analysis identifies oncogenic network modules. , 2012, Genome research.

[43]  Roded Sharan,et al.  Simultaneous Identification of Multiple Driver Pathways in Cancer , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  F. Ducray,et al.  IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  Steven A. Roberts,et al.  Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes , 2013 .

[46]  H. Handa,et al.  Mediator requirement for both recruitment and postrecruitment steps in transcription initiation. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[47]  Weidong Wang,et al.  Characterization of SWI/SNF protein expression in human breast cancer cell lines and other malignancies , 2001, Journal of cellular physiology.

[48]  Dylan J. Taatjes,et al.  The Mediator complex and transcription regulation , 2013, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.