The Boundaries of Loss Aversion

In this article, the authors propose some psychological principles to describe the boundaries of loss aversion. A key idea is that exchange goods that are given up “as intended” do not exhibit loss aversion. For example, the authors propose that money given up in purchases is not generally subject to loss aversion. The results of several experiments provide preliminary support for the hypotheses. The authors find that, consistent with prospect theory, loss aversion provides a complete account of risk aversion for risks with equal probability to win or lose. The authors propose boundaries for this result and suggest further tests of the model.

[1]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Mere-Possession Effects without Possession in Consumer Choice , 1997 .

[2]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method , 1987 .

[3]  G. Chapman.  Similarity and reluctance to trade , 1998 .

[4]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  The influence of goals on value and choice , 2000 .

[5]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Testing competing models of loss aversion: an adversarial collaboration , 2005 .

[6]  Bruce G. S. Hardie,et al.  Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice , 1993 .

[7]  Robyn A. Leboeuf.  Discount Rates for Time versus Dates: The Sensitivity of Discounting to Time-Interval Description , 2006 .

[8]  Erica Mina Okada,et al.  Trade-ins, Mental Accounting, and Product Replacement Decisions , 2001 .

[9]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  F. W. Wicker,et al.  Studies of Loss Aversion and Perceived Necessity , 1995 .

[11]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  How Do Intentions Affect Loss Aversion? , 2005 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[14]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value , 1984 .

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[16]  R. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of the Focus of Comparison on Consumer Preferences , 1992 .

[17]  I. Bateman,et al.  A Test of the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences , 1997 .

[18]  D. Ariely,et al.  When Do Losses Loom Larger than Gains? , 2005 .

[19]  R. Thaler,et al.  Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle , 1993 .

[20]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  A Tale of Two Pizzas: Building Up from a Basic Product Versus Scaling Down from a Fully-Loaded Product , 2002 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[22]  M. Rabin.  Risk Aversion and Expected Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem , 2000 .

[23]  Jack B. Soll,et al.  Mental Budgeting and Consumer Decisions , 1996 .

[24]  D. Putler.  Incorporating Reference Price Effects into a Theory of Consumer Choice , 1992 .

[25]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Modeling the Psychology of Consumer and Firm Behavior with Behavioral Economics , 2006, Journal of Marketing Research.

[26]  J. Knetsch.  The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves. , 1989 .

[27]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[28]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  Heart Strings and Purse Strings , 2004, Psychological science.

[29]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Egocentric Empathy Gaps between Owners and Buyers: Misperceptions of the Endowment Effect , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of Objects , 1998 .

[31]  Russell S. Winer,et al.  A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. , 1986 .

[32]  Colin Camerer.  Three Cheers—Psychological, Theoretical, Empirical—for Loss Aversion , 2005 .

[33]  M. Rabin,et al.  A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences , 2006 .

[34]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  Option Attachment: When Deliberating Makes Choosing Feel Like Losing. , 2003 .

[35]  D. Ariely,et al.  Focusing on the Forgone: How Value Can Appear So Different to Buyers and Sellers , 2000 .

[36]  E. Dijk,et al.  Trading wine: On the endowment effect, loss aversion, and the comparability of consumer goods , 1998 .

[37]  R. Thaler.  Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[38]  E. Dijk,et al.  Buying and selling exchange goods: Loss aversion and the endowment effect , 1996 .

[39]  Vera Hoorens,et al.  Time is an amazingly variable amount of money: Endowment and ownership effects in the subjective value of working time , 1999 .