OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of (68)Ge-based and CT-based attenuation correction as well as two standard image reconstruction algorithms on the appearance of artefacts due to dental hardware. Additionally, the intensity of such artefacts was compared with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in patients with known oral cavity squamous cell cancer.
METHODS
Thirty-two metallic and non-metallic objects used for dentistry/dental surgery were scanned in a water-bath filled with FDG on a combined PET/CT scanner. Images were reconstructed with either CT-based or (68)Ge-based transmission data and by using iterative reconstruction or filtered backprojection. The intensity of artefacts was assessed visually using a subjective scale from 0 (no artefact visible) to 4 (very strong artefact), and by quantitative measurements. In a second study, images of 30 patients with known squamous cell cancer and dental hardware were retrospectively analysed by two observers, again using a visual assessment grading system. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for statistical comparisons.
RESULTS
Eighteen of 32 objects caused artefacts, which were visible with both attenuation correction methods. CT-based attenuation correction was visually more intense than (68)Ge-based attenuation correction (P<0.0001), and the measured (18)F concentration was also higher (P=0.0002). No difference was found between the reconstruction algorithms. In 28 of 30 patients the primary tumour was visible. FDG uptake in the primary tumour was significantly higher than measured (18)F concentration in artefacts (P<0.0001).
CONCLUSION
Attenuation correction of PET images generates artefacts adjacent to dental hardware that mimic FDG uptake. In this series, the primary lesion was discriminated from artefacts.
[1]
A. Buck,et al.
Head and neck imaging with PET and PET/CT: artefacts from dental metallic implants
,
2002,
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[2]
Cyrill Burger,et al.
Impact of metallic dental implants on CT-based attenuation correction in a combined PET/CT scanner
,
2003,
European Radiology.
[3]
Paul Kinahan,et al.
Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner.
,
1998,
Medical physics.
[4]
G Rosen,et al.
Attenuation-Correction Induced Artifact in F-18 FDG PET Imaging Following Total Knee Replacement.
,
2000,
Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.
[5]
A. Buck,et al.
PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients
,
2002,
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[6]
V. Bettinardi,et al.
An automatic classification technique for attenuation correction in positron emission tomography
,
1999,
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[7]
Cyrill Burger,et al.
Artifacts at PET and PET/CT caused by metallic hip prosthetic material.
,
2003,
Radiology.