Morphological procedure for mammogram enhancement and registration

Screening mammography often incorporates a computer aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme in its procedure to increase the detection rates of gradual changes in breast tissues. One method for detecting gradual changes in temporal mammograms is through the use of registration algorithms. Images of degraded resolution present an obstacle to accurate registration, however. The performance of registration algorithms and, hence, the performance of the CADs are directly proportional to the quality of the input mammograms. In this paper, we present a novel approach for increasing the quality of the mammograms based on morphological operations and contrast enhancement prior to performing the registration step. The registration algorithm is applied using a structural similarity (SSIM) index. Based on the radiologist’s evaluation, this work provided accurate results that were more helpful in detecting changes over time in the registered mammogram pair.

[1]  Fátima de Lourdes dos Santos Nunes,et al.  Contrast Enhancement in Dense Breast Images to Aid Clustered Microcalcifications Detection , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[2]  KathleenR. Brandt,et al.  Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection--prospective evaluation. , 2006, Radiology.

[3]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program. , 1998, Radiology.

[4]  J. Hoffmeister,et al.  Computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms , 2010, Acta radiologica.

[5]  H. Krontiras,et al.  How Do I Screen Patients for Breast Cancer? , 2013, Current Treatment Options in Oncology.

[6]  Taxiarchis Botsis,et al.  Automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using mathematical morphology and neural networks , 2007, Signal Process..

[7]  Peter C Gøtzsche,et al.  Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography , 2001, The Lancet.

[8]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  S. Saha,et al.  Nodal positivity in breast cancer correlated with the number of lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging versus mammogram. , 2011, American journal of surgery.

[10]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Local Determination of a Moving Contrast Edge , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Diane Rinella Mammography Positioning: The CC and MLO , 2005 .

[12]  Hai Dinh,et al.  Improved method of pectoral muscle detection based on two straight line fitting algorithm , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Industrial Automation, Information and Communications Technology.

[13]  H. Krontiras,et al.  Image‐guided methods for biopsy of suspicious breast lesions , 2011, Journal of surgical oncology.