Interim Positron Emission Tomography Response-Adapted Therapy in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase II Part of the HD0801 Study.

PURPOSE The clinical impact of positron emission tomography (PET) evaluation performed early during first-line therapy in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma, in terms of providing a rationale to shift patients who respond poorly onto a more intensive regimen (PET response-adapted therapy), remains to be confirmed. PATIENTS AND METHODS The phase II part of the multicenter HD0801 study involved 519 patients with advanced-stage de novo Hodgkin lymphoma who received an initial treatment with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) and who underwent an early ifosfamide-containing salvage treatment followed by stem-cell transplantation if they showed a positive PET evaluation after two cycles of chemotherapy (PET2). The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival calculated for both PET2-negative patients (who completed a full six cycles of ABVD treatment) and PET2-positive patients. Overall survival was a secondary end point. RESULTS In all, 103 of the 512 evaluable patients were PET2 positive. Among them, 81 received the scheduled salvage regimen with transplantation, 15 remained on ABVD (physician's decision, mostly because of minimally positive PET2), five received an alternative treatment, and two were excluded because of diagnostic error. On intention-to-treat analysis, the 2-year progression-free survival was 76% for PET2-positive patients (regardless of the salvage treatment they received) and 81% for PET2-negative patients. CONCLUSION Patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma for whom treatment was at high risk of failing appear to benefit from early treatment intensification with autologous transplantation, as indicated by the possibility of successful salvage treatment in more than 70% of PET2-positive patients through obtaining the same 2-year progression-free survival as the PET2-negative subgroup.

[1]  O. Casasnovas,et al.  ABVD (8 cycles) versus BEACOPP (4 escalated cycles ≥ 4 baseline): final results in stage III-IV low-risk Hodgkin lymphoma (IPS 0-2) of the LYSA H34 randomized trial. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  V. Diehl,et al.  Effect of initial treatment strategy on survival of patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  J. Rowe,et al.  A 10‐year experience with treatment of high and standard risk Hodgkin disease: Six cycles of tailored BEACOPP, with interim scintigraphy, are effective and female fertility is preserved , 2012, American journal of hematology.

[4]  A. Rossi,et al.  ABVD versus BEACOPP for Hodgkin's lymphoma when high-dose salvage is planned. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  A. Rossi,et al.  Early chemotherapy intensification with BEACOPP in advanced‐stage Hodgkin lymphoma patients with a interim‐PET positive after two ABVD courses , 2011, British journal of haematology.

[6]  V. Diehl,et al.  Escalated-dose BEACOPP in the treatment of patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: 10 years of follow-up of the GHSG HD9 study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  T. Nihashi,et al.  Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for interim response assessment of advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  F. Angrilli,et al.  ABVD compared with BEACOPP compared with CEC for the initial treatment of patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma: results from the HD2000 Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dei Linfomi Trial. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Michel Meignan,et al.  Report on the First International Workshop on interim-PET scan in lymphoma , 2009, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[10]  A. Santoro,et al.  IGEV regimen and a fixed dose of lenograstim: an effective mobilization regimen in pretreated Hodgkin's lymphoma patients , 2007, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[11]  F. d'Amore,et al.  Early interim 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is prognostically superior to international prognostic score in advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: a report from a joint Italian-Danish study. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  Klemens Scheidhauer,et al.  Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  J. Rowe,et al.  Risk-adapted BEACOPP regimen can reduce the cumulative dose of chemotherapy for standard and high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma with no impairment of outcome. , 2007, Blood.

[15]  S. Pileri,et al.  Early positron emission tomography (PET) restaging: a predictive final response in Hodgkin's disease patients. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  P. Gobbi,et al.  The clinical value of tumor burden at diagnosis in Hodgkin lymphoma , 2004, Cancer.

[17]  P. Gobbi,et al.  Comparison of prognostic models in patients with advanced Hodgkin disease , 2001, Cancer.

[18]  J. Armitage,et al.  A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin's disease. International Prognostic Factors Project on Advanced Hodgkin's Disease. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Early interim 18F-FDG PET in Hodgkin’s lymphoma: evaluation on 304 patients , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  V. Diehl,et al.  ABVD versus BEACOPP for Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  A. Nagler,et al.  Two cycles of escalated BEACOPP followed by four cycles of ABVD utilizing early-interim PET/CT scan is an effective regimen for advanced high-risk Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[22]  A. Santoro,et al.  Ifosfamide, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine: a new induction regimen for refractory and relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2007, Haematologica.

[23]  A. Levis,et al.  The predictive value of positron emission tomography scanning performed after two courses of standard therapy on treatment outcome in advanced stage Hodgkin's disease. , 2006, Haematologica.

[24]  Martin Hutchings,et al.  FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2006, Blood.