Sensitivity analysis approaches to high-dimensional screening problems at low sample size

ABSTRACT Sensitivity analysis is an essential tool in the development of robust models for engineering, physical sciences, economics and policy-making, but typically requires running the model a large number of times in order to estimate sensitivity measures. While statistical emulators allow sensitivity analysis even on complex models, they only perform well with a moderately low number of model inputs: in higher dimensional problems they tend to require a restrictively high number of model runs unless the model is relatively linear. Therefore, an open question is how to tackle sensitivity problems in higher dimensionalities, at very low sample sizes. This article examines the relative performance of four sampling-based measures which can be used in such high-dimensional nonlinear problems. The measures tested are the Sobol' total sensitivity indices, the absolute mean of elementary effects, a derivative-based global sensitivity measure, and a modified derivative-based measure. Performance is assessed in a ‘screening’ context, by assessing the ability of each measure to identify influential and non-influential inputs on a wide variety of test functions at different dimensionalities. The results show that the best-performing measure in the screening context is dependent on the model or function, but derivative-based measures have a significant potential at low sample sizes that is currently not widely recognised.

[1]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Estimating the approximation error when fixing unessential factors in global sensitivity analysis , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Constantinos C. Pantelides,et al.  Monte Carlo evaluation of derivative-based global sensitivity measures , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Vilfredo Pareto,et al.  Manuale di economia politica , 1965 .

[4]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[6]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[7]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[8]  James E. Campbell,et al.  An Approach to Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Models: Part I—Introduction, Input Variable Selection and Preliminary Variable Assessment , 1981 .

[9]  Jeremy E. Oakley,et al.  Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a nonlinear finite element model , 2012 .

[10]  Peter C. Young,et al.  State Dependent Parameter metamodelling and sensitivity analysis , 2007, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[11]  Hozumi Morohosi,et al.  A Practical Approach to the Error , 1998 .

[12]  Gilles Pujol,et al.  Simplex-based screening designs for estimating metamodels , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach , 2004 .

[14]  A. Griewank,et al.  Derivative‐Based Global Sensitivity Analysis: Upper Bounding of Sensitivities in Seismic‐Hazard Assessment Using Automatic Differentiation , 2017 .

[15]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[16]  I. Sobol On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals , 1967 .

[17]  R. Caflisch Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods , 1998, Acta Numerica.

[18]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  From screening to quantitative sensitivity analysis. A unified approach , 2011, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[19]  William Becker,et al.  A comparison of two sampling methods for global sensitivity analysis , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[20]  Bruno Tuffin,et al.  On the use of low discrepancy sequences in Monte Carlo methods , 1996, Monte Carlo Methods Appl..

[21]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis Challenges in Biological Systems Modeling , 2009 .

[22]  Sergei S. Kucherenko,et al.  Derivative based global sensitivity measures and their link with global sensitivity indices , 2009, Math. Comput. Simul..

[23]  A. Owen Randomly Permuted (t,m,s)-Nets and (t, s)-Sequences , 1995 .

[24]  M. Jansen Analysis of variance designs for model output , 1999 .

[25]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Application of global sensitivity analysis to biological models , 2008 .

[26]  I. Sobola,et al.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[27]  Hozumi Morohosi,et al.  A Practical Approach to the Error Estimation of Quasi-Monte Carlo Integrations , 2000 .

[28]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[29]  Nilay Shah,et al.  The identification of model effective dimensions using global sensitivity analysis , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  W. Becker,et al.  Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a model of the aortic valve. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  I. Sobol,et al.  A new derivative based importance criterion for groups of variables and its link with the global sensitivity indices , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[32]  I. Sobol Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[33]  R. Cranley,et al.  Randomization of Number Theoretic Methods for Multiple Integration , 1976 .

[34]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[35]  Art B. Owen,et al.  Latin supercube sampling for very high-dimensional simulations , 1998, TOMC.