Enhanced and synthetic vision for terminal maneuvering area NextGen operations

Synthetic Vision Systems and Enhanced Flight Vision System (SVS/EFVS) technologies have the potential to provide additional margins of safety for aircrew performance and enable operational improvements for low visibility operations in the terminal area environment with equivalent efficiency as visual operations. To meet this potential, research is needed for effective technology development and implementation of regulatory and design guidance to support introduction and use of SVS/EFVS advanced cockpit vision technologies in Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) operations. A fixed-base pilot-in-the-loop simulation test was conducted at NASA Langley Research Center that evaluated the use of SVS/EFVS in NextGen low visibility ground (taxi) operations and approach/landing operations. Twelve crews flew approach and landing operations in a simulated NextGen Chicago O'Hare environment. Various scenarios tested the potential for EFVS for operations in visibility as low as 1000 ft runway visibility range (RVR) and SVS to enable lower decision heights (DH) than can currently be flown today. Expanding the EFVS visual segment from DH to the runway in visibilities as low as 1000 RVR appears to be viable as touchdown performance was excellent without any workload penalties noted for the EFVS concept tested. A lower DH to 150 ft and/or possibly reduced visibility minima by virtue of SVS equipage appears to be viable when implemented on a Head-Up Display, but the landing data suggests further study for head-down implementations.

[1]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Simulation evaluation of synthetic vision as an enabling technology for equivalent visual operations , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[2]  T. Schnell,et al.  Terrain awareness & pathway guidance for head-up displays (tapguide); a simulator study of pilot performance , 2003, Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2003. DASC '03. The 22nd.

[3]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Enhanced vision for all-weather operations under NextGen , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  K. Lemos,et al.  Synthetic vision systems: human performance assessment of the influence of terrain density and texture , 2003, Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2003. DASC '03. The 22nd.

[5]  Lawrence L Ames,et al.  Revision and Verification of a Seven-Point Workload Estimate Scale , 1993 .

[6]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  CFIT prevention using synthetic vision , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Synthetic Vision Systems: The Effects of Guidance Symbology, Display Size, and Field of View , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[8]  S. G. Corps.  Airbus A320 Side Stick and Fly By Wire — An Update , 1986 .

[9]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Flight testing an integrated synthetic vision system , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Jens Schiefele,et al.  Human factors flight trial analysis for 3D SVS: part II , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[11]  Michael A. Vidulich,et al.  Testing a Subjective Metric of Situation Awareness , 1991 .

[12]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Synthetic Vision Enhances Situation Awareness and RNP Capabilities for Terrain-Challenged Approaches , 2003 .

[13]  Yongjin Kwon,et al.  Improved Flight Technical Performance in Flight Decks Equipped With Synthetic Vision Information System Displays , 2004 .