The Source of the Symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects

Human number understanding is thought to rely on the analog number system (ANS), working according to Weber’s law. We propose an alternative account, suggesting that symbolic mathematical knowledge is based on a discrete semantic system (DSS), a representation that stores values in a semantic network, similar to the mental lexicon or to a conceptual network. Here, focusing on the phenomena of numerical distance and size effects in comparison tasks, first we discuss how a DSS model could explain these numerical effects. Second, we demonstrate that the DSS model can give quantitatively as appropriate a description of the effects as the ANS model. Finally, we show that symbolic numerical size effect is mainly influenced by the frequency of the symbols, and not by the ratios of their values. This last result suggests that numerical distance and size effects cannot be caused by the ANS, while the DSS model might be the alternative approach that can explain the frequency-based size effect.

[1]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  J. Hummel,et al.  Why spatial-numeric associations aren't evidence for a mental number line , 2008 .

[3]  U. Cress,et al.  How number-space relationships are assessed before formal schooling: A taxonomy proposal , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[4]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Single-trial classification of parallel pre-attentive and serial attentive processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[7]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[9]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  A model of exact small-number representation , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  M. Just,et al.  Decoding the representation of numerical values from brain activation patterns , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Tali Leibovich,et al.  The symbol-grounding problem in numerical cognition: A review of theory, evidence, and outstanding questions. , 2016, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[12]  A. Idrissi,et al.  On the Mental Representation of , 2008 .

[13]  J. Jonides,et al.  Working memory for order and the parietal cortex: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2006, Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Shadlen,et al.  The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[15]  E. R. Grossman The Measurement of Discriminability , 1955 .

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[17]  C Leth-Steensen,et al.  A model of response time effects in symbolic comparison. , 2000, Psychological review.

[18]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[19]  Tom Verguts,et al.  A delta-rule model of numerical and non-numerical order processing. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Dana Ganor-Stern,et al.  The Representation of Negative Numbers: Exploring the Effects of Mode of Processing and Notation , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[22]  S. Dehaene Symbols and quantities in parietal cortex: elements of a mathematical theory of number representation and manipulation , 2007 .

[23]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Children's representation of symbolic magnitude: the development of the priming distance effect. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[24]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[25]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Beyond the number domain , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  What everyone finds: The problem-size effect. , 2005 .

[27]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human knowledge: A case study of mathematics , 2004 .

[28]  W. Levelt,et al.  Semantic distance effects on object and action naming , 2002, Cognition.

[29]  J. Bulthé,et al.  Format-dependent representations of symbolic and non-symbolic numbers in the human cortex as revealed by multi-voxel pattern analyses , 2014, NeuroImage.

[30]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words , 1992, Cognition.

[31]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[32]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Qualitatively different coding of symbolic and nonsymbolic numbers in the human brain , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[34]  Wim Fias,et al.  Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  Arava Y. Kallai,et al.  A generalized fraction: an entity smaller than one on the mental number line. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Developmental Changes in the Profiles of Dyscalculia: An Explanation Based on a Double Exact-and-Approximate Number Representation Model , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[37]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  A Supramodal Number Representation in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[38]  A. Henik,et al.  Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line , 1999, Cognition.

[40]  G. R. Potts Information Processing Strategies Used in the Encoding of Linear Orderings. , 1972 .

[41]  Craig Leth-Steensen,et al.  MODELLING SNARC BY USING POLARITY CODES TO ADJUST DRIFT RATES , 2011 .

[42]  J. D. Balakrishnan,et al.  Is subitizing a unique numerical ability? , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  G. Cumming Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis , 2011 .

[44]  N. Prins Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction , 2009 .

[45]  P. Gordon Numerical Cognition Without Words: Evidence from Amazonia , 2004, Science.

[46]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[47]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  Yang Seok Cho,et al.  Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  A. Krajcsi Numerical distance and size effects dissociate in Indo-Arabic number comparison , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[51]  A. T. Welford,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SENSORY-MOTOR PERFORMANCE : SURVEY AND REAPPRAISAL OF TWELVE YEARS' PROGRESS , 1960 .

[52]  J. Tzelgov,et al.  Expanding on the mental number line: zero is perceived as the "smallest". , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[53]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Primed numbers : Exploring the modularity of numerical representations with masked and unmasked semantic priming , 1999 .

[54]  Bert De Smedt,et al.  Visual Number Beats Abstract Numerical Magnitude: Format-dependent Representation of Arabic Digits and Dot Patterns in Human Parietal Cortex , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[55]  Emmy Defever,et al.  The Approximate Number System is not Predictive for Symbolic Number Processing in Kindergarteners , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[56]  Michael Schneider,et al.  Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: a meta-analysis. , 2017, Developmental science.

[57]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[58]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.